User talk:JJARichardson

Archives

Archive 1

Thanks for uploading File:LPUK Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see a fellow Richardson on Wikipedia, especially one who's user page states so many things that i also agree with. Mabuska ^(talk) 00:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed your article on hold so that you can address some concerns. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 00:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We were wondering if you wanted to participate in the review? User:Moxy has addressed some of my concerns. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kurt Cobain mugshot 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir Richardson
I note your corrs to my 1st para here Captain Beefheart.
The main point I am trying to make early here (I touch upon it in a later edit) is the FACT that the band are titled in two different forms. "His" & "The".
Whilst it may seem superficial at first glance, it does seem to have profound effect on how some discographies of his work are constructed.
"The" is the primary reference, whilst "His" was a short-lived 'fad'. It is also a distinct 'tracker' to the release of archived works.
It also strongly indicates Beefheart's emergence from simply being a band member & a recognition of the members 'in their own right'
i.e. "Captain Beefheart & His Magic Band" to "Captain Beefheart" & "The Magic Band"
Maybe you can consider?
Thanks Webcor (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You are aware that Janet is later to become writer & co-writer of works? (aka Jan Van Vliet)
That's the reason I introduced her (& the timing of their marriage) which coincides with his solo departure...
Webcor (talk) 00:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Richardson
Thanks for the style pointers. A veritable 'newbie' & not yet 'Wiki literate, I shall apply myself to it forthwith.
Guidance always much appreciated.
Question: Understand the 'title' of a recording is italic, with its tracks in quotes - however, for singles should the titles not be in italics? (As this is the 'title' of the work) I'm a bit confused on that one!
Regards Webcor (talk) 02:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sir Richardson
A number of singles, I refer to, are 'stand alone' titles and not issued from albums. Thus, I believe they need to be italicised (for the A-sides at least)?
Webcor (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add this artist to the Wiki User:Webcor/Jan Van Vliet
Links awaiting in Captain Beefheart article. Advice/help appreciated.
It appears there is already a different Jan van Vliet - I am now unable to add (musician) to header (for example), to my work. Guidance appreciated.
Webcor (talk) 05:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...a big thankyou for bothering to do that. Rothorpe (talk) 02:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, Nirvana (band) is now comprehensive, if you want to drop by the FARC again. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kennethanger.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 18:54, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently claimed that the addition of David Icke to the category Antisemitism in the United Kingdom was "unfounded, libelous and POV". However, it is a matter of historical fact that 1) antisemitism in the United Kingdom is an acceptable category, and 2) David Icke has promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories in his books, such as claiming that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is real, and he has flirted with Holocaust revisionism, etc. If you disagree with that category, perhaps you can recommend another category that is reflected by the sources? Viriditas (talk) 01:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir Richardson. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:01, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So many! So confusing! what are you :P! ?Alexandre8 (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir Richardson,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:North America satellite orthographic.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 15, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-07-15. howcheng {chat} 17:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, where do you get the receipts' source? Can you please source this edit? I have a different number from the 6/30 source [1]. Thanks. Divide et Impera (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Enoch Powell 6 Allan Warren.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular talk 15:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jacob,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:South America - Blue Marble orthographic.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 28, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-09-28. howcheng {chat} 20:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to review this article. I noticed straight away that the lead is too short per WP:WIAGA section 1b. As this is an important criteria to meet I will await for this to be fleshed out before continuing with the review. Regards AIRcorn (talk) 03:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished the review and unfortunately at this time I do not think it reaches good article standard. I have left tips for improvement on the talk page. AIRcorn (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Ron Paul is one of the 20 most admired men in the world according to the highly respected gallup poll of americans and the only congressman to achieve that distinction is an extremely prestigious and notable honor that should not just be arbitrarily removed from his article. Twonumbers (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AlbertoKordaModified.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jacob,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:CharltonHestonCivilRightsMarch1963Retouched.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 4, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-10-04. —howcheng {chat} 21:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who is listed as a participant for WikiProject Poetry, I hope you will be interested to learn of an attempt to revive the WP and alongside this the creation of task force to improve coverage of The Canterbury Tales. We are currently looking for participants to help set up the basics. Please get involved if you can, and we can hopefully revive this important project within Wikipedia! Many thanks, MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 18:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JJ,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Enoch Powell 6 Allan Warren.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 08, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-02-08. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you ever need a picture restored or looked at for FPC, let me know. You have a good eye for finding a good picture, just a matter of whether any issues can be dealt with. =) Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adam. There is another image that I'd appreciate your restoration of, which is another photo Voltarine de Cleyre:

Perhaps it could even be nominated for featuring in a separate nom to the other? JJARichardson (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Neil Armstrong.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Elvis-nixon.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Voltairine de Cleyre (Age 35).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JJ,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Voltairine de Cleyre (Age 35).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 8, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-03-08. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AngerFireworks.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just started with the lead, have left it at that while people take a look and, if no-one has any objections, I will carry one tomorrow, or later tonight if I get a quick reply :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 20:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting those additions (Parson's->Parsons') - that was a bad error on my part.

In my defence ... nope lol, should have caught that myself. Chaosdruid (talk) 10:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no worries. It happens to the best of us. JJARichardson (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I came in a couple of times last night, but saw you were working on the article, so left it - RL took most of today, just went to look and noticed you are working on it. I'll leave it for a few hours again. Chaosdruid (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see...when I'm done with my edits for now I'll give you the heads up. JJARichardson (talk) 19:45, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for that, will carry on in a cpl hours (19:00 BST) and will drop you a note here once I start, just in case :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will be starting in 10 mins Chaosdruid (talk) 18:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Apologies PC issues left me with no keyboard (using character map and my mouse to write this) - hopefully fixed in a whileChaosdruid (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, that situation must be a serious pain. My best wishes that it's resolved. JJARichardson (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, USB problems fixed, back sorted, RL commitments cleared, free to edit. I will start in an hour or so, just single sections which I will put the GOCE tag on so you know where I am working - that way you can work on other sections without me affecting you. Chaosdruid (talk) 13:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to try a couple of hours yesterday, but noticed you had been working on the article, so left it until today. I will start on 1.4 - 1.7 after the Grand Prix at around 15:00 UTC. Chaosdruid (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished the main copyedit run, and ran scripts (as noted on the talk page). I have also asked a coordinator to take a look as it is my first major edit after a break, and am intending to take another read through tomorrow to make sure I didn't miss anything, as well as make any changes off that talk-page list that we agreed to.

Best wishes, and thx for the x-metal comment - I do have to wonder what he wanted that for though! Great article, well-written, really interesting with some interesting facts and links and a great insight into the start of the "Sci-Fi religions". Chaosdruid (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the lack of communication, as well as the time it took to get the copyedit done. I have had a few RL issues, and will have to call it quits on the article for now. I had hoped to get back to it over the last two weeks, but I fear that is not going to happen unfortunately. I have explained my situation more thoroughly on the GOCE coordinators page and linked it as I feel you also deserve an explanation.

I have loved reading the article, I thought "hey, a rocket scientist, that will be cool", then JPL, Thelemites, open relationships & "witchcraft", intrigue, and Ron Hubbard - I have never told so many people about a Wiki article before! Thanks for being so understanding, and I hope you manage to get it through FA before I return! Chaosdruid (talk) 12:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in my past quality improvement projects.

I've replied to your query, at my user talk page.

Have a great day,

— Cirt (talk) 17:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Parsons (rocket engineer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to comment there. Otherwise I intended to quickfail this article, per reasons stated. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Michel Foucault you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Brigade Piron -- Brigade Piron (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 17:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michel Foucault you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Michel Foucault for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Brigade Piron -- Brigade Piron (talk) 13:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cory Doctorow#Cory Doctorow and Creative Commons. Thanks. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 01:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WWE is the abbreviation. World Wrestling Entertainment is what WWE means. Like how, NFL is short of National Football League. (T23tran (talk) 23:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Parsons (rocket engineer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Zucker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on getting Jack Parsons (rocket engineer) to FA status. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the beer. It would preferably be a Crabbie's, perhaps one of the fruit-flavoured varieties. JJARichardson (talk) 13:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did consider a GA nomination myself, but thought it might be a bit early to do it. I'm very happy for you to take it through the process though and will help if I can. I wrote the article with the GA and FAC criteria in mind so with luck it won't need a lot doing to it. Good luck, This is Paul (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Parsons (rocket engineer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your outstanding contributions for Featured Pictures in 2014 you are hereby award this WikiProject Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 08:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. I didn't think that my first barnstar would come from the military history people! JJARichardson (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless laziness gets the best of my I usually take a lap at the end of the year to check the articles, lists, topics and pictures that get promoted to Featured status and match the relevant material against our project. If the material is within our scope then I add the editor's name to a list of contributors who should be recognized for the contributions to military history. In this case, two of your featured picture credits for 2014 - Neil Armstrong after moonwalk and Richard Nixon and Elvis Presley - pinged on my review radar, in the former case because Neil Armstrong was an officer in the US Navy before joining NASA, and in the latter case because Nixon served in the US Navy before becoming president. In both cases, your contributions for the project were noted, thus you were awarded a barnstar from us for helping us even though it appears that you were unaware of the assistance you provided. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:JJARichardson. I removed your additions of the criminal groups, so Please comment at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#.2F.2A_Nick_Griffin_.2A Govindaharihari (talk) 07:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a general rule, categorising a living person as a criminal should be done cautiously and sparingly due to the WP:BLP issues involved. A person with a minor conviction is technically a criminal, but it may not be what they are best known for. The discussion about Dave Lee Travis at the BLP noticeboard looks at this issue.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:14, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Criminals from Derbyshire, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Govindaharihari (talk) 03:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The National (Scotland) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article The National (Scotland) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The National (Scotland) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article The National (Scotland) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The National (Scotland) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bullet Club you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bullet Club you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bullet Club for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 04:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bullet Club you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bullet Club for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is banned as the "Michigan Kid". This time, his edit was appropriate, so I don't mind your reinstating it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Jeremy Corbyn. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

• To my own amazement I've actually been doing this for seven years. I apologize for being uncivil but your reverting seven times is definitely edit warring. JJARichardson (talk) 21:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JJA! Regarding Crowley and "New Age", I'm really not sure if the link between the two is strong enough to warrant the actual inclusion of this box. The New Age (movement) draws heavily upon a huge range of earlier esoteric and in particular occult influences, but of them Crowley is certainly not a major influence, whereas (for instance) Theosophy and New Thought were. If you look at the academic studies of the New Age phenomenon by the likes of Hanegraaff, Heelas, or Sutcliffe you will see plenty of mentions of Swedenborg and Blavatsky but very few of Crowley. Crowley was instead a far greater influence on esoteric currents like Wicca, Chaos Magic, modern religious Satanism, and various other forms of ceremonial magic. Thus, I do think that the tag is superfluous here. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Bacon by Gray 257.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Allen Ginsberg 1979 - cropped.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JJA,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Elvis-nixon.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on December 21, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-12-21. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Could you point me to a rule which states that this category "is for real life subjects" only? If there is such a rule, we will also have to remove (for instance) Category:Child abuse in fiction from Category:Works about child abuse (because the latter is a subcategory of Category:Child abuse).

Thanks. Apokrif (talk) 16:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like a stretch of logic. It is appropriate for a piece of fiction about child abuse to be included in a category about child abuse in fiction, as a subcategory of general child abuse topics. However the category "Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom" is about actual real life cases of CSA, which is why a novel should not be there. JJARichardson (talk) 19:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hitler classification (criminal), I had already put a message on the article talk page as to whether the classification is apt. My reasoning is that 'criminal' as a noun, usually refers to a professional criminal, rather than anyone who has, at some time, been convicted of a crime or spent time in prison (Gandhi? Mandela? + many other political figures, both attractive and notorious). Had AH lived of course he would have been tried (and almost certainly found guilty), of war crimes. But let us see what other editors think about the aptness of the classification. Pincrete (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC) btw the category itself seems random, Marcus Harvey is there (for mail fraud), but Al Capone isn't, nor most of the notorious professional/notorious criminals of the century.Pincrete (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JJA,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Neil Armstrong.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on August 5, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-08-05. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1500 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Sorry I missed this before. :) JJARichardson (talk) 20:33, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. ―Mandruss ☎ 18:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's a good solution. JJARichardson (talk) 19:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am Weiwen Leung, a student at the University of Minnesota. I am currently conducting a study on how people on the LGBT+ Wikipedians group use and contribute to Wikipedia.

Would you be willing to answer a short 5 minute survey? If so, please email me at leung085@umn.edu. It would be helpful if you could include your Wikipedia username when emailing.

Thank you, Weiwen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 09:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Political positions of Jeremy Corbyn#Corbyn's views on immigration. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libertarian Party (UK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party (UK) (6th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ralbegen (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Jeremy Corbyn without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for you to repeatedly declare consensus. Once is enough. Please don't do it again. I've never seen that done repeatedly in a discussion. It's bad enough that you made edits to the article that likely impacted the discussion. Are you so afraid that you won't get your way that you have to repeatedly declare consensus? Sundayclose (talk) 20:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Kanye West. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. I've re-added {{very long}}. Regarding Barack Obama, please see WP:OSE; although the readable prose size of that article is only 84K, feel free to add {{very long}} there too if you wish. If you still feel strongly that the template should be removed from Kanye's page, please first establish consensus on Talk:Kanye West. Thank you! —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:34, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. That is an appropriate warning, as explained here. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flyer22 Frozen: OK; maybe I was indeed wrong. I appreciate your constructive criticism. I've crossed the warning out using strikethrough. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Critics of the European Union has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[2] so people can see what you're doing without needing to review each diff ~Awilley (talk) 15:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Awilley, I should have marked it as a minor edit in this instance but I will bear it in mind. JJARichardson (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I still have this on my watchlist but hadn't had time to check much recently. I notice some anonymous edits from April, one of which introduced the overview heading that you've rightly removed -- are you able to check those other ones, as I'm not sure if they improved the article either? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The other edits are copy edits and look fine to me. JJARichardson (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Streak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ★Trekker (talk) 17:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transgender genocide has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 21:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]