User talk:Taoiseach

Welcome!

Hello, Taoiseach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

Anonymous anonymous 09:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Please note that we create an article once only. If alternative titles are considered necessary, we use #redirect.

Excessive emboldening as in this state is almost as bad using all capitals. -- RHaworth 16:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Limerick city (including extended boundary) for deletion; before creating an article it is worth considering if the article name is common enough for someone to find it or will they type something simplier, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). Their are already two comprehensive articles on Limerick - re City of Limerick and County Limerick and editing should be confined to these. Thanks Djegan 21:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Gay Dublin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mh29255 (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Raidió X has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 10:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Top 40 Oifigiúil na hÉireann, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.digitalaudioproductions.com/top40.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Seacht, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tg4.ie/Bearla/inte/seacht/stud.htm. As a copyright violation, Seacht appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Seacht has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Seacht and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Seacht with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Seacht.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. GundamsЯus (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Metropolitan areas in Ireland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Metropolitan areas in Ireland. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: Taoiseach is the title of the head of the government of Ireland, and use that title as a username apperars to breach WP:USERNAME#Inappropriate_username, which covers "Misleading usernames: imply misleading things about the contributor. For example, misleading points of fact, an impression of undue authority, or the suggestion that the account is operated by a group, project or collective rather than one individual".. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

• If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
• If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
• You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide (external) references that the terms "Dublin-Belfast corridor" and "Cork-Limerick-Galway corridor" have a relevance and usage outside of Wikipedia. Djegan (talk) 00:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, so random lists of items with no encyclopedic content are not acceptable as articles.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Celtic language third level courses, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A quick note on categories. Categories tend to be largely hierarchical. This means that (for example) the "TV programs" category may have a sub-category called "Irish TV programs". If "The Late Late Show" is a member of "TV programs in Ireland", then there is no real need to also add it to "TV programs". Because it is ALREADY a member by virtue of inheritance from the parent category. Or, to put it in another way, this is perfectly fine:

 Category:TV Programs
   -> Category:TV Programs in the English language
      -> The Late Late Show
   -> Category:TV Programs in Ireland
      -> The Late Late Show

But this is somewhat redundant:

 Category:TV Programs
   -> The Late Late Show
   -> Category:TV Programs in the English language
      -> The Late Late Show
   -> Category:TV Programs in Ireland
      -> The Late Late Show

I point this out because you recently added certain programs to several categories. When they were already members of the relevant child-categories. This isn't really necessary, and can lead to over-categorisation. Guliolopez (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pop 4, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Whispering 04:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nuac.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cula-logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Seacht (drama), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just throwing a bunch of links on the page [1] is not very helpful to improving the article, although it may help show that the subject of the article is notable. The following links may help you to turn this into a real article.

• How to write a great article
• Material in articles must be verifiable
• Use credible sources
• How to use citations

Thanks for uploading File:Nuac.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 09:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of Irish counties by percentage of people with Irish language ability, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Irish counties by percentage of people with Irish language ability. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tckma (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of gay and lesbian resource centres in Ireland. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay and lesbian resource centres in Ireland. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Irish-Gaelic language albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Top 40 Oifigiúil na hÉireann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not meet the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wcheck (talk) 18:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The PDF 'ref.' indicated here doesn't 'work'. Likewise for the other edits by the IP. I tried to locate and rectify them before they were rev'd by LL, but couldn't. You may have more luck. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! Well done. RashersTierney (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps they would be better integrated as in-line citations rather than external links. What do you think? RashersTierney (talk) 16:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In-line citations yeah sure.

Done for Tipperary. Just a matter of copying and pasting for the rest. RashersTierney (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Fáilte romhat! RashersTierney (talk) 16:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The plural of "Gaelscoil" is not "Gaelscoils". It might be "Gaelscoileanna". Ditto for Gaelcoláiste. Laurel Lodged (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, there is a discussion on these contributions on the WikiProject Ireland talk page. --RA (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks RA. You just beat me to it! RashersTierney (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Conamara Theas, Taoiseach!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

reviewed now good may need more references

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galway City Gaeltacht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castlegar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have been following your recent edits and attempting to fix the references re the Gaelic speaking numbers. Referencing can be tricky but please:

• put ref tags around the reference thus <ref>The reference info</ref>
• put the web address, title of the article, publisher and date of retrieval per my edit here
• place this immediately after the text that's being referenced rather than elsewhere in the article.
• Thanks. Ben MacDui 13:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding very poorly formatted informtion to articles such as Outer Hebrides. Thank-you. Ben MacDui 14:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top 40 Oifigiúil na hÉireann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 40 Oifigiúil na hÉireann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 18:56, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metropolitan Cork, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mallow, Bandon and Charleville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Breton language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|} :'''4''' Non-written lenition of ''ch, c’h, f, s'' and spirantization of ''p'' > ''f'' [v]. :'''21''' Spirantization of ''t'' > ''z'' [h]. Breton grammar in French, with glossed examples and typological comparisons), IKER, CNRS, 2009].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the source for these statistics? Please provide a citation for them. ww2censor (talk) 10:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ireland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 10:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have again reverted your edit on Limerick. What you add is a load of own research, as your source does not back up what you are stating in the edit. The Banner talk 05:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner:

Yes re-addition and removal of an actual source seems to the next piece. Taoiseach dont add OR and dont remove sources that factually contrdict your OR. Murry1975 (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Murry1975 (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Second city of the United Kingdom. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Murry1975 (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dublin is not in the UK, it can not be the second city. It is not in Russia, it can not be the second city. It is not in Australia, it can not be the second city. Sorry for sounding stupid, but touché. Murry1975 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A number of your recent changes have relied on a reference which is broken. You can see that if you look at the article after your changes, for example this version of South East England. Please sort out your referencing and check that it works before you try similar edits again. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - You still don't have a working reference, so your edits are unacceptable. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the regional GDP table in Economy of Wales, with modifications and a working ref link. I agree though that as a long-standing editor with hundreds of contributions, we would expect you to ensure accurate references in your own editing, so that others don't have to clear up after you. I suggest you take a look at Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Thank you: Noyster (talk), 14:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at West Midlands (region). - Why are you still adding content without a working reference? - David Biddulph (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to S4C may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
*In 2013/2014, S4C only had '''286''' programmes with (>70,000) *only '''54''' programmes with (>100,000) *TG4 had '''1,102''' programmes with (>70,000) *and '''619''' with (>100,000)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Dublin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IFSC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Dublin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Botanical Garden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Little Island Business Park, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.liba.ie/overview.php.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Taoiseach. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, National Technology Park, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ueutyi (talk) 21:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Taoiseach,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Westpark Shannon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 22:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Opera Lane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Cork, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spike Island and Mercy Hospital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Munster page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dublin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Temple Bar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Economy of Dublin

added a link pointing to D1

Leinster

added a link pointing to Tivoli Theatre

List of cultural venues in Ireland

added a link pointing to Tivoli Theatre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. Me again. I notice that you read and removed my previous comment on the same topic, but I was wondering if you'd had a chance to think about my suggestion? Of using prose over lists and adding context/relevance instead of just listing stuff? I ask because I notice that you've added more "list data" to the Economy of Ireland article - and I wonder if it's well placed. (I am not certain that a typical reader will gather from the "table" what relevance or selection criteria are applied to the list of "business parks"?) I'd welcome your thoughts - before I take my own action to perhaps improve those additions (relative to the relevant guidelines) Guliolopez (talk) 16:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following-up on the above, I have opened a thread on here, that may be of interest. Guliolopez (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Taoiseach, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Economy of the Republic of Ireland has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Iarnród Éireann has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. The table you added is not supported by the source. stop adding poorly sourced material. Murry1975 (talk) 15:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cultural venues in Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cultural venues in Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit archives, and do not edit logged out. To answer your question look at IBMs entry,Silicon docks 3000 yet "workforce of over 3,000 employees working across a broad range of businesses and locations including: IBM Ireland, which has nationwide responsibilities for delivering sales, marketing and services across the Irish market; the company's Technology Campus in Mulhuddart", my emphasis, but you see Mulhuddart aint in the city centre, so with an accurate source for EACH entry the list is not a benefit to the article. Similar to other lists you have added in the past. Murry1975 (talk) 22:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure, but I was just adding it to Silicon Docks because I saw the same list on a very similar Israeli wikipage Silicon Wadi. 23:21, 2 April 2016‎ Taoiseach (talk | contribs)‎

Do not add something that is incorrect and be surprised when it is challenged or removed. Murry1975 (talk) 22:32, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anocht FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anocht FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 21:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of European city regions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of European city regions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Batternut (talk) 16:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Atlantic Quarter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This development will never be built. The developer has gone into administration, the land has been sold off, and planning permission for the proposals expired in 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 13:30, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]