User talk:Ekem

Archives

Archive 101: 2005 to 2010

Hello! Your submission of Griftopia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – VisionHolder « talk » 10:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are still a few small issues that need to be addressed. I left details at DYK. You're almost there! – VisionHolder « talk » 16:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is all addressed now.Ekem (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ekem. You have new messages at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Carlson_Sparrow.
Message added 01:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 00:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ekem, we will soon be moving Hochmoselbrücke to a name conforming to the WikiProject Germany conventions. I welcome you to discuss the naming. (By the way, I know the area where the bridge is planned very well.) Regards, Eddyspeeder (talk) 13:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the mention of Rastrelli was an egregious mistake. Other than that, I have no objections. --Ghirla^-трёп- 18:12, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 September 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2011 Kenya pipeline fire, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Jayron32 17:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ekem, I got your name from the list of participants at WikiProject Medicine, as someone with an MD who specializes in gynaecology. I'm wondering whether you'd be willing to look at an article.

I've submitted Female genital mutilation for featured-article status. The nomination page is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Female genital mutilation/archive1.

I've approached it as a human-rights issue, rather than as a detailed medical article, and I'd like to keep it that way—a relatively short (4,000 words) general overview—so that it's as accessible as possible. However, a concern was raised on the FAC talk page (here) that the health consequences section may not be up-to-date or detailed enough. I think it is, but it would be very helpful if a qualified person could cast an eye over it to make sure there is nothing false or too simplistic, and no key issues missing.

Whether this is just an informal glance, or whether you leave a review on the FAC page itself—either of those would be extremely helpful. February 6 is the UN's International Day of Zero Tolerance to Female Genital Mutilation, so I was thinking it would be good to nominate it for the main page on that day, but it has to be a featured article to make it eligible.

If you're too busy, however, I'll completely understand, so please feel free to say no. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 20:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ekem, thank you, that would be wonderful. I'll try to use the Abdulcadir review (PMID 21213149) to say more about the repair aspects. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 16:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Ekem, thank you for all the work you did on this. As there were two objections to the nomination, one informal on the talk page, and one formal on the nomination page, I've withdrawn the nomination for now. I don't know whether I will want to renominate it. What I would like to avoid is medicializing it to the point where most readers would have difficulty understanding it, because I see it primarily as a major human rights issue where a broad appeal is important. I don't know whether I'd be able to manage that (in terms of the writing style, and the sources used), and still overcome the objections that were raised. However, if you want to continue to work on it—in whatever direction you choose to take it—that would be absolutely fine, and indeed very helpful.

Thank you again for the edits you made, and for your quick and kind response to the request for help. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 23:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're actively editing I'll come back and double check things later, just wanted to let you know there's a few typos in the changes you made. Also the article tends not to use the term "mutilation" or "mutilated" by itself because that might be seen as too POV. Vietminh (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As well, thank you for expanding on the health consequences, its much more informative now. Vietminh (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that there is a new freely accessible medical resource, MedMerits (to which I'm a medical advisor) on neurologic disorders. A discussion on ELs to MedMerits and medical ELs in general is currently in progress ("Wikipedia and its relationship to the outside world"). Presto54 (talk) 16:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ekem, I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser here at the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign we're seeking out and interviewing active Wikipedians like yourself, in order to produce a broader and more representative range of "personal appeals" to run come November. If you'd like to participate in this project, please email me at amuszalskiwikimedia.org. Interviews are typically conducted by phone or Skype and take between 30-90 minutes. Thanks! Aaron (WMF) (talk) 04:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You added in the subject article "According to the prime minister, Yousuf Raza Gilani, Zardari sought medical treatment outside of Pakistan because of "threats to his life" possibly due to his attempt to rein in the Pakistani military." and cited The Telegraph. But the telegraph report didn't mention prime minister saying this(possibly due to his attempt to rein in the Pakistani military.), so I have removed that part of it for now, if you feel I am wrong(undo it :)), we can discuss it at article's talk page. --SMS ^Talk 21:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion on possible deletion of the Francesco Schettino biographical article (currently a redirect to the article on the disaster) is underway at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Schettino. I see you've participated in discussions on this topic in the past and thought you might like to share your thoughts as well.--RadioFan (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That the use of tax havens contribute to inequality is not stated directly in the article, except as a quote of someone. You're right the usage of tax havens contributes to smaller revenue collected by the government, but I don't see the direct support of the connection to inequality in the article. Do you have a supporting article quote? Burritoburritoburrito (talk) 00:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ekem, some years ago you uploaded File:Oocyte.jpg. The license tag says you are the creator. Now, the article Hoffman modulation contrast uses this images as an example for this technique. This may be correct but I am wondering about it since the file legend does not list the technique with which it was recorded. Could you confirm that this image was made with HMC? Preferably in the legend itself. Thanks, --Dietzel65 (talk) 14:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would think so, but cannot say with 100% certainty, now, about a decade later. Ekem (talk) 04:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I really like the pictures of Old York Cellars and Unionville Vineyards. DavidinNJ (talk) 22:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• You are quite welcome. Great job on the NJ winery articles. Ekem (talk) 23:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Get free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

• Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
• Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
• If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ekem, I have added a number of new winery pictures to Category:Wineries in New Jersey on Wikimedia Commons. I have proposed changing the names of two of your pictures to be less generic. Contact me on Wikipedia (I rarely use Commons) if you have any comments. DavidinNJ (talk) 17:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Caesar's Rhine Crossing.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Caesar's.Rhine.Crossing.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Ciudad-del-este.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Clintonmill.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:ClintonNJ1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 April 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2014 Katanga train derailment, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

ThaddeusB (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elective caesarean section is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elective caesarean section until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you were a major contributor to the Cryolipolysis article in 2010.

I routinely bring articles up to GA on behalf of the article-subject in a COI capacity and am working on a draft Coolsculpting page. However, I am uncertain as to whether I am actually creating a "new" page, or if this is the same subject. Many sources seem to use Coolsculpting and Cryolipolysis synonymously and when you first contributed to Cryolipolysis the commercial product-aspect of it was not yet significant. The supplier Zeltiq had not gone public yet and the product had not become very popular until the following year (2011).

I was wondering if you had any thoughts on if we should have one page for Zeltiq, Coolsculpting, and Cryolipolysis or if there should be a couple pages, etc. CorporateM (Talk) 14:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is to keep coolsculpting and cryolipolysis on the same page. As I see it we are talking about the same thing, cryolipolysis the generic and technical term, and coolsculpting a (forgive me) "cooler" term more for advertising and promotion of cryolipolysis for cosmetic affects. "Coolsculpting" or "CoolScupting" also appears to be a trademark term, see here [1]. Zeltiq Aesthetics appropriately has its own page in WP, so equipment can be discussed there. Ekem (talk) 14:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am planning to nominate this article for DYK, but can you expand the article a little more? Therefore, it can be eligible enough to be featured on the Main page. --George Ho (talk) 06:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded it somewhat (there is not a lot known about it) - Thanks. Ekem (talk)

The reviewer said that there are still problems. Thanks for the cleanup though. --George Ho (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bureau 121, an article you created or expanded, was recently nominated to be on the Did you know? section of the Main Page! This section is where facts from recently created or expanded articles are shown. If it passes review, it will be shown prominently on one of the most viewed webpages on the Internet! If you have thoughts, questions or concerns, you can join the discussion here. Cheers! (The previous message was left by an automated bot. Did I make an error? Report it to my owner!)

—Cerabot (talk) 12:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ekem! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for alerting me to the global account unification process. I found one account (ru:wikipedia) using my user name that has not been established by me. Should anything about this being done?Ekem (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)@DerHexer:[reply]

As this account had no visible edits, I've usurped it. Your global account is hence completed. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great and thanks again.Ekem (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)@DerHexer:[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Bureau 121 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 07:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

look up the page at Binjamin Netanyahu. The beheading details are already there. Your edit reduplicated it.Nishidani (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been nice of you to inform me of the undelete discussion you initiated on Francesco Schettino. Seeing as how I was the one that made back into a re-direct, it would stand to reason I might have had something to add to that discussion. Geogene (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I assume that? You stated your point when you deleted the article based on the old discussion well knowing that much more had happened in the interim. You also had nothing else to say on the talk page. Ekem (talk) 01:18, 14 July 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Ekem

I hope you don't mind me adding a section to your talk page.

The issue to be brought to you attention concerns the world's first laparoscopic appendectomy.

You mentioned that Dr. Kurt Semm a German performed the procedure in 1980.

I have it on good authority that the procedure was actually performed by Dr. Atef Gabrael an Australian in 1976 in the state of New South Wales at Minchinbury Hospital.

Dr. Niynatt Khan, a gynecologist and obstetrician was doing a laproscopic procedure for what was thought to be an ovarian cyst. Discovered during the procedure that it was appendicitis and approached Dr. Gabrael who completed procedure (laparoscopic appendectomy).

What are you thoughts and considerations on the matter?

Thanks

David — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.211.43.7 (talk) 00:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David,

"Good authority" will not fly in Wikipedia. It needs to be substantiated with a reputable reference. Further, did Dr. G. do more of :these? Did he show to others that the laparoscopic approach is viable?

In any case, I would agree that his accomplishment should be mentioned if it is sufficiently documented. Ekem (talk) 02:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ekem

Sorry for the idiom "good authority." I've actually spoken with Dr. Gabrael and he still practices medicine. I'm not sure if it was documented. There might be hospital records but I don't know if I would be able to access them.

I may be able to approach Dr. Khan, he may still be alive and living in New South Wales.

Would some of these be sufficient, for instance if I could obtain hospital records or first hand accounts in writing.

Thanking you for your time

David — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.211.43.7 (talk) 04:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello David,

From the point of Wikipedia or any encyclopedia the event is hearsay unless documented and published. If it happened, it would still be publishable today. For this the hospital records would be very important as well as interviews with preferably both, Drs. Khan and Gabrael. If you can do this and publish it, great, - otherwise get in touch with a medical historian (many universities have a department or section dealing with medical history). If the records still exist, they can be reviewed. I hope this is possible before the trail of history disappears. Ekem (talk) 12:42, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
  • Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 13:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

Some of the material you included in the above article was copied from http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/fl-trump-airport-impacts-talk-20170124-story.html, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[2] I corrected this to antiparasitic. The patent is very clear about this being used for parasites as per the abstract and the primary patent file. There is mention of bacteria in passing as a secondary effect but not as part of the patent itself. 173.120.214.220 (talk) 22:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Ekem (talk) 12:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frankie Fredericks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Tribune. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on KPS Capital Partners, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.kpsfund.com/about/overview. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ekem. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Tryptofish (talk) 21:59, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Guayas (chief) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DannyS712 (talk) 01:12, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ekem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claas Relotius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Buck (journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Buck (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Stayer. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 3#Stayer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 01:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Somerset County, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedminster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cory's Brook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warren Township (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Louis Ferdinand of Prussia (1944–1977) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Louis Ferdinand of Prussia (1944–1977) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, change the red and white sectors in here: look at the files Emw-logo and 1952-55 EMW 340 Limousine, at Wartburg 2006-08.jpg. After that, convert EMW.jpg to svg form and publish it in Wikimedia Commons. --2001:999:73:46A3:434:F202:619:6261 (talk) 18:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mary French Rockefeller

added a link pointing to Huguenot, New York

YMCA of Greater New York

added a link pointing to Huguenot, New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have a question on your edit in Tiny-house movement, especially of this edit on March 5, 2009. Please read my note here. Thank you. --直蔵 (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I removed it. Ekem (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Appreciated your quick response.--直蔵 (talk) 00:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:DOB; in particular, Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public. (bold added) WP:IMDB is not a reliable source. A video on WP:YOUTUBE may be a reliable source, but in this case is not. Please only add dates of birth to BLPs when you have solid reliable sources for that information. Schazjmd (talk) 16:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dominick Dunne's Power, Privilege, and Justice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Found only passing mentions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Insubres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaius Flaminius.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Egyptian National Railways (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New Jersey Medical School, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elbtower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Internet Security Essentials has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Run-of-the-mill malware with no evidence of notability. Sources are mostly cybersecurity websites that will presumably publish how-to-guides on every bit of malware that comes to their attention

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:43, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]