User talk:Nixeagle

nixeagle is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia after sunday as I am having surgery for a second CI on thursday, will be unable to respond to *any* messages

If you are here to report a problem with a bot that I operate, please contact me vie the email user function! I will get the message and be able to respond to it much faster then a post to this page. You can consider leaving a message here saying you sent an email, but please send an email. —— nixeagle

Archives
old stuff  •  March 2006  •  April 2006  •  May 2006  •  June 2006  •  July 2006  •  August 2006  •  September 2006  •  October 2006  •  November 2006  •  December 2006  •  January 2007  •  Febuary 2007  •  March 2007  •  April 2007  •  May 2007  •  June 2007  •  July 2007  •  August 2007  •  September 2007  •  October 2007  •  November 2007

Crappon (talk · contribs) is saying he's not a sock and requesting another look at the Checkuser evidence. Daniel Case (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please find another more active person. At the moment my activity there is limited to maintaining the SPI bot. Thanks. —— nixeagle^{email me} 15:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Anyone know what ever happened to User:3RRBot?". His absence has been noted at WP:AN, in a thread discussing the lack of enough 3RR closers. I used to have the bot reports on my own watchlist, but haven't seen any for a while. EdJohnston (talk) 03:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll bring it back up tomorrow, it needs a few cleanups to its algorithm. I've been having issues off wiki and have been distracted. —— nixeagle^{email me} 15:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nixeagle,

Good to see you editing again. Are you maintaining DYKadminBot? If you are, there are a few improvements that could be made. Let me know when you're ready for the list. Shubinator (talk) 06:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nix, take a look at my talkpage history. I think we'd discussed this before, but is there a way to have the clerkbot stop leaving clerks messages about codeletters? Or at least, have the bot only notify the actual report creator for the letters? Thanks, Nathan ^T 21:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you might want to re-register it to prevent hijacking. β^_command 21:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In this edit to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mattijsmattijs, the investigation was archived by SPCUClerkbot, but there's no link from there to the archive. Is this a bug in the bot, or was the page wrongly tagged for archiving? Thanks, MuffledThud (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of the people who has made 2009 such an interesting and enlightening year for me. It has certainly had its challenges, but also many highlights. I wish you peace and contentment in 2010, and a joyous holiday season to you and yours. In honour of the season, I hope you will enjoy a little musical token. Your choice: traditional or cheeky. Best, Risker (talk) 04:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twice in the past week, I've used the autoblock finder on particular accounts that were either not blocked, or recently unblocked, and found nothing. I was only able to find the autoblock by searching by the name of the alternate account that triggered the autoblock. Is this normal behaviour? –xeno^talk 17:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nixeagle hasn't edited since November; I don't think anyone knows why. Nathan ^T 17:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why he's away? or why the autoblock isn't work? –xeno^talk 17:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why he's away. Unless something changed in the last few weeks. Nathan ^T 03:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A request for comment has begun on the subject of Wikipedia:IRC/wikipedia-en-help founder proposal.

This notification was sent to all users listed in the IRC channel as an operator or above, and group contacts.  Chzz  ►  01:26, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. WOSlinker (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bill william compton^Talk 05:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You previously deleted an article on Robert Dodds. I am writing an article about Robert Dodds, the notably decorated World War I flying ace, who later was a civil aviation pioneer in Canada. I am checking with you about your prior deletion; did you delete that Robert Dodds, or was it some other?

Georgejdorner (talk) 15:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Nixeagle isn't editing anymore since Nixeagle hasn't done an edit since 2009. Nixeagle did delete the article. I looked at what was deleted. The article was very short and it was about a "Talented listed New England artist/watercolorist". It looked like a resume so its deletion was appropriate. I see no problems with writing an article on the pilot. This is a solid reference (if it's the same person) that I urge for you to use and discuss in the article. Royalbroil 05:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nixeagle was doing some important editing and corrections on articles relating to mountains and volcanoes around the world! Apparently complications with personal surgery results terminated that activity. Who is continuing and or compiling that work now? Please respond online. Jimmie. James, USA

64.22.15.199 (talk) 03:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I've been dealing with other issues in life and other projects I've picked up. —— nixeagle^{email me} 16:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EagleBotResize has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 05:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikify-talk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 10:47, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the article.

User:USER-cacophony/myg0t/s, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:USER-cacophony/myg0t/s and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:USER-cacophony/myg0t/s during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 16:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikiVoter Beta 0.4.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DannyS712 (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Test/Sub/Archive, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 00:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Helpme-onTalk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DB1729^talk 00:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]