User talk:Prasenjitmouri

The article SearchLock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an important or widely covered browser extension. The extension is also misrepresented in the article: it's also an ad-serving platform, thus Google only brings up "how to remove SearchLock virus" results. Unlikely to be malicious but it's worth saving this article until the product is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wieldthespade (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SearchLock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SearchLock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wieldthespade (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you recently added a Bloomberg reference to the SearchLock article, but there is no link or other identifying information. I've searched Bloomberg and affiliated websites and cannot find a single mention of SearchLock. Can you give more information about this reference so that we can make it easy to find? An issue number, or publication date, or anything would help. Thank you. Wieldthespade (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm trying to understand why you added italic titles to seemingly random articles such as LAHS and Balloon fiesta. That template is meant for cases like books where the title of the article ought to be in italics. Agtx (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account is blocked as a sock further to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Accounts, based on both technical (CheckUser) and behavioural/editing pattern evidence. It is performed by a bot authorized to block accounts for this specific sockpuppetry investigation. This is a CheckUser block. Please refer any unblock request to the CheckUser team, either at Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations or through the Functionaries-en mailing list. EgressBot (talk) 23:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]