User talk:Kart2401real

Hi Kart2401real! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

The article Sun Damage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 22:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you made a change to an article, United States Senate election in Maine, 2018, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 03:45, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Everything to Me (Liz Phair song), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Sjrct (talk) 03:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations must be from reliable sources -- your use of Breitbart is not an acceptable source -- and citations must directly support the information being presented -- the citation you provided for your edit on Nazi salute said nothing about Palestinians using the Nazi salute. Please be careful in your use of sources. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States House of Representatives elections in California, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Applegate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I posted voter intention polls like this one, and they got deleted. I thought they might be useful. I would like to get a consensus on whether or not they should be included. Kart2401real (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael Eisen is still in this race no matter how much money he got. he is still in the race there is no news sotry out saying he didn't qualify for the ballot. Do you have a Source to back up your clam? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.36.68.29 (talk) 23:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• He withdrew or didn't qualify for the ballot, according to CA Secretary of State. Kart2401real (talk) 00:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate election in West Virginia, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evan Jenkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's fixed now. Kart2401real (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress#Capitals. —GoldRingChip 12:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, after your recent edit on the CA house races with bolding the Top 2 finishers in the primary, I wanted to tell you that all other California House election pages do not bold the Top 2 finishers, just the winner in the November general election. For that reason, I think the Top 2 finishers should be left as is without bolding them. VietPride10 (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bolding them is useful for highlighting the primary winners. It's done for the US Senate race and the gubernatorial race. Kart2401real (talk) 03:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kart2401real: I understand that, but that is a different scenario for the senate and governor race. They have separate primary and general election boxes. When the boxes are combined as in the CA house races, CA assembly/senate races, the top 2 are never bolded, which has always been precedent. Bolding them makes it seem repetitive when the general election results/top 2 finishers are directly underneath it. VietPride10 (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect No party preference (United States). Since you had some involvement with the No party preference (United States) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits on the CA 2018 house articles because you broke the precedent with how California elections are formatted in the voting table. Please look at the precedents with the 2012, 2014, 2016 CA house elections to see that there is one voting table because of the top-two primaries, not two. VietPride10 (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kart2401real! Nice to meet you. Constance Gadell-Newton's photo was discussed on Talk:Ohio gubernatorial election, 2018, and we ended up adding it. It appears you have an opinion on this matter [3] [4] Feel free to express your concerns on the talk page. Maybe we can work something out! --Elephanthunter (talk) 03:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5% is the benchmark needed to include third party candidates. Add only if Gadell-Newton finishes the election with 5+%. Kart2401real (talk) 03:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about on the ballot itself? WVXU says, "Constance Gadell-Newton, the Green party candidate, also will be on the November ballot."^[1] But you could be right. Your argument might be of interest to other people watching that talk page, so maybe we could discuss over there.

If you're talking about Wikipedia policy having to do with percentages, I am admittedly skeptical. I would need a link to the page where this decision is listed. --Elephanthunter (talk) 03:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. It took me a moment, but I found references to the 5% benchmark you mentioned. It's not a hard rule, but I suppose it's precedent.

I won't press putting the photo in the header. I am going to suggest putting the photo further down the article. As precedent: 1 2. Does that sound like a reasonable compromise? --Elephanthunter (talk) 07:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress#Chronological order of polls. —GoldRingChip 12:41, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mick Cornett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Todd Lamb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm curious to why you picked a different color for the (United States) disambiguator instead of using the same color as Template:No party preference/meta/color. Shouldn't we standardize on one color? Legoktm (talk) 02:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Election box open primary general election no party no change has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 23:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In re Grand Jury Subpoena (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pete Buttplug. Since you had some involvement with the Pete Buttplug redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 18:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mayor Cheat. Since you had some involvement with the Mayor Cheat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- MrX 🖋 12:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC),12:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kart2401real! I was really impressed with the quality of the NC-9 special election map you made, and I have a request I am hoping you could do. On the same day as the special election for NC-9, there was another election to fill a vacancy for NC-3. Do you think you could make a map for this election? I have found a map with the county results published by The New York Times, which I am sharing here: [5]. If you could make this map, I would really appreciate it. Thanks! Count Awesome (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that when you make changes to content, you often make repeated small changes or corrections; your 4-27 update adding three entries to the 2019 opinion list, for example, was composed of 19 edits, made within minutes of each other.[6] You can avoid this by using the "show preview" button to confirm your change is correct and complete. A related issue is the fact that you almost never use edit summaries, which makes it especially hard to see what individual edits are changing or why. Please start using edit summaries to explain your edits, and avoid rapid fire, successive edits to the same page. Thank you, postdlf (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that yellow is a better color, both in terms of what it feels like it signifies and in terms of its legibility in separating out yellow opinions and lighter yellow joining votes. Please discuss first any other changes you'd like to propose to the color scheme, but I think it was all better off as it was. That the black text is less visible on gray is one reason why I used persisted in using silver on the individual opinion lists, but as it is exceedingly uncommon on the term lists (one opinion in twenty years of cases) it isn't worth fretting much about there. postdlf (talk) 16:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When decisions are per curiam, should we presume that a justice is in the majority unless publicly noted otherwise? Justices sometimes secretly dissent. Kart2401real (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if a dissent is not reported then it is assumed that they have joined it. I don't think they ever "secretly dissent", though they may dissent without separate opinion; then it would still have been noted in the Court's opinion that "Justice Ginsburg would deny certiorari" or something like that to indicate disagreement with the ruling. postdlf (talk) 17:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article notes that it is a fact that justices sometimes secretly dissent without noting anything. SCOTUSblog lists here that the vote is not available, not 6-3. What should be done here? Kart2401real (talk) 17:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to post your question at WT:SCOTUS for more input, but the assumption of joining is really the only workable one we've ever had, and we only ever have the Court's own record to go by. I think it's really more a theoretical issue than an actual one, that blog post notwithstanding (his observation that he has "never seen a per curiam dissent" is either really subtle sarcasm or indicates he doesn't understand what it really means for an opinion to be per curiam). postdlf (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He knows what a per curiam opinion means, unsigned, not listing an individual justice or justices. More evidence that they might silently dissent. If a justice later admits to a silent dissent, what should be done, add a new symbol? Kart2401real (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per curiam means "by the Court", which is why it's not signed by an individual justice as author. The premise is it's authored by the institution collectively. Which is why a per curiam dissent is an oxymoronic impossibility; the Court cannot dissent from its own ruling, only individual justices can. BTW [7] seems to be talking about votes on/dissents from orders, such as denial of certiorari (about which it is well known that the votes are never public except where a dissenting opinion is filed...which is why we do not purport to count those), not votes/dissents regarding opinions of the Court. We have a code already for dissenting without separate opinion, and if it isn't evident from the reported opinion(s) we could add a footnote to the list in support and explanation. But let's cross that road when we come to it, and we'd need a broader discussion from more participants as to when it's ever (if at all) appropriate to note an action in a case that the Court itself has not reported, something I am not aware of anyone ever needing to address. postdlf (talk) 18:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What should be done with the opinion table if in individual justice admits to casting a dissenting vote without noting it? Kart2401real (talk) 21:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Garden Grove, California mayoral election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Garden Grove, California mayoral election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SecretName101 (talk) 02:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion nomination has been expanded to also include 2018 Garden Grove, California mayoral election, 2016 Garden Grove, California mayoral election, and 2018 Garden Grove, California elections. Deletion discussion is located here. SecretName101 (talk) 20:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Falling Uphill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fields.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Fenix TX band members is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Fenix TX band members until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – DarkGlow (✉) 14:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think the article should stay because the band had many lineup changes. William Salazar is the only one to have been in the band the entire time. I think more sources can be cited. Kart2401real (talk) 15:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Make It All Show, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Make It All Show.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Citrivescence (talk) 03:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Citrivescence: I feel it is notable enough, especially with a guest appearance from Exene Cervenka. It has both an Allmusic review and a Drowned in Sound review. Kart2401real (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kart2401real: Please go directly to the deletion discussion and weigh in there. Also, note that I'm recommending the page be merged and redirected to the band's article, not deleted totally. -Citrivescence (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Make It All Show, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Make It All Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kart2401real! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Band member history timeline questions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kart2401real. Hope you're doing well. I came across your name when I saw you had created {{Infobox US Supreme Court case}}, which I'm a bit confused about in light of the existence of {{Infobox SCOTUS case}}. That's something that I don't quite have time to look into more right now, but I noticed that you hadn't used an edit summary or provided much documentation so that curious folks like me can understand what the purpose of the template is or why it differs from the established one. But that's not why I'm writing today.

Rather, I see that you've recently redirected List of Korn band members (an article that's been around since 2007 and is viewed more than 4000 times a month) to Korn#Band members. I couldn't find a discussion either in your edit summary or on Talk:List of Korn band members. Was there a merger discussion or other discussion at any point about this?

In any event, I see that you don't generally use edit summaries – may I ask if there's a reason? Edit summaries make it a lot easier on other editors. I know that sometimes it can be easy to forget, and it can be a hassle to fill them out on occasion; if that's why, I'm happy to point you to a few scripts and preferences that might make it easier for you. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 08:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will now use them. I put an explanation on the talk page for Talk:List of Korn band members#Is is appropriate to have a Korn band member page? It isn't necessary to have a list page for a band that only replaced one member (drummer David Silveria). Paramore replaced three members (Jason Bynum, Hunter Lamb, and Jeremy Davis) and didn't have a member page. Excluding the band's history as Riverfenix, the Fenix TX lineup changed six times, with ten members in the band's history under that name. Fenix TX isn't notable enough to have a member page. How many members in a notable band's history is enough for a members page? Kart2401real (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lit (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stan Frazier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

O.N.R. ^(talk) 18:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. CUPIDICAE💕 18:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Kart2401real: Please explain your creation of the above redirect. I'm sure you can imagine my surprise that it was not in fact created by a new troll account, but by an editor with 12k edits who I can only assume understands WP:BLP is a policy and not a suggestion. CUPIDICAE💕 18:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it on the NBC Sports site. I thought it was notable because notable people used that attack. I did not mean to personally attack anyone. For example, Lyin Ted has a redirect page to Ted Cruz. Should that be deleted too? Kart2401real (talk) 18:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to read WP:BLP. I'm no fan of Rothelisberger but this violates WP policy. Lyin Ted does not direct to Ted Cruz, it directs to the article on slurs Trump has used. CUPIDICAE💕 18:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now. If it redirected to Cruz, should it be deleted? Kart2401real (talk) 18:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kart2401real, I noticed your work on File:2019 NC-09 special.svg and other congressional district maps, and I was wondering if you could create a county results map for the 2006 and 2008 elections in Florida's 16th congressional district. You can find the map of the district overlaid on its counties here and here, and the results are available for 2006 here and 2008 here. I request this because I am really trying to improve the Tim Mahoney article, and the additions of results maps on his page would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 22:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I understand that Draft:List of Paramore band members is important to you, but honestly, if you want for there to be any hope of this draft reaching the mainspace, you need to spend less time on the members and timeline sections and more time – as I've mentioned before – on the body of the article, which is still nowhere near publishable. You've made 450 edits to this page and majority of them have been to the members and timeline sections; you've even put more time into the (in my opinion, completely unnecessary) lineups section than the body. Anyway, just thought I'd reach out, as I don't think you're getting anywhere with this draft and doubt it will be published if you continue with this current editing pattern. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 02:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can a draft be deleted? Kart2401real (talk) 02:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes – why's that? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 03:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because my draft might never be complete enough Kart2401real (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough – did you want for it to be deleted (in which case I can request deletion under WP:G7)? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Save it for now. More lineup changes and sources might come. Kart2401real (talk) 17:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but if, say, a month goes by and we're still in this same position, we might have to revisit this discussion – I'm not trying to give you a hard timeline or anything, but it's starting to feel a lot like you just want to experiment with timelines, etc., which is what your sandbox is for. For example, with your recent edits, where is this "Other guitar" stuff coming from, and why does it only apply to Williams from the start of this year onwards – do you have a source? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 01:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I like to experiment with the timelines. The article is unpublished. I thought Williams might play occasional guitar on the next album. I forgot about the sandbox. Just delete the draft then. Kart2401real (talk) 01:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough; I've copied the text from the draft to here so that you can do as you please with it (improve the body, experiment with other sections, add pictures, etc.), whether it be in your sandbox or off-wiki. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 02:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Fenix TX band members, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Fenix TX band members".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox US Supreme court cases has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm _Talk 14:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Election box winning candidate no party with winner has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/American Delta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/American Solidarity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party shading/United Utah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 01:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US COA tablekey has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Chaos County Line, is not suitable as written to remain published. Product release this long is an advert. scope_creep^Talk 20:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skating Polly has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Damon Johnson has been touring with Skynyrd for the past two years, and he still continues to tour with the band despite Rossington's death, that should make him an official member in my opinion. Rossington chose him to replace him. P.J. (talk) 12:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather have an announcement of some sort. Continuing to tour doesn't necessarily make him an official member. OAR has touring sideman Mikel Paris, who is not a substitute or official member. I think we should wait until an announcement or album credits to be released. Kart2401real (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well there was no official announcement of Keith Christopher as their new bass player back in 2017 but he was on the current lineup. Keith Christopher was on the list way before the Last of the Street Surviviors Blu Ray came out. P.J. (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What if a future release lists Damon Johnson as a sideman? Kart2401real (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

than we can change it back I guess. P.J. (talk) 19:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chaos County Line, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chaos County Line".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlanta Falcons retired numbers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Carolina Panthers retired numbers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cincinnati Bengals retired numbers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jacksonville Jaguars retired numbers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Washington Nationals retired numbers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miami Marlins retired numbers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 Garden Grove, California mayoral election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Homesite (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bare Feet (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Homesite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bare Feet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kart2401real. Thank you for making the map for the district attorney election. Is it possible for you to create more maps for this election, such as a precinct map? Thank you, C. W. Edward (talk) 03:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]