User talk:Trailblazer101

Welcome to my Talk Page! If you are leaving a note, please remember to be civil and not to include any personal attacks, and please remember to sign your message. I am not available all the time due to my personal life and other commitments, though I will respond at a reasonable time; my time zone is displayed on my userpage for reference. At any point, I may choose to remove discussions that are concluded, as I do not prefer the archive system for my talk page. Past discussions may be found in the editing history, while WikiLove messages that I have received may be found here.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Trailblazer101 is busy off-on and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hi Trailblazer101. I'm in the process of removing all use of dailyentertainmentnews.com (and related domains) as a reference or link. It's been heavily spammed, and appears unreliable. I noticed that you added it to Christopher Reeve, which I've removed. [1][2] --Hipal (talk) 00:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no worries. I'm not too concerned about it. You're all good. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the page Good Fortune (film) and I was looking at Good Fortune's listing on Production Weekly's website, finding listings for January 11th and January 18. I wouldn't know how to get the information from those listings, since I'm broke lol. Know anyone with a subscription who can look at them for info and maybe put them in the article? Thanks. Have a great one! BarntToust^(Talk) 17:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I used to be subscribed to Production Weekly the past few years but I recently relinquished my subscription to save costs. I am unsure if anyone else currently holds a subscription. Sorry I'm not able to help, I know it can be very expensive. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

its ok. Im very patient and someones gonna need to add new stuff eventually. Cant keep it locked fotever. Tootles KryptonianHero (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we can if need be. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rick Flag Sr. (DC Universe) - Rick Flag Sr. looks like the first character that may qualify for a character article in the DCU? Ain't gonna try to crystal-ball this stuff, but when I read Grillo call him the "Sam Jackson-to the MCU" of the DCU, I just had to start an article. I've started a structure similar to Nick Fury (Marvel Cinematic Universe) for this character (hell, since Grillo said that Flag was like him), and I'd appreciate it if you might look over what i've set here so far, and maybe let others who work on the project know about this one. Hope you're doing well! BarntToust 23:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job! I'm glad to see another draft. I know it is likely going to be a while before this draft would meet the general eligibility for mainspace inclusion, although with how recurring Grillo's role seems to be (I could imagine him being in more content like Lanterns and Waller, etc), I think this is a good draft to start with for the DCU. I'll be sure to take a look at it over time. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

like I said, I was sold with the concept of making a draft since it has actual viability to be an article qualifier, when I read Grillo say that Flag was going to be to the DCU what Sam Jackson is to the MCU. Have a good one! (p.s. my bet is he'll be in Waller in some capacity.) BarntToust 00:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely, that was a good call. Take care, Barnt, and keep up the great work! Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed that you have been changing "though" to "although" recently and was wondering what you were basing that on. I think some of the times you have done that, especially when the word is in the middle of the sentence, have not been required. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I changed those instances because from my understanding, "although" is a more formal usage than "though" as a subordinate clause, as explained here. I'm sure I may have changed it where it may not have been as helpful, and if so, I have no problem if those instances are changed back. Trailblazer101 (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Though is definitely more common in informal speech, but I think both can be used in formal writing in different situations. Just wanted to check before changing anything back. - adamstom97 (talk) 12:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I was planning to start returning to some editing soon but with the new 2025 trailer figured I'd come back now to do a bit. Still will be slow back at it probably and likely won't hit my watchlist to review things. If there were any discussions or content you'd like me to look at let me know and I'll try and prioritize. Pinging Adamstom.97 so he knows too and can chime in. Seemed like you both were still actively editing. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good to hear from you. I'm not up-to-date on the Agatha page but otherwise have been keeping an eye on things. Tried to do some clean-up after the video today but didn't attempt to move things around in the development sections for the Phase articles. - adamstom97 (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I grabbed remaining bits from the Phase Seven draft and moved those where they had to go, and a few things on the Phase Five one over to Six. I think they all just need a look over for a copy edit. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heyo! Glad to hear from ya, Favre! I've mostly been doing routine work like copyediting and updates, though I don't think there have been any major conversations that have been had on the MCU side. There was a whole debacle at Talk:DC Studios but that was dealt with. The recent Marvel updates are a nice update for sure, so thanks for your help with those. A little bit ago I got the file mover rights, so I no longer have to bug you with those requests lol. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you checked out Minecraft: The Story of Mojang, an article that I recently did massive expansion on, and did some cleanup. Some of that cleanup you did was removing {{nbsp;}} magic words from between the 2--and--Player part of instances of 2 Player Productions. This system was originally added in by another editor, User:Rhain, (who I sorta became acquainted with from working on The Last of Us (franchise) topic articles, and a month or so ago I asked him to check out all the expansion work I did on Minecraft: The Story of Mojang) and I didn't think much of the nbsp; stuff that he added in. Come to think of it, I don't see a reason for it to be there in the first place, but I also don't see a reason for it to not be there. Any particular reason you thought it should be removed? Anyways, I don't have an opinion on inclusion or exclusion, I'm just wondering since your removal was contradictory to what Rhain added in, and I continued to sort of go with the system he was doing. Just something I'm quizzical about.

Hope you're doing well! If there's anything about the article you think I could improve, do tell me! (I'm only getting around to actually finishing up the DvD this weekend, so I'm going to flesh out the Content section next.) BarntToust 21:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I ran a script that typically adds these instances to prevent variables (such as "minutes" and "millions") from being separated from their numerical values. I have noticed this get misconstrued with actual titles of works and properties when numbers are included in them, although those are typically not needed (ie. I have seen it added to The Batman Part II. I don't have much of an opinion of whether it remains or not, it's really just something the script either was not made with that in mind or it just didn't recognize it. Also, I love the work you've dedicated to expanding upon the article! Keep up the great work! Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, makes sense. Rhain probably had a script running that put the {{nbsp;}} between the 2 and Player part of the production company, 2 Player Productions. I have noticed on the article on The Last of Us Part II, an article Rhain's involved with, the non-breaking spaces are similarly placed in instances of the title Part{{nbsp;}}II, so that's pretty similar to instances of The Batman Part II that you've recalled.

Thanks for the words of context, and thank you for the kind words about my work! Have a good one. BarntToust 17:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dude. We need to talk about Deadpool 3. Deadpool 4 is not happening. The website, Movie Web mentioned rumors. Kevin never actually confirmed Deadpool 4 or even Wolverine 4. Fox Marvel is done for, and Deadpool 3 is just a way to overdue something (thought it was used as a goodbye letter to the Fox Marvel stuff). Will you please redo my edit? It’s not based on my opinion. I wrote what is on the website.

Besides, we got MCU rebooting everything X-Men.

I hope you understand.Lenny7092 (talk) Lenny7092 (talk) 21:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of what the sources discussed is confirming anything and we are not saying they confirmed it. Reynolds simply expressed interest in returning for the future, possibly in a fourth film or another project. You have no source saying Deadpool 4 is not happening. All we know is there is potential interest in Reynolds returning. As for the X-Men reboot stuff, you comments and what you added are not necessary (and how do you know Marvel is done with Fox's content when they could (and have) had prior actors reprise older roles? Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan is not sure about this, though. He and Hugh Jackman can return in a MCU crossover, like how the Spider-Men from 2002-2007 and 2012-2014 series appeared in Spider-Man: No Way Home, but no fourth Deadpool film (or fourth Wolverine film. The Fox Wolverine characters are done). I mean, is Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 4 or The Amazing Spider-Man happening? No. Just returning characters.

Deadpool 3 is just an extension from the Fox Marvel movies that put a retrospective end to them. Deadpool 3 was never necessary after Disney bought Fox in 2019, anyway.

Plus, read this article: X-Men (film series). It says that Marvel Studios will be doing a reboot to the X-Men series made by Fox, as in for real, as in not continuing the Fox-Marvel-universes stuff anymore. As in being set in MCU’s Earth-616 (aka prime reality).

On a side note, I used Google to look up how reliable MovieWeb is. Many people don’t believe in what it says. It is basically speculation.

The thing is, you don’t have to make readers of the Wikipedia articles want to do a petition for Deadpool 4. Kevin Feige never confirmed there being Deadpool 4, anyway, you know. I don’t mind actors reprising their non-MCU character roles in Avengers movies, but still. The Deadpool movies need a real reboot from the MCU, anyway.

Lenny7092 (talk) Lenny7092 (talk) 21:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]