User talk:Lisha2037

Ritu Khullar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 22:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Devlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Liance^talk 01:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kathleen Roussel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 21:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ritu Khullar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ritu Khullar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ritu Khullar and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ritu Khullar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ritu Khullar for comments about the article, and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lisha, I saw you renominated -- I'm going to remove your renomination but just for a half an hour or an hour then it'll go back up. It's to avoid confusing the bot that maintains the GA pages -- Reidgreg is going to put in the fail and I don't want the bot to get confused about there being two simultaneous nominations. Don't worry about the nomination apparently disappearing -- it'll come right back. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok wasn’t sure what was happening as the other editor won’t be able to pick it up unless there’s a nomination. Lisha2037 (talk) 21:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There will be another nomination -- shouldn't be long as Reidgreg said they're working on the text of the fail they'll post. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now renominated. It should show up in the GA nominations page in about twenty minutes. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien I think it’s now ready. Lisha2037 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Susanne Craig you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Also, If there’s a certain editing style you prefer let me know. I definitely want this article to be made green! :) Lisha2037 (talk) 01:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Lisha2037, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have a dynamic Canadian journalist interested in improving our coverage of women. Given your GA success with Ritu Khullar and your nomination of Susanne Craig, not to mention all the improvements you have made to several other biographies of women, it certainly looks as if you will be a useful member of the project. I realize you are already a highly competent editor but when writing about women you might find it useful to look through our Primer. You might also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interest in the project. As you have been working on improving articles up to GA, you might like to take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Susanne Craig you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Susanne Craig and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Susanne Craig you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Susanne Craig for comments about the article, and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323 Online events: New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost Asian content on Wikipedia each November. Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at search.creativecommons.org/ Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]