User talk:Kevlar

Welcome!

Hello, Kevlar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - UtherSRG 22:54, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

Category:Lightweight Mixed Martial Arts fighters, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – VegaDark (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Upcoming mixed martial arts events, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Upcoming mixed martial arts events is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Upcoming mixed martial arts events, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Upcoming mixed martial arts events, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

We already have a category for them.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --aktsu ^(t / c) 06:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Upcoming mixed martial arts events, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 21:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Aggression Fighting Championship events has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of this event's notability, no article about the event itself.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SiMntjMMA (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! the work on the table was done on UFC 147 by Gamezero05 you can see the progression of his work on the following pages. [old ugly fight card], [first change], [second change], [third change], [he got the look down], [first one with notes]. Kevlar (talk) 03:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note on my talk page. Actually, I don't belong to any Projects, not even of those of subjects I'm particularly interested in. But I do a fair bit of disambiguating - I think that is how I've been involved in MMA articles. Anyway, good luck in finding people. StAnselm (talk) 01:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As with StAnselm, I was working on disabiguating pages. I have no particular interest in MMA. Good luck with the project, and hopefully you will get that section of wikipedia looking good. Suprcel (talk) 20:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. You have new messages at Braincricket's talk page.
Message added 06:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Braincricket (talk) 06:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you went through and changed All the David Abbots back to Tank Abbott. I switched them to David because policy on wikipedia has always been to use real names instead of nicknames on results pages. For example, its always seen as Quinton Jackson instead of Quinton "Rampage" Jackson or Rampage Jackson.

Just letting you know, but thanks for your MMA contributions in general. Too many deletionists and not enough people willing to fix the current pages.

Luchuslu (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Undefeated mixed martial artists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Tom B (talk) 10:19, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the invite to the MMA page. I wasnt aware i created any articles based on MMA--Mjs1991 (talk) 11:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, now i'm in. I'll keep expanding and improving the MMA coverage and helping in whatever else i can. Poison Whiskey (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work! Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. You have new messages at My Ubuntu's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Preceding signed comment added by me, My Ubuntu (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite but I don't think I've ever edited a MMA article...? GiantSnowman 15:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am more than happy to work towards a solution to the issue of MMA event notability, but given the current everything must be recorded how the fans want position, I don't know what to recommend. Mtking ^(edits) 08:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. You have new messages at Mtking's talk page.
Message added 09:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mtking ^(edits) 09:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kevlar for the welcome! I will try to lend a hand =) Niklas9999 (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Kevlar, I have been trying to figure out how everything around this project works. I was thinking that I could start by doing mass improvements that don't need a lot of experience. For example there is a lot of difference regarding how results are presented for events. Example if you compare UFC 100 with UFC 152. I was thinking I could go through all UFC events and making them look like UFC 152. I saw a discussion about how results should be presented but I cant find place where it says which standard should be used. Should I use the one from UFC 152?

Btw am I posting in the right place on this talkpage?

Niklas9999 (talk) 00:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At a glance I can tell why the articles are being deleted. and that is because most of the sources are from garbage websites like mmajunkie and bloodyelbow and even ufc.com. Rather than say Chicago-sun times or NY times. Or even a yahoo sports article or regional newspaper would be better than online fan websites like Sherdog. In short all those bad references must be replaced with good ones. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of credibly covering higher level mixed martial arts, MMA Junkie, Bloody Elbow, MMA Mania, MMA Fighting and Sherdog rank far ahead of the brick and mortar newspapers or regional websites. There are dozens of original articles, interviews, videos, technical analysis and editorials produced by those sites PortlandOregon97217 calls "garbage" that are referenced by the fighters, agents, promoters and fans constantly. Each of the above sites is within the top 16,000 sites worldwide. I do write for Bloody Elbow and I'm making that fact known to head off any "secret bias" claims. Yahoo Sports does cover MMA, so do Sports Illustrated and ESPN. However, each of those three have a much smaller staff roster that has the time and space to do a certain amount of news/results articles. Furthermore, I've seen higher standards of fact-checking, sourcing and ethical standards backstage in my time at Bloody Elbow than I ever did at my college's newspaper and some brick and mortar newspapers.(DefGrappler (talk) 06:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I agree with using more printed publications as sources, but MMAJunkie is an original news source and is owned by USA Today (USA Today even portal-links a majority of their MMA articles there if you search USA Today's own website for MMA). Sherdog is also an original news source and a partner of ESPN. They are also the oldest significant MMA website around and have an unbelievably comprehensive and invaluable database of almost every professional fighter who has ever been in the sport, numbering over 100,000 people at this point. BloodyElbow, while mostly a blog site, is owned by Vox Media and regularly conducts original interviews. All three of these sites are generally valid sources of information. I do agree that the sources need to be diversified more to include print sources. I recommend trying to use http://www.newsbank.com/ to look up more print sources for UFC events. Beansy (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, take a look at any number of other articles from sports that aren't one of the 6 or 7 most popular out there and you'll see any number of sport-specific sources, often websites. UFC articles have been actually much better sourced than most articles for second-tier sports as of late from what I can tell. Beansy (talk) 13:58, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind feedback from Help talk:Magic words#Help with magic words in a template. Glad to have helped! — Richardguk (talk) 22:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Guidance Barnstar
		For your efforts on improving WP:MMA info, especially WP:MMA/Sources (Template:MMA find sources), WP:MMA/Biography maintenance and WP:MMA/Participation drive. Keep it up! — Poison Whiskey 21:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoop!! Yeah that looks much better than anything I could come up with. I'm not very savy with this wiki code :( way to go!! PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 08:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. You have new messages at Wikipediatalk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts's talk page.
Message added 18:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hasteur (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your hard work on improving WP:MMA. LlamaAl (talk) 19:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, but I'm not interested in participating in a discussion to change the project guidelines — as others note, there's some terminology that you project members clearly know that I don't, and I don't want to offer opinions based on a misunderstanding of what's meant. Nyttend (talk) 20:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As above. I appreciate the invite but I have no wish to contribute to the MMA portal on Wikipedia in its current form. Aqueously (talk) 22:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the numbers on events aren't correct, DREAM for instances hasn't staged 183 events.--Phospheros (talk) 21:59, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the work you have been putting into the new criteria, I think given the comments by User:Nintendude64 it needs to be made clear one way or the other does a UFC title fight demonstrate lasting effect. I believe they are routine and as such do not demonstrate lasting effect. Without a specific mention of this I foresee scope for continued debate at AfD's. Since you are for the most part the author of them I will leave it up to you to add something. Mtking ^(edits) 10:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wonder if you meant to create the article MMATIER as well as the WP: redirect; I suspect you did not, if not then could you tag it {{db-self}} Mtking ^(edits) 04:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but this morning has been a bit busy, I have been mulling over in my head how to better frame the issue with title fights but not getting very far, for example if a fighter looses a title fight and then quits the sport, that is notable for the fighter and should be covered in the article on the fighter; I am not sure that would necessary follow through to demonstrating that the event it's self had lasting significance in relation to the overall narrative of MMA as a sport, take for example Dan Marino was his first or last game for Miami Dolphins of lasting significance in relation to the NFL or Football ? The problem is somewhat compounded in that there is no such thing as a overall world tittle fight, the fight is for that given promotions title it also seems to me that title fights do not necessary always occur be ween the two top ranked fighters. On the other hand I could see a occasion when for example there is a huge upset (or for that matter a huge disparage between fighters) in a title fight which for example leads to an outcry from fans and forces a change in the way contenders are chosen by the promoter that could show a lasting significance. Mtking ^(edits) 23:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i could not agree more. my main problem was that in my v3.1 it almost read like "title fights can not make an event notable", i want to find a good way of saying: a title match doesn't really matter to notability, some are, some aren't. some non title matches have more long term lasting effect than some title matches. an event could begin with the worst card of fighters, and have no title match, but something in it could 'change the sport forever'. but then people think i'm trying to set the bar too high by saying "only the most notable events in the history of MMA should have their own articles" instead of events that adequately demonstrate lasting effect, should have their own articles." i believe within lasting effect there is a spectrum of how notable something was. if there were 20 events, arranged from 1 having displayed the highest degree of lasting effect, 10 having the least degree of lasting effect (but still demonstrating lasting effect), and 11 - 20 not having demonstrated lasting effect but 11 being closer than 20. just because 10 wasn't as notable as 1 doesn't mean it doesn't get it's own article. and just because 11 may have a lot of the same characteristics of 1 - 10, doesn't mean that it does, it couldn't on it's own display lasting effect.Kevlar (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It may be the case of accepting this and then fine tuning later as it becomes clear how firstly members of WP:MMA use it and secondly how the rest of the community reacts to that use in practice.

I could/would have supported that version but I have made a few minor changes, nothing is intended to change your overall thrust, if you feel that it has then feel free to ignore. I also tried to find a way of expressing something along the lines of "when demonstrating lasting significance if would be very helpful to show coverage of the lasting effect continued after the event (as per WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)" but nothing I worded was concise enough and ended up putting two much emphasis on that one point over the others so gave up. If you can then add it good, otherwise I am fine with either yours or mine. Mtking ^(edits) 01:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. You have new messages at Mtking's talk page.
Message added 02:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mtking ^(edits) 02:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why create an omnibus separating the free events by type. Like UFC on Fox, UFC on FX, UFC on FUEL TV, and so on. And for PPV numbers we also have UFC 1-10, UFC 10-20 and so on in incrimants of 10? We can also made an omnibus page for the TUF Finales. But they must be AS detailed as the stand alone articles. And very notable events like UFC 94 and UFC 148 must have their own page. Also needs to be updated and have NO spelling or grammatical errors. Can this be an idea to stop the madness over MMA on wikipedia? JonnyBonesJones (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following your comment here, thanks for giving it ago, but it seams that to get consensus at WP:MMA any guideline would need in essence allow for an article on every UFC event however any such "free pass" will not be acceptable wiki-wide. Mtking ^(edits) 22:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i think some people can see that omnibus pages aren't by nature terrible. the trick is to show people that. i decided to do some testing on User:Kevlar/2011 in UFC, took me -forever- to properly steal and modify that "Event Chronology" table. i'm then going to add what the current stand alone pages look like, probably organized by type (ppv, ufc on fox, TUF...) i'm then going to work on a list of "UFC rookies" and "last fight in the UFC" lists. i think with some work people will want omnibus articles because they can offer extra content and context. i hope with just my ideas as the example, they can see that other people will probably have even better ideas than me, and realize that omnibus does not equal end of world. Kevlar (talk) 23:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is wanted herePortlandOregon97217 (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A while back you added a lot of scroll boxes in reflists. This is not allowed in article space, you can see the reason in Template:Scroll box. Can you help undo those edits if I miss any? Ryan Vesey 22:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can use this file.--Aguzer|communication^E-M 22:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kevlar. There has been discussion among some of us about modifying and implementing the MMAevent templates that you created. It's a bit scattered around between a couple different places. I wanted to get your feedback on a question I left on my talk page here about the three templates and their uses. If you have any responses or suggestions on the other stuff in that section feel free to add it in. Thanks. --TreyGeek (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just noticed that the section you created WT:MMA#Omnibus discussion is essentially the same thing found in the 201X section right above it. I thought about moving your post and my reply up but didn't want to do so without asking you first. If you think they're enough the same, would you mind consolidating them so the discussion is in one place? Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 10th Legion Championship Fighting events is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 10th Legion Championship Fighting events until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thank for the invitation to MMA project. One of my favorite subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palacesblowlittle (talk • contribs) 21:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of Pancrase Events, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sherdog.com/organizations/Pancrase-19.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 21:59, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Dr. Kadzi. Kevlar, thanks for creating 1993 in UFC!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page is an orphan, consider linking it to other pages.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kadzi (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zaza Tkeshelashvili may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |{[[Renato Sobral]]
• |{[[Ricardo Morais]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BracketBot, you're a rockin' little WP:ROBOT Kevlar (talk) 21:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Lewis (fighter) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | [[Wilmington, North Carolina]]], United States

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sergei Gur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrei Semenov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pride 12, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Marsh and Mark Kerr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to UFC 26 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{MMAevent bout

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, no problem.リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 00:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. You have new messages at Bamyers99's talk page.
Message added 17:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 in UFC may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Scheduled sports

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 04:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're adding articles. That's great. But, you're supposed to have punctuation, then a reference. for example, a reference goes after a period, not before. So, it's something like this: Billy Unger is an actor who plays Chase Davenport in Lab Rats.<ref>[reference]</ref>, not Billy Unger is an actor who plays Chase Davenport in Lab Rats<ref>[reference]</ref>.. -- EvilLair (talk to me!) 05:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for pointing this out. I noticed that you fixed a bunch of them, i fixed the rest. Kevlar (talk) 07:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Felix Mitchell (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:TWODABS, hatnote better for pages like this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tank Abbott may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | [Sam Adkins (fighter)|Sam Adkins]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:59, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ameran Bitsadze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 04:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that all the MMA biographical articles you created have the wrong/same name in the Project tags. Copy/Paste issue that can cause problems.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic. Thanks for clearing that up.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hiroaki Yoshioka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroyuki Abe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop mentioning Holland as either a place of birth or as a location, as if it still exists today. It doesn't. The name of the country is the Netherlands, and two of its twelve provinces are North Holland and South Holland. All three have their respective articles that you can link to. If you must mention a province, make sure to mention the right one. Fnorp (talk) 08:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2006 in UFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Herman (fighter). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, can you do me a favor and lowercase all of the results (the way they won --- for instance, change a "Decision (Unanimous)" to "Decision (unanimous)") of the respective mixed martial artists' pages you had recently created (I believe they were all created sometime in October of 2014)? --Bl1tzkrieg1940 (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2007 in UFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Miles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow member! WikiProject X needs your help!

We studied the various needs that WikiProjects have, and have come up with some ideas for our first round of WikiProject tool development. These include:

• An automatically updated WikiProject directory that surfaces WikiProject-related metrics and automatically generates a list of active participants and potential members;
• A lightweight, optional alternative to WikiProject banners, featuring an option to quickly send a message to the named WikiProjects;
• A tool that bootstraps WikiProjects; and
• A worklist generation script for WikiProjects

We are now looking for volunteer coders to work on these projects. If you are interested in developing these tools, or if you would to volunteer for other tasks, check out our new volunteers portal. Thank you for your help!

Cheers, Harej (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Button (Reddit) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This does not need its own page. There is already a subsection on the reddit Wikipedia page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk) 05:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Valdas Pocevicius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plunge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2008 in Shark Fights, Kevlar!

Wikipedia editor Roches just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I reviewed this and two other MMA season articles you contributed. They appear to be notable, but it would be good if you can add more secondary sources such as magazine or newspaper articles or interviews with participants.

To reply, leave a comment on Roches's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Template:User over 9000, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User over 9000 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User over 9000 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1999 in sports may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |[1999_in_Pride_FC#Pride_7|Pride 7]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Prod'd the Thomas Vasquez since I thought he did not meet the requirements. I am guessing you are counting Strikeforce Challengers which I understood to be separate from Strikeforce and more in line with TUF events. In the article it is listed as amateur and under ShoMMA if you click on the event. I looked but could not find the discussion about this, there was one, it might have been under another AfD debate. I put back the notability tag but would like an opinion before taking it further.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It is entirely possible that there was a conversation stating that amateur fights do not count toward notability. If that's the case we should update WP:MMABIO. Currently it does not say that individual fights all need not be amateur, only that "Amateur MMA fighters are not considered notable". Perhaps we should clarify that. Either way to imply that an athlete must be paid to be considered notable does not seem in line with the rest of Wikipedia:Notability (sports), both in the "This page in a nutshell" and in several sports individual listings it states that amateur sports count toward notability. Kevlar (talk) 15:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking around some more I think most of the discussions revolved around the inclusion of TUF fights as top tier (ie. not part of UFC) with a week extension to Strikeforce Challengers who as with TUF don't fight the big boys. The TUF discussions are easy to find in the archive. In the end TUF finale fights were considered ok but others not and on reflection Strikeforce Challengers seems quite similar to TUF finals. Since I can't find cases were we have repetitive participation in Strikeforce Challengers I think I will let the matter drop and count them. Not sure how Carl Malenko got Prod'd - sorry about that.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jeimeson Saudino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KDS4444^Talk 05:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy but (as discussed on my talk page) there should be some note as to why the person is notable in the article. Not everyone who reads is familiar with the quidelines.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yohei Suzuki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in World Series of Fighting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Wade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be agreement on the MMA talk page that most, if not all, WSOF events are not notable. Feel free to put some of them up for AfD (especially those that haven't even occurred yet). That or redirect them to an omnibus article on WSOF events. I thought about putting some up, but then I remembered the abuse I took a few years ago in dealing with MMA articles. Times may, or may not, have changed but I prefer not to be the first man out of the foxhole. Papaursa (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2010 in Strikeforce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Cooper. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the instructions on the AfD page - I am doing what I can to properly register them but its a mess. The way its set-up after a certain point its not a simple matter of continuing the process. Cheers.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeimeson Saudino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeimeson Saudino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 14:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kevlar, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:

ART+FEMINISM EDIT-A-THON

• Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon
• Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)
• Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare

RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ninite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OpenOffice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Great idea for WikiProject editors. Didn't think of it myself, and I think of a lot of things that aren't obvious. Jak474 (talk) 23:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HiKevlar. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy. One of these restrctions is WP:NFCC#9, which says that non-free content can only be used in the article namespace. Non-free content cannot be used (i.e., displayed) in the user namespace as explained in WP:UP#Non-free files which is why I have removed a number of such files from User:Kevlar/sandbox. If you have any more questions about this, you can ask me here or ask others for help at WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you wouldn't mind, could you give your vote on this? Thanks. TBMNY (talk) 05:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Koba Tkeshelashvili has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable MMA fighter - will never meet WP:NMMA

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 09:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevlar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iouri Bekichev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iouri Bekichev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MMAevent headers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Banaszak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Banaszak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of M-1 Global events is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of M-1 Global events until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Serrano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Serrano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 02:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in mixed martial arts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MMA upcoming fight has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Upcoming MMA fights indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Jones (mixed martial artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Jones (mixed martial artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 11:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MMA box collapsible has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Cahoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Cahoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 02:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Heatherly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Heatherly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 02:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry Papadopoulos, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Papadopoulos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Miller (mixed martial artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Miller (mixed martial artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 20:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Razak Al-Hassan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razak Al-Hassan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 04:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Olson (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Olson (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandals2 (talk) 19:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cody Carrillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Carrillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 20:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cain Carrizosa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cain Carrizosa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 18:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Heatherly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Heatherly (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HeinzMaster (talk) 01:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Rhodes (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Rhodes (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 19:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Heatherly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Heatherly (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 20:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Rahnavardi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Rahnavardi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 00:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felix Mitchell (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Mitchell (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 14:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Cella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Cella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 22:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rico Disciullo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rico Disciullo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 10:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marvin Maldonado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Maldonado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 22:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masaya Inoue, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masaya Inoue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Brown (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Brown (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cassiopeia talk 23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Nilson (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Nilson (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nswix (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]