User talk:Komitsuki

Welcome!

Hello, Komitsuki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Koryo-saram. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! cab (talk) 10:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Komitsuki. I did get your message, but I only had time to put the CSD tag on before I left the house. I was planning to write back once I got home. As for your request, if it's simply a mistitled article, you don't need to delete it as such: if you are an autoconfirmed user, you can move it yourself, or you can just ask someone to move it for you. Moving is better than recreating the page, because it keeps the talk page and history intact.

If you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to write back here or at my talk page. Regards Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mana Ogawa has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you stop reverting. The problem is you did not understand the notability policy. The ball did not receive the wide attention from media, especially only people from Japan response to it, unlike Adidas Jabulani during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Your reason to revert also sounds like you are combative about people removing your edits are "wrong" while it is meaningless. It is not like "doesn't matter, i want it to include" --Aleenf1 11:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really? A controversy is still a controversy. You can't deny that. Komitsuki (talk) 11:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just read WP:NTEMP, Wikipedia is not a news reports. "Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage". So please STOP! --Aleenf1 11:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I stop? I didn't insult you, Wikipedia nor anything. This is a controversy in two countries. Not one but two. So I think this was noticeable. You don't need an English-language sources to make it noticeable. Komitsuki (talk) 11:53, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you understand what I'm talking about? Please see Wikipedia:Notability (events). It is not based on thinking. Did you understand the guidelines? --Aleenf1 11:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the guidelines. I just don't understand your interpretation of these guidelines. I think this was a noticeable controversy that was related by two independent parties (SK and Japan). The Korean article refuted the Japanese claims. Komitsuki (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Jabulani receive many response from footballer around the world, depth coverage, effects. For this, it is not receive much response from many teams, the significant are so tiny and WP is not a news coverage. --Aleenf1 12:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about this. I added an extra sentence from the Japanese article to clarify this. Japanese soccer player Kota Mizunuma made a questionable remark "whether this ball is heavy or light". Is there any alternative? Komitsuki (talk) 12:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can move to Football at the 2010 Asian Games, new headings "Official ball" no need to player article. Just need the criteria:

1. Official ball name
2. Who make it
3. Critical response
4. Opposite party deny?

That is enough. Thank you. --Aleenf1 12:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did it in a slightly different approach but as long you and I agree that I deleted my edit in that 2010 Asian Games article, everything's okay, right? Komitsuki (talk) 12:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough. --Aleenf1 00:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You made an edit to the article which I think you put in the wrong place [1]. if you think it needs to be there could you check the sentence location and ensure it goes to the proper place.--Crossmr (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well the problem is you wrote it like it belongs in a different spot, I'm just not sure what spot. You wrote "despite this". The question is "despite what?" You placed that text after the fact that there were 6000 hagwons in gangnam. I think you were trying to reference the curfew of 22:00 which comes later in the paragraph.--Crossmr (talk) 10:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree, for now, with your recent removal of a large part of the text in support of the project, your reasoning that the "Korean version of the page debunked it" and suggesting that I "...should know more about South Korea" is incorrect. The now removed text is in fact a copyright violation of this page from APEC so I have not re-added it for that reason alone. In fact I should have checked for this first, before reverting your earlier edit. Specific knowledge of South Korea is helpful but is not required to edit the article in question. You know nothing about me and to make the assumption that I should know more about South Korea before editing is not assuming good faith.

Please read Wikipedia's five pillars, particularly the part that says that Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view and about using reliable sources; and note that Wikipedia, whether the English or Korean version, is not a reliable source. Saying the Korean page debunked the source is not a reason to remove the text from the English version. A better approach might have been to add to the article saying that these views have been debunked by whoever and citing the same source the Korean version of the article used. Astronaut (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I will continue to support your addition of properly referenced criticisms of this project, your continued removal of any wording that shows this project in a good light has got to stop. Such political soapboxing is not helpful to the aims of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and undoing large amounts of other people's contributions is disruptive. In particular, your "recovering" session (one that could have been achieved in a single edit, incidentally) blindly removed User:Osfinsua's desperately need cleanup of the language used in the article, much of which had been only roughly translated from the original Korean. Astronaut (talk) 09:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You made change to Template:Numeral systems: your change.
Please read this and think twice where exactly the link to unary numeral system should be placed. --StanContributor (talk) 22:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In BBK stock price manipulation incident, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Special counsel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lee Sang-don (1951) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 22:40, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Semitic languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ergative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Prouna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 11:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Yukie Sato requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cloudz679 20:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Note to self: Bring this back soon) Komitsuki (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MOFAT Diamond Scandal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOFAT Diamond Scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jab843 (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Park Won-soon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kang Yong-suk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jung-gu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Komitsuki, please consider this as a friendly warning NOT to manipulate Korean-reference articles, taking opinion and write them as fact, etc etc. Anything that is void of personal opinion further increases your credibility. ShinVeritas (talk) 02:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your political bias (Korean-Americans often support the Korean "neo-con" right) doesn't help you, too. Komitsuki (talk) 02:29, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, a lot of Korean Americans don't really hang out with Korea-Koreans, much less talk about Korean politics. ShinVeritas (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a weird case because I'm a minority in this country compare to the apolitical majority. A mixed Chinese-Filipino and a Korean-American heritage. Komitsuki (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting why the interest in the country weakest amd Furthestest away? Korea I mean ShinVeritas (talk) 02:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dad was from Malaysia. Mom was from the USA. I don't think of myself as a patriotic Filipino although I respect the country. And second of all, my activity surrounding my church. It's Korea-funded Roman Catholic. Komitsuki (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Caffè Pascucci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

-- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 11:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Komitsuki, I haven't been following the Macquarie stuff too well but I'll definitely keep an eye out on it. As for the strikes, yeah that's pretty controversial stuff, hope it ends well. Doesn't the Philippines still have armed rebel groups in the south? Hope it ends well but that's gotta be not good for human rights, no? ShinVeritas (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Komitsuki, I started a discussion at Talk:South Korean legislative election, 2012. Pleas join the discussion and feel free to comment. Thanks, --- PBJT (talk) 15:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Komitsuki, I responded to your comment at my talk page. Please check the message, and feel free to comment. Thanks, --- PBJT (talk) 00:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Komitsuki, I replied to your comment at my talk page. Thanks, --- PBJT (talk) 08:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	Many thanks for the recent change in your user page, Komitsuki! I really appreciate that you generously authorized my request. I apologize if I had been too critical, and I have absolutely no right to discourage your contribution because of my bias. Thanks again, and wish we can get along with each other. --- PBJT (talk) 14:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Komitsuki, and thanks for your kind reply. Hope you have a good time in Malaysia! Cheers, --PBJT (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nice Girl Project!, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shadow Cabinet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Serjeant-at-Arms may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• at-Arms Parliament of Australia: House of Representatives | title= Parliament of Australia > About Parliament > Serjeant-at-Arms}}</ref> Around 1415, the [[British House of Commons]] received its first Sergeant-
• The [[Knesset]] of [[Israel]] has a sergeant-at-arms (officially known in Hebrew as "קצין הכנסת" ("k'tzin ha-Knesset"), (lit. "Officer of the Knesset",

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+[2], see also recent edits:[3] and[4]. --Qexigator (talk) 10:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Mantey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—History (journal) —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Yashovardhan Dhanania. Komitsuki, thanks for creating Love Destiny (Single Album)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references. See WP:REFB to get started

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Yashovardhan (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Pollock roe—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Gidiyorum (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   22:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Komitsuki, Thanks for adding the IMSLP link to the Louise Tunison article! T. E. Meeks (talk) 11:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tom Kim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heinrich Schecker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dan arndt (talk) 04:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dan arndt (talk) 11:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hunminjeongeum (word processor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FranklinOfNull (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I no longer review new articles. I lost the privilege last year.Vincelord (talk) 19:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danny Russo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]