Talk:Armenian genocide recognition

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armenian genocide recognition article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 45 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Armenian genocide recognition. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Armenian genocide recognition at the Reference desk.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Armenia Mid‑importance Armenian genocide recognition is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Turkey Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Former countries: Ottoman Empire This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Mid-importance). European history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disaster management Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Discrimination Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Human rights High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Avedian, Vahagn (2018). Knowledge and Acknowledgement in the Politics of Memory of the Armenian Genocide. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-84515-4. Ben Aharon, Eldad (2019). "Recognition of the Armenian Genocide after its Centenary: A Comparative Analysis of Changing Parliamentary Positions". Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs. 13 (3): 339–352. doi:10.1080/23739770.2019.1737911. Davidjants, Jaana; Tiidenberg, Katrin (2022). "Activist memory narration on social media: Armenian genocide on Instagram". New Media & Society. 24 (10): 2191–2206. doi:10.1177/1461444821989634. Fittante, Daniel (2023). "Constructivist memory politics: Armenian genocide recognition in Latvia". International Affairs. 99 (2): 805–824. doi:10.1093/ia/iiad022. Fittante, Daniel (2022). "Sweden's 'complicated' relationship with genocide recognition". Acta Sociologica. doi:10.1177/00016993221141587. Fittante, Daniel (2022). "'Out-Europeanising' the Competition: Armenian Genocide Recognition in Bulgaria". Europe-Asia Studies. 74 (10): 1895–1914. doi:10.1080/09668136.2022.2050678. Kebranian, Nanor (2020). "Genocide, History, and the Law: Legal Performativity and Recognition of the Armenian Genocide in France and Germany". Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 34 (2): 253–273. doi:10.1093/hgs/dcaa027. Koinova, Maria (2019). "Diaspora coalition-building for genocide recognition: Armenians, Assyrians and Kurds". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 42 (11): 1890–1910. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1572908. Zarifian, Julien (2013). "The United States and the (Non-)Recognition of the Armenian Genocide". Études arméniennes contemporaines (1): 75–95. doi:10.4000/eac.361. ISSN 2269-5281.</ref>

Please add Mexico to the map. The Mexican Senate officially recognized the Armenian Genocide a few days ago. Thank you!

Please remove Denmark from the map. Denmark hasn't recognized the Armenian Genocide. Thank you!

According to the source Denmark recognized the “deportations, massacres and other atrocities” that had been committed against the Armenian population Anatolia in 1915-1923, but they did not recognize the term "genocide". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.23.239.207 (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Map "Countries that explicitly deny that there was an Armenian Genocide" Please rewrite it by "Countries that explicitly deny the Armenian Genocide" Thank you! Beno13AM (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging buidhe, the map's creator. Are you still interested in keeping this updated? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added Mexico. The image description already has a source for Denmark. (t · c) buidhe 07:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to the source, Denmark does not recognize the term "genocide". They recognize “deportations, massacres and other atrocities”, but it is not correct that Denmark has recognized the Armenian Genocide. 89.23.239.207 (talk) 11:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I agree with the edits Willbb234 is making, and I suspect buidhe does too. I think that's sufficient WP:CONSENSUS to override Archives908's objections. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been waiting 5 months for a reply from to you. Care to respond above? Maybe you can provide (in detail) what this "consensus" entails? Archives908 (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've got consensus entirely backwards. The content needs consensus to keep it. Not every act of recognition is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia and of those that are, not all are wp:due for this article. It needs to be dramatically cut and rewritten based on scholarship. (t · c) buidhe 17:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reverted an IP who removed the word "gruesome" from a description of the genocide (in #Japan: ...was not involved in the European front of the conflict as Japanese activities concentrated around China and other Asian territories. However, during the gruesome genocide, the Japanese had first reported about it...). As I mentioned in the edit summary, killing 1.5 million people is pretty gruesome, but I'm not sure it does fit the neutral point of view even though most people would probably agree that the Armenian genocide was in fact gruesome. I've self-reverted for now as a result and opened this talk page discussion because I'm not the most knowledgeable on the subject. IMO, it sounds like something that should be said, but in wikivoice. Thoughts? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 17:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I don't know how this word is adding to reader understanding. And while most people would agree that mass murder is gruesome, there is no need to pick words that may compromise Wikipedia:IMPARTIAL tone. (t · c) buidhe 01:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I initiated this discussion because user:Firefangledfeathers and user:Archives908 removed the Israeli recognition from the article. The Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs recently officially recognised the Armenian genocide through a tweet. He published the tweet as an official statement in both Hebrew and English. The minister, responsible for managing foreign affairs, holds the authority to recognize such events. Historically, no other Israeli minister, especially not one in charge of foreign affairs, has made an official statement on the Armenian genocide. Israeli media covered this significant announcement [1] [2]. Some journalists even suggested that Turkey might cut its relations with Israel because of the statement. 81.199.249.44 (talk) 20:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cc @Firefangledfeathers @Archives908

(i wont partake in this dispute,I want this resolved) DarmaniLink (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tweet by one government official IS NOT official national recognition. That can only be done if the Israeli parliament passes legislation recognizing the events as a genocide. I will not entertain this ludicrous discussion. Archives908 (talk) 20:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The question of whether a state recognizes a genocide or not isn't dependent on parliamentary legalization. It's evident that you don't understand Israeli politics and the minister's authority. For instance, the U.S. Congress recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in 1995, but it was only in 2017 that Trump officially recognized it as the capital and relocated the embassy in 2018. 81.199.249.44 (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither source you link describes Katz's tweet as the government of Israel formally recognizing the Armenian genocide. Wikipedia should not be the first source to do so. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is Ariel Kahana, a famous Israeli journalist, explaining that this was an official recognition and the first statement ever made by an Israeli minister on this topic. 81.199.249.44 (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you're interpreting that tweet correctly, and it wouldn't be a strong source regardless. Let's wait and see how national and international news media cover this. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that international media would cover this. Here is another Israeli Journalist saying this statement was an official recognition of the genocide. 81.199.249.44 (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said I'd stay out of this, but, wanna just wait a day or two and see if it gets any intl. coverage? Given how much israel is in the news cycle right now, its possible it'll happen. DarmaniLink (talk) 21:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I want to do. To be clear, even prominent national coverage would probably merit at least a mention. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! Archives908 (talk) 23:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, so this seems like a matter of WP:TOOSOON then :)

User:81.199.249.44 Agree? Wait a day or two and revisit this? DarmaniLink (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was looking at the Armenian version of this page and saw that they included the Ottoman Empire in their list. I was wondering whether the Ottoman Empire should be added onto the list of countries that recognised the genocide or at least on a separate list with Artsakh and Libya. Thank You Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 11:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]