User talk:Silver Edge

Welcome!

Hello, Silver Edge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 08:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want to talk about Neo Roanoke, a fictional character from Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Destiny. Seeing that Neo is Mu La Flaga himself (revealed later on), I can only wonder about the reason that you insist to redirect it to List of Gundam SEED characters instead. --Blackhawk charlie2003 14:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Ocean Group, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ocean Group. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 02:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Silver Edge! Thank you for reverting vandalism to Wikipedia. After you revert, I would recommend also warning the users whose edits you revert on their talk pages with an appropriate template or custom message. This will serve to direct new users towards the sandbox, educate them about Wikipedia, and a stern warning to a vandal may prevent him or her from vandalizing again. Thanks! Wavemaster447 03:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---Correction: I used the wrong template - sorry. What I meant to ask is that when you warn vandals, please do not give them all 4 warnings in the same edit. Also, please sign your name after the warnings. Happy reverting! --Wavemaster447 01:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the large amount of cleanup work you did on this. Edward321 13:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why you got rid os the chunk of text in the GSD article reffering to Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Club Yonkoma?--Tempest115 13:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this modification, note that we need to duplicate the reference. The Disney sales must point to the archived version, because that is where the data is, while all the others must point to the current one. If we mix both references in one, it means we are using the archive for all of them, which is not true. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo 02:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have suggested a modification to the {{cite web}} template to add a parameter for dead references. Hopefully that will prevent having both a reference and a {{fact}} tag in the reference. -- ReyBrujo 02:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noted that you tagged a pile of categories beginning with "Historico-medical" for deletion as misnamed. I'm not contesting the tags (in fact, it meets CSD C2), but I'd appreciate it if you would tell me the new name(s) for the categories to be renamed, so that I can rename the categories rather than merely deleting them. Thanks, Nihiltres^(t.l) 14:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a lot. Cheers- CattleGirl ^talk 08:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of weapons packs in Gundam Series, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of weapons packs in Gundam Series is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of weapons packs in Gundam Series, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that a vandal created your user page, and now it lies blank, with no content. Would you prefer that it be deleted? -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Happy editing. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not categorize it as detective fiction. This category is for the pages relevant to the genre as a whole (subgenres, etc). All particular instances (novels, stories, cartoons, anime, etc) are better categorized according to their media, thus Case Closed is in Category:Mystery anime and manga. Otherwise the category becomes unmanageable and useless. Thank you. Henry Merrivale 02:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you were doing was redirecting the article to the list page, so if anyone tried to click on the link, they'd just go right back to the list page. You literally had it linked to the page that was the link. HalfShadow 00:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you making reversions like this and this with the edit summary "all the other discontinued console articles uses 'was'". Have you ever checked that assertion? In fact, of the consoles listed on Template:Dedicated video game consoles, only Vectrex, NES, and SNES state "was a video game console" rather than "is a video game console". A few others have some variation on "was X's nth video game console", which is a statement of status rather than a simple category membership.

I don't particularly care whether you go through and change all the other articles to "was", or change the three to "is", or bring up the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games to get a wider consensus than just yourself. But please stop making false claims. Thank you. Anomie 11:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't change the number of units sold, if you look at the differences I only inserted 1080i into the hardware section. Thank You -- Vdub49 17:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

alright, my bad I thought you were saying I did, I misread it. -- Vdub49 22:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem? It is true, why did you erased that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.193.117.66 (talk) 22:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your edit summary was confusing and seemed to contradict with your edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Mario_64&diff=prev&oldid=166846565, and what do you mean by "it is the most downloadable title in the Virtual Console"? If by that you mean Super Mario 64 is the most downloaded title on the Virtual Console, then cite your source since it needs to be verified before being included. --Silver Edge 00:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I undid your edit to the talk page and posted a short response instead which politely discouraged turning the talk page into a discussion forum. I think we should be careful not to bite the newbies. I'm not sure this is what you had in mind, but I think this better handles the situation. Drumpler 08:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed that section because based on Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines: "Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal." I probably should of been more specific in my edit summary. --Silver Edge 02:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the halo article I undid your revision because it looked "like" vandalism. I couldn't tell, as there were strange characters inserted in multiple places in your edit. If I was wrong then I apologize, just re-add what you had. businessman332211 04:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i saw your note when you did the re-undo. I apologize for the mistake, I looked through your contributions, and everything you done has been good so far. Again, apologies for the misunderstanding. businessman332211 04:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, these things happen. --Silver Edge 04:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If only there was a easier way to spot spaces being added in to an article in a diff. --Silver Edge 04:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Regarding the "See also" edit, I'm curious why you left Pocket Fighter. Cheers:) JuJube 02:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see... just so you know, I don't oppose the edit (I actually think it's about time), I was just wondering if you left Pocket Fighter just so the Wikiquote template would have a place to hang around. If that was the case, I thought Street Fighter was probably a better link. JuJube 02:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		For doing all the little changes to spruce up the Street Fighter (series) character articles.

JuJube 05:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The MOS applies to articles; welcome messages and help pages can follow more informal rules of usage. Λυδαcιτγ 05:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Get ready for a fight... sort of. People seem to like to wait until they think no one's paying attention and then readd that Trowa/Duo stuff. JuJube 10:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was Genesis in North America, not "Mega Drive", so please don't change it again. TJ Spyke 00:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warm welcoming! :) Zombie007 (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching my mistakes, reformatting my changes so they actually look good, and finding and rooting out those unsuspicious errors in the article, and of course all your vandalism reverts. It's really fun editing when you're online! clicketyclick_yaketyyak 23:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, thought I'd confirmed that sales figure was for the game, not the series. My bad. But I updated the Dynasty Warriors series article with an updated figure from Koei's corporate page. --Tntnnbltn 12:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I swore I did that. I must've been really off my game last night! Anyway, thanks. --Tntnnbltn 11:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a point there, I adapted that part from the introduction of StarCraft, so it will need changing there as well. SC is certainly ranked up near the top of bestselling PC games, but it does need a reliable source for an exact statement of rank. How about the wording "one of the best selling PC games of all time", that acknowledges that its exact position is in flux, but still maintains that its in the top bunch. -- Sabre 11:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The VG Barnstar
		For all the little edits in just about every video games related article out there, and for correcting the grammatical errors that I unwittingly introduce, I award you this barnstar. Thingg (talk) 15:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, noticed your {{inuse}} tag while making a big change. Want to finish checking all the references, updating the accessdate for them, and transforming {{cite web}} to {{cite press release}} where necessary? I can continue adding some new franchise values I have around, all with between 5m and 9m units. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, took the franchise list to do that. Do you want to convert the full list of video games instead from one template to the other? -- ReyBrujo (talk) 03:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, you can go top to bottom, and once I finish I can work bottom to top so that we don't clash. Put an {{inuse-section}} tag at the section you are working, and a {{underconstruction}} at the top of the article. That should prevent edit conflicts. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 04:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, note that I chose those names because they were the ones found in List of Famicom games and the chronological lists, Chronological list of Famicom games, 1983-1988 and Chronological list of Famicom games, 1989-1994. If you plan on changing those names, please also change the ones in the lists so that whenever an article is created, all the lists point to the same one. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo (talk) 07:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please actually read the changes that were made before you revert them and ask for a citation. The change in question was just a rewording that was needed because a new year has arrived.

209.94.133.40 (talk) 15:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Why is The NES Files (www.nesfiles.com) considered link spam? It links to quality NES manuals(PDF scans that took hundreds of man hours to scan one by one!) for download-- providing quality content to users of Wikipedia. I have tried linking for individual games as well and these are removed as well, although other similar links remain(neshq.com, mobygames, etc.). Please allow my quality non-spam links or delete all other external links as well. Consistency is all I ask for. Thank you.

Dkalweit (talk) 21:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)dkalweit[reply]

I reverted your addition of the nesfiles.com link as per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, WP:External links#Advertising and conflicts of interest, and WP:Spam#External link spamming, since adding nesfiles.com links to the "External links" section of articles are the only substantial edits you have made up to that point, causing me to believe you have a conflict of interest; although, I will be more than happy to be proven wrong. Also please do not mark edits as minor when they are not, based on Help:Minor edit. Happy editing! --Silver Edge (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Minor edit page clearly says adding links qualifies as a 'minor edit'. Maybe this page is unclear about external links.

I fail to see how adding linked quality content that the target user of the page will be interested in(manuals for the games on the system; or the specific game manual on appropriate pages) is link spam-- regardless if anything else was added to the page itself. My quality addition to Wikipedia is links to the manually scanned PDF manuals of the games. Most sites only offer inferior text versions of the manuals. Thinking about it from the end-user perspective, I can't see how your position on this specific situation helps them.

Dkalweit (talk) 14:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem to be Gundam Seed's main editor, I'll ask here. For the special editions, Bandai has been releasing them as Movies. Do you think we should rename the articles to "Mobile Suit Gundam SEED: Movie" (the Destiny SE as well) to match what Bandai is calling it? Also, thanks for copy editing my stuff. Rezumop (talk) 03:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I believe there was no Aussie or UK release because there's nothing on their website. The name on the Japanese Sunrise site is "Special Edition" but Bandai named it "Movie". Rezumop (talk) 07:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Special Edition is the official title seen here. 機動戦士ガンダムSEED スペシャルエディション romanized is Kidou Senshi Gundam SEED Supesharu Edishon. I guess Bandai changed it to match the name of the original Gundam movie. Rezumop (talk) 08:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what sources you are looking for on the Durandal's politics section. You add a tag that there are no sources, and then proceed to delete sources posted in the section. This puzzles me because the source is NOT a wiki but the quote IN the wiki which is in fact directly from the series. So, the source is actually the series itself.

The series shows Durandal looking looking at the Destroy in either Phase 27 or Phase 28. So, I'm removing the tag until some sort of rationalization is provided. I did add one source though, but I'm sure you'll delete that one too since it isn't 'official' :P

I mean by its very nature a lot of this stuff CAN'T have a source because there isn't much official documentation provided on characters like Durandal. Therefore, I think simply referring to the series is itself sufficient. 69.243.158.192 (talk) 10:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the barnstar. Happy editing! P.S. I'm looking at submitting PlayStation 3 to FAC after it gets GA, which I nominated earlier today. (I'm pretty sure it will pass. It is reasonably well written and is better cited thn any article I've ever seen. (179 citations that take up approx. 32KB) Anyway, thought I'd let you know. Again, thanks for the barnstar. Thingg^⊕⊗ 20:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you do a lot of work on the PS3 article, and I thought you should know it became a Featured Article today. Keep up the good work!!! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see it. Thank you! --Usien6 (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!! Happy editing! *disclaimer* The previous two words were shamelessly plagarised from the great Silver Edge */disclaimer* Thingg^⊕⊗ 04:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I award you the pictureless and templateless Barnstar of Tirelessly COntributing to the Pokemon Mystey Dungeon 2 Article! This is a barnstar, really, I mean it... Kimera Kat (talk) 22:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you suggest we can the ratings sources when we take them from the Chinese pages of Wikipedia. Plus, even if we were to find the sources on the ratings for this year. Where do you suppose we'll get it from the years before. The pages with the ratings would have already expired. Wikipedia has policies, and one of them is to ignore all policies when appropriate. I think it would be appropriate to that now. This message is based on your edits on the List of TVB series (2008), List of TVB series (2007), List of TVB series (2006) articles. --Shaggy9872004 (talk) 05:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re

As I've said, if you're following rules - great! no problem, what you're doing is what I'd be doing under those circumstances. However wikipedia has a rule called "Ignore all rules and you can view that if you want to. Under these circumstances, what we're putting down is not malicious or an issue of copyright, we're ttrying to build a better online encyclopaedia. Sure, it would be better if we had a source, but not all are obtainable. Assume good faith and be bold when editiing is just to of the phrases I can describe this little bit. I think that for the better of wikipedia being a better article in all, we'd better leave this matter at that, what do you think? Give me a reply soon.--Shaggy9872004 (talk) 07:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently reverted one of my edits on the N-Gage page stating the source I provided isn't "official enough". In such a case - can this be considered an official source? It states that N-Gage is a gaming service. Further in the article it mentions the word "platform". Also the dispute whether the new N-Gage games are considered mobile games or handheld game console games is present. I myself however would classify the new N-Gage closer to mobile game market than to handheld game console market since this time N-Gage isn't a dedicated device but more of a service similar to Xbox Live. Speaking of Xbox Live: the new N-Gage in combination with it's online component - the N-Gage Arena - can be considered akin to the likes of Playstation Network or the mentioned Xbox Live because of it's nature. --IJK_Principle (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, NPD usually does release their sales info every month. TJ Spyke 06:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the last year, I only recall 1 time we didn't get the monthly NPD report from NPD Canada. TJ Spyke 08:37, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noted the gameguide tagged placed on Big_Brain_Academy:_Wii_Degree and read the suggested guidelines. I discussed my newfound knowledge at Talk:Big_Brain_Academy:_Wii_Degree#Platinum_Medals and have removed the specific scoring requirements from the paragraph in question. Can you revisit the article? Regards, --Daddy.twins (talk) 15:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't have moved it in the first place. Not only is it spelled incorrectly, the page title ends with a period, which isn't standard for Wikipedia content. Sony refers to the model in the PAL territories as the Slim and Lite. Not Light. --GSK (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well first of all, I'm not the one that moved PlayStation Portable Slim and Lite to PlayStation Portable Slim and Light., so please assume good faith. I'm in the process of getting it moved back to the correct article name at WP:RM#Uncontroversial proposals. Copy and pasting the text is the incorrect way of moving it back to the correct article, see WP:MERGE#How to rename a page. --Silver Edge (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was the on who misspelled 'lite' and ended the title with a full stop. I was reverting the previous vandalism to the title, and the correct original title wasn't available for reference within the page so I retyped the title. My mistakes were not deliberate vandalism. Sorry for the confusion. Derekhtodd (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was not available for 1 month due to me being in hospital. Coming to the table. I dislike the original laid table it is ugly and it is not at all clear. The new table is clean and well laid out. Sure making a small mistake can cause table to go haywire. I guess people like you wanted to go easy not harder. The table is meant to be harder for new ones. It was difficult for me at first now it is nothing. Fine. Go to 2008 in film users over there is having no problems on editing. I do not know why you 3 of your buddies are having this problem in editing. Fine you have have your changes iam leaving so your 3 buddies and you can have fun with it. Also remember this point before i leave. The new table is clear, it is well laid out, genres can be removed, overall the table is perfect in all possible ways. I created the table for changes in 2008. --SkyWalker (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

there is no need to use italics. Metzelder Siow (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• So if I am too rude. I am referring to template:TVB series —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metzelder Siow (talk • contribs) 12:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This source is acceptable. See Final Fantasy magic (and its talk page) for a precedent. FightingStreet (talk) 14:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Silver Edge! I see you've made some changes to a number of templates such as Template:Db-g2/doc. I don't understand everything about how these templates work, so I don't know whether your changes are constructive or not. Would you please do me a favour and explain the reasons for your changes at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Suggested new wordings for CSD templates? Thanks! --Coppertwig (talk) 20:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mario Kart Wii. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —Locke Cole • t • c 21:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I do not see evidence that Silver Edge is in an edit war. People keep adding information that has no source given. Anyone has a right to remove such content. Also, for it to be a revert war, Silver Edge would have to be reverting the same person over and over, which he is not. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 20:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need for speed under ground 2.

Edit war.

In the space of Just 5 Minutes you made a LOT of edits.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.141.163 (talk • contribs)

Well there's a difference though, I'm trying to improve the Need for Speed: Underground 2 article with my numerous edits, while your numerous edits violate WP:GAMECRUFT and WP:GAMEGUIDE. [1] You're also on the verge of violating the WP:3RR. --Silver Edge (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, editing an article numerous times in a short period of time, especially when I was copy editing it to conform to guidelines, is not what you call an "edit war". However, the numerous edits you made to the Need for Speed: Underground 2 article (such as spamming and blanking) that were all reverted by myself and four other users, which in turn you went and violated the WP:Three-revert rule by reverting our reverts, is considered editing warring and vandalism. --Silver Edge (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A little question: I wonder whether N-gage Neo article should be deleted. I'm asking since Ngage 2 is redirecting there and it would be better to use it for a redirect to N-Gage 2.0 article. Thanks. IJK_Principle (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on SSBM. Much appreciated. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 08:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In video game releases, some others use the {{flagicon}} tag. {{vgrelease}} may not work, so use {{Flagicon}}. 31Gabe 11:15 16 March 2008

Rather than throw all of these fact tags around, as I notice that they are not used consistently, why not just say that the section itself needs citation? GoldDragon (talk) 03:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Hasn't the game been released in Japan?" yes it has in japan and asia but the "future game" tag is about "article" or "sections" upon a future game, there are not 60 cars in the released version no BBC top gear etc, but it will be available in the PAL/US version hence the tag until march 26 and the PAL issue. Cliché Online (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With all my respect, could you please provide me with more details for your reasons in this subject? from my side I could put forward all my arguments. It could fall into NOR policy (of course, as character reasons could not be cited as 'fact' unless they themselves clearly put it forward), but as it is clear psycholodgical conclusion - I am not sure how much of research is here?

OK, let's try to do it together: if we'll add only that fact that Lunamaria is far less infantile than two other girls Shin tried to protect - will it be acceptable? If we'll qoute, that even returning from being uncoscious on the Moon he still address to Stellar before Luna? If we'll say that Luna's motion to Shinn is still looking quite strange, even with blaming Logos?

And what I would argue in any way with acceptability of referral to NPOV policy here. As you can see - I did not say anything like that Shinn is stubborn, or whatever. (You could not even know my true views on him, Luna, or othe caracters). His idefix on protection is shown quite clear and out of doubts: he justifies _all_ his actions with this word. Well, if it is again the Original Research... isn't it obvious? All I want to add is at least show, that their affection is looking quite strange for many people and tried to help them to understand the reasons. OK, maybe presenting reasons itself is not acceptable as we could not cite it from any other more reliable source.

Can we try to make this subject clear and according to policies together? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gellemar (talk • contribs) 01:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am aiming to improve Nintendo 64 to Featured Article status, and I noticed that you have edited the article substantially recently. If you have time, please help out by contributing to the article. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 06:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on improving Nintendo GameCube to Featured Article status, and noticed that you made a substantial number of contributions to the article recently. If you have time, please help out by improving the article. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently improving Half-Life (video game) to Featured Article status and noticed that you have made substantial contributions to the article recently. If you have time, please help out by improving the article however you can. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 00:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am improving The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass to Featured Article status and noticed that you made substantial changes to the article recently. If you have time, I would be delighted if you could help out with this project. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maxis is dead since they are in EA, since 2007 the Maxis logo was removed from The Sims franchise ! It's no longer Maxis but it's EA Games only. You can try to visit the Maxis official site, it was shutdown and redirected to Spore site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.247.125.69 (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, I have been doing some editing on the Summon Night: Twin Age page. It would appear that you have tagged some of my character descriptions with an unwikipedialike tag for saying they present information which would have been better suited to a game guide. What was your reason for doing this, and how can I fix it?Emma Hordika (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Video games notable for negative reception, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video games notable for negative reception (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Valtoras (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I thought it would be better to have less calls to the same template. Is there somewhere where it says that the dates have to be chronological? MrKIA11 (talk) 14:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I reverted your reverting of me on the PlayStation 3 article, and I wrote an explanation on the talk page. If you want to revert back, I won't outright oppose it, but I do think it's better to use Sony's official numbers. Bye. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sorry about that, I logged in at school and somebody hjacked my account and edited things. I will refrain from such things especially logging in at school. Lil_AzZa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil AzZa (talk • contribs)

I did not change these links, if you'd look at the history of them you'll see that I was the first person to post the information on that page as well as the source, which is reliable. There's proof for each one, so I don't get why you consider it unreliable. I just don't think it's fair that I can come on here, post something original and worthwhile, include a reliable source, and keep having my links changed around. There's no reason for it. If I'm the first person to post it and include a source with proof, that should be enough to make sure that my entry doesn't get changed. Google 'grand theft auto 4 ps3 downloadable content'. What's the first thing to pop up? Type in 'grand theft auto 4 multiplayer ranks' what's the first thing to pop up? I'd appreciate it if you changed everything back to it's original state.Blazedgoldfish69 (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All i was is increasing everness for that article. All i see is just a revert. So when i saw only people do what i have done no one reverts them. Just mine. How unfair. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In general, a video game article should use the official release date and not the in-store date, if two separate dates are announced.

Noticed the term "In general", this means that exceptions do exist. Wii Fit will ONLY be available at the Nintendo World Store in NY, leaving the rest of NA waiting for the 21th. If that's not part of the exception, I don't know what is.

Duhman0009 (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure to also follow the following aspect of the AfD instructions: "it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion. Also consider notifying WikiProjects listed on the discussion page. Do not notify bot accounts or people who have made only insignificant 'minor' edits. To find the main contributors, look in the page history or talk page of the article and/or use TDS' Article Contribution Counter. For your convenience, you may use {{subst:AFDWarningNew|Article title}} ~~~~ (for creators who are totally new users), {{subst:AFDWarning|Article title}} ~~~~ (for creators), or {{subst:Adw|Article title}} ~~~~ (for contributors or established users). You can determine the main contributors of the articles by entering the page name at Wikipedia Page History Statistics." I don't believe you have yet notified the article's creator or main contributors and therefore encourage you to do so. Specifically, you should notify User:Crash Underride. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the COD:4 article, I reverted your recent changes. You are citing things in the MOS that do not exist, in order to move PS3 to the front. That separates the order of the list from Console Console, PC to Console, PC, Console, something that does not make much sense. As well, you changed steam to download, which is not accurate, since steam is not only a download platform but a content playing platform, and is one of the few exclusive downloadable content sites for COD:4. Also, you added a failed verification tag to something that was verified. This article is a featured article, meaning its some of the best content on Wikipedia. As such, you should not make significant changes like that without discussion first on the talk page. Thanks. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 17:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how I looked at that section for like 5 minutes and didn't see those two sentences. Anyway, you're absolutely right. Sorry about the hassle. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 17:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sory, i made an edit in the wrong window - i hope you can forgive me.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amckern (talk • contribs) 09:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, don't worry about it. --Silver Edge (talk) 02:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I happened upon the above mentioned article and noticed the 'non-free' tag that I think you added and proceeded to edit the page to make the tag unnecessary but a user named Gaunt tells me that the images are free to use. Do you have any input on this? I'm not too clear on if these images are in fact free, but my edits at least made it acceptable. If you reply here can you let me know on my talk page? Or you can reply on the talk page for the Space Invaders Extreme article. Thanks. --Thaddius (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you reverted the legacy and reception over at TFC. As much as it was all unsourced and probably opinion, I'm wondering if it'd be better off having all that blurb back on, not so much to "have something on there", but to at least have some basis for proper expansion at a later date. Thoughts? Chan Yin Keen | ^UserTalk _Contribs 08:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not undo my contribution of a score for each console. The score I have given is calculated using a formula based on the number of units sold divided by how many years ago it was released. The scores that I've given is unbiased and fair due to the fact that it is based entirely on empirical data. Hazzard77 (talk) 13:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do keep reverting my edits on the name-dropping page? --58.178.131.160 (talk) 01:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are considered vandalism, as you are "name-dropping" in the Name-dropping article, which isn't the first time. --Silver Edge (talk) 04:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They're not vandalism. --211.27.105.35 (talk) 05:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it is not vandalism, then what is it? --Silver Edge (talk) 05:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno. --211.27.105.35 (talk) 05:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These names with redlinks are not vandalism. --58.178.170.156 (talk) 03:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, these aren't vandalism. --116.240.141.159 (talk) 10:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You left a message on my userpage about adding inappropriate external links, these links are perfectly appropriate and are on the correct pages. I recently cleaned up [[2]] and was adding links to each system. incog (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing in WP:VG/EL that makes these links inappropriate. Many articles have emulators linked in their external links. incog (talk) 04:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway!  :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:17, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove those two videogames? [3] I restored them since, well, they are videogames, and they have sonic as main character. Should we list all videogames there or should we wikilink to Sonic the Hedgehog series instead? --Enric Naval (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then, linking to the Sonic the Hedgehog series article would be ok with you? (since it has sonic the hedgehog on the title) by the way, I'm going away from the computer now, so I won't be able to answer for at least a few hours --Enric Naval (talk) 08:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you are right, it's the first entry on the list. My bad. --Enric Naval (talk) 09:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, I think the zero should go back in. 49.1 implies that the true number is anywhere from 49.05 to 49.15 before rounding, while 49.10 implies a narrower range of 49.095–49.105. The source has the precision to support the latter, and it matches precision with the 23.35 and 61.91 taken from the same source. BTW, good catch on the US/Americas issue. Anomie⚔ 11:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Didn't realise the reliable source article was an essay and not policy - I just copy & pasted the link, so I missed the notice at the top of the article. My bad! Fin©™ 23:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Silver Edge

I can understand the contentious refs, but why the expand section? The PC version has got no representation in the critical reception section! Discussion added Talk:Iron_Man_(video_game).

Cheers

Brownb2 (talk) 00:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is there a discussion of deletion of Category:Video games reviewed by the Angry Video Game Nerd? --Orange Mike | Talk 02:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After numerous references, and actually a simple search conducted on my own also. The information that you seem to want to censor out is legit. I'd recommend performing a little research on your own, before capriciously censoring out information which is relevant and verifiable. There are other citations on that very same page which are from sites that could be considered blogs or forums in nature, yet you seem to have no problem with leaving that information in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.105.95.134 (talk) 03:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Verifiability states:

“

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed.

”

The burden of evidence is on you to provide a reliable source. If there are other unreliable sources being used in that article, tag them with {{vc}}. --Silver Edge (talk) 05:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi! I'm following the same concept on PS2, PS3 and PSN articles, but note the PSX is the name itself and not a abreviation or rumored prototype name. BTW I put a tag "PSX" redirects here. For other uses, see PSX (disambiguation)". Other examples: MTV, JVC. --Ciao 90 (talk) 11:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Sorry, but sadly I cant move PSX (DVR) -> PSX a error appears. Can you please move this correctly? --Ciao 90 (talk) 00:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Disussion copied from User talk:Anthony Appleyard#PSX:- Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • • Sorry about wrong moves, I really confusing and I ask your help. The "PSX" article shoud be the main article and "PSX (disambiguation)" the content you reverted. The PSX (DVR) should be reverted or redirect to PSX. I made an statement here about this, I'm just following other articles conventions, PS2 (Video game console) as a name don't make sense and the name of the device is "PSX" only. I ask your help for properly moves. --Ciao 90 (talk) 01:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• I have reverted the recent attempt by User:Ciao 90 to make this move by cut-and-paste. I realise that there are two opinions on this matter, but if you want to treat PSX (DVR) as the dominant meaning of PSX (a set of 3 initials which has several other meanings), then please suggest it in Wikipedia:Requested moves#Incomplete and contested proposals. I know that the makers of this videogame console tradenamed it "PSX", and not "PSX (Video game console)" or similar, but when the same name or set of initials means more than one thing, need to append a disambiguator in round brackets arises. Wikipedia has dozens of thousands of article names with bracketed disambiguators appended to the item described's correct name. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SilverEdge not disagree with the move, he just reverted the copy and paste. --Ciao 90 (talk) 11:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on editing the Athena Chu article. Regarding your deletion of a few sentences plagiarized from http://www.lovehkfilm.com/people/chu_athena.htm , are you sure that that information was stolen from the external site and not vice versa? A lot of websites copy text from Wikipedia articles for their descriptions, and there have been times in the past that I frantically removed information from an article thinking it was plagiarized from somewhere, only to realize later that it was actually the other way around. I checked the article history, and this version of the article has the text in the exact same form as what's on the lovehkfilm.com link, which implies that the external link could have taken text from a version back then and the Wikipedia article has since changed (which would explain the slight difference between the external version and this article); I checked the page source for the lovehkfilm.com page and couldn't find any hints about the date that was written, but I did see that it was most recently modified in March, which is also the date of the earlier version of the WP article I linked to above. I personally don't know anything about lovehkfilm.com or how they write their articles, I'm just checking. —Politizer^{( talk • contribs )} 22:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I think you're right; I hadn't even noticed that bit at the end. The plagiarized was first added in August 2006 (this edit), so it was definitely on lovehkfilm.com first. I also just noticed in the article history that it was actually tagged for speedy deletion in December 2006 for copyright violation (this edit)...apparently someone removed all the plagiarized content, got the speedy removed, and then put it back in. Anyway, thanks for noticing that and taking the time to correct it!

Also, in the meantime, I have somewhat rewritten the bio section, mostly using the information from the lovehkfilms.com article (it just happens to be the only thing I've really ever read on Athena Chu) but not stealing their wording. Since now we know that it was on that website first, that means I can actually cite them...it's obviously not the best source around but for now it should be better than nothing.

Thanks again for your help and good observations! —Politizer^{( talk • contribs )} 23:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Silver Edge! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your excellent edits on Xbox and Xbox 360-related articles. We need your help at the Wikiproject Xbox. There is much work to do, so please head over to the project page and help us enhance and increase the coverage of Xbox related articles on Wikipedia!

--BlackWatch21 00:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to remove the Tribes101.com external link on the Starsiege:Tribes article, please provide your reasons before doing so. It is not linkspam nor disallowed in the video game external link guidelines.

It is an ever-growing article and video tutorial resource, about many aspects of the game such as strategy, gameplay and technical customizations. It also contains material about the game that is not displayed on any of the remaining linked sites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daftie (talk • contribs) 00:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Way to warn me and then proceed to ban me without me doing anything in between. You have literally ruined the Starsiege:Tribes article by removing essential information. Of course the article doesn't have any sources to cite, all the websites for it are long gone, but the article contained information that is verifiable in the game's printed Manual, which you obviously never owned.

If you knew anything about the game, you'd leave be the information that is common knowledge so that one day, someone might benefit from it, but no, you just seem to be an edit & ban abuser. I'd be calling your "contributions" into question if it weren't that I think I'd rather not waste my life. It's people like you who should not have any pull in Wikipedia, but unfortunately do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daftie (talk • contribs) 11:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted you to know that I appreciate your cleanup after User:Ianbell330. I was just about to go after him, but you already took good care :) Rror (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see how it works. Many thanks. AL. Americanlinguist (talk) 17:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't see how this qualifies for a speedy rename. Can you enlighten me? - Stepheng3 (talk) 06:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I changed Dos to DOs is because of the pronunciation. Dos would be pronounced as ms-dos, and DOs would be pronounced correctly. Perhaps I should change it to Do's? -- IRP ☎ 21:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, can I ask a favour of you? You're always good with finding sales information, and I've got a little challenge for you. Can you find any sales information for Sam & Max Hit the Road? Its an old game, and I've turned up absolutely nothing in my searches. Since you seem to know where to look, you may have better luck. -- Sabre (talk) 12:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darn. Guess that as the game predates the rise of the Internet, the net doesn't have extensive information on that sort of stuff for it. Well, thanks for looking anyway. -- Sabre (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. you have been involved in editing the article List of best selling video games and have reverted some of this user's edits. an RfC has been opened at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Pé_de_Chinelo. if you feel you agree or wish to discuss, please drop by. thanks chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 11:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove content like you did to Final Fantasy VII. It's considered vandalism. The Prince (talk) 16:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And BTW, why didn't you remove the content in the lead as well. Is that just you being lazy? The Prince (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it based on WP:SYN. There are no sources provided that indicates that Final Fantasy VII is the "the highest-selling Final Fantasy title" and that Gran Turismo is only PlayStation game that has shipped more copies than Final Fantasy VII. --Silver Edge (talk) 16:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware that it was also in the lead. --Silver Edge (talk) 16:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, but it took me no more than a couple of seconds to find a source. Why couldn't you do it instead of removing the content? The Prince (talk) 16:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling video games was the source for Gran Turismo being the only PlayStation game that has shipped more copies than FF VII, so I assumed the "highest-selling Final Fantasy title" statement was also using that article as a source. My bad. --Silver Edge (talk) 17:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. The Prince (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is sdhc compatibility not relevant to the discussion? The DSi does have an sd slot. 206.255.198.78 (talk) 23:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming you misread the history of Talk:Nintendo DSi. I removed a section named "Incompatible with previous DS and DS Lite Carts?" with the "Removed section, as per WP:Talk page guidelines: "Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal." See WP:NOTFORUM" edit summary on November 27, 2008. That edit summary from that November 27 edit is not related to the section you created on December 4, 2008, which as of this writing is currently still there (Talk:Nintendo DSi#SDHC compatibility). So I'm assuming you misunderstood this and thought I had removed the section you created. --Silver Edge (talk) 05:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is meant to help if the article changes names. 2007 in video games is not likely gonna ever change. TJ Spyke 16:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now, here's how to add. 118.69

                        81.36
                       ------
                       200.05

You see how they line up, you take your fingers, count on them, and you get: 200.05. I know you're obviously slow, so I'll take my time. Yooouuuu ttttaaaakkkkkeeee theeeee numberssssss, aaaaaaand coooouuuuuunnnntttt them- 200.05 IS GREATER than 200! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.163.45.241 (talk) 21:39, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you need to learn to be civil. Second of all, this source does not explicitly state that over 200 million units have been sold in the Game Boy line, you just went and added the Game Boy and Game Boy Advance figures together, which violates the WP:No original research policy. --Silver Edge (talk) 06:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Being the third best selling game for the SNES is sourced to IGN - long considered a reliable source for video game information and used in many good and featured articles about video games ([4]). The source you are adding appears to comprise of two links with no information about the game one of which is blocked from viewing. On this basis I have reverted your change. Guest9999 (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After viewing the IGN article again, I now notice the "Fun Facts" section to the right of the article, which mentions the number of copies sold and its ranking, my bad. --Silver Edge (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, easy to miss. Guest9999 (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of InuYasha locations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of InuYasha locations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for the info, Silver Edge.

By the way, have you ever considered archiving your talk page?
~~LDEJRuff~~ ^{(see what I've contributed)} 13:28, 25 January 2009 (EDT)

Would you like to join the Koei Warriors Games WikiProject? It is everything Dynasty Warriors, Samurai Warriors, Warriors Orochi, and Dynasty Warriors Games! To participate, add your name to the list of participants and apply {{User WPKoeiWarriors}} to your user page.

If you are not sure what a WikiProject is, it is a club of Wikipedians interested in the WikiProject's subject and helping to improve articles of or related to that subject. I saw you greatly contributed to the Samurai Warriors article, so I figured I'd ask if you wanted to participate in Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Koei Warriors Games. You do not have to, and neither are you obligated; I am just asking. -BlueCaper (talk) 21:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tylerwade123, a user who has been blocked multiple times is repeatedly adding original research and personal opinions to the Lunamaria Hawke article. He is also misrepresenting a source that says this character came in 4th in a fan poll for which Gundam Seed character people would most like to see in a swimsuit, using wording that makes it sound like they came in 4th in a poll of all Gundam characters. He also keeps deleting a cite to the official website and replacing it with a link to the Anime New Network. Please take a look at the article and see. Edward321 (talk) 05:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An new user has boldly reworked List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED characters. I was probably too wordy in comments on the editor's talk page, but I thought the previous organization (by faction) would be easier to source, while the current organization would be much harder to source. Either way, please comment about the changes and which version you feel is better. Edward321 (talk) 04:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor using 2 different IPs has been repeatedly editing Athrun Zala, adding claims that director Fukuda has made certain statements about the character, but their only source is a couple Youtube videos. So far they've added this 6 times, but don't seem to be understanding the concept or reliable sources. Edward321 (talk) 04:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a proposal to merge the Gundam Seed and Gundam Seed Destiny articles. If you have an opinion, feel free to voice it in the discussion. [5] [6] Edward321 (talk) 14:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FX-550+AQME-X01 Aile Grasper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FX-550+AQME-X02 Sword Grasper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FX-550+AQME-X03 Launcher Grasper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of video games in development. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video games in development. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Drake class escort ship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 20:58, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Drake class (refit).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 21:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wii Series. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii Series. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is ZAPX. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZAPX. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Ulen Hibiki, Siegel Clyne. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulen Hibiki for Ulen Hibiki, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siegel Clyne (2nd nomination) for Siegel Clyne. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cosmic Era Mobile Units, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a redirect to a page deleted as a result of an AFD discussion.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Anthem of joy (talk) 20:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED vehicles and aircraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED vehicles and aircraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem 11:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED vehicles and aircraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED vehicles and aircraft(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jfgslo (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Nintendo DSi know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 5, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at present, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 5, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Nintendo DSi is a dual-screen handheld game console released by Nintendo. It is the third iteration of the Nintendo DS, and its primary market rival is Sony's PlayStation Portable. Development of the DSi began in late 2006, and the handheld was first unveiled during a 2008 Nintendo conference in Tokyo. While the DSi's design is similar to that of the DS Lite, it features two digital cameras and also connects to an online store called the Nintendo DSi Shop. The DSi is approximately 12% shorter than the DS Lite when closed, but it is slightly wider and lighter. The DSi also has a larger RAM and faster CPU. All DS games are compatible with the DSi, except those that require the Game Boy Advance slot. Because of its absence, the DSi is not backward compatible with GBA Game Paks or with accessories that require the GBA slot, such as the DS Rumble Pak and the Guitar Hero: On Tour series guitar grip. The Nintendo DSi received generally positive reviews. Critics praised many of the console's changes to the DS Lite's aesthetics and functionality, but complained that it launched with insufficient exclusive software. A larger version of the DSi, the Nintendo DSi XL, was released in 2009. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2006 in video gaming by month links has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soetermans. T / C 14:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]