User talk:ji11720

Dinizia jueirana-facao, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 23:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
47		Albany Bulb (talk)	Add sources
10		Pamoja FM (talk)	Add sources
11		Long Shadows (talk)	Add sources
15		Freddy Moncada (talk)	Add sources
782		Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (talk)	Add sources
65		Warriors: Omen of the Stars (talk)	Add sources
83		James Orengo (talk)	Cleanup
2,689		Sith (talk)	Cleanup
106		Brazilian German (talk)	Cleanup
83		Kenya Television Network (talk)	Expand
249		Espírito Santo (talk)	Expand
137		Sub-Counties of Kenya (talk)	Expand
60		Raphael Tuju (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
94		Muranga County (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
120		Miguna Miguna (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
176		Khmer Rouge rule of Cambodia (talk)	Merge
149		Photomask (talk)	Merge
106		Route number (talk)	Merge
421		Raila Odinga (talk)	Wikify
84		Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (talk)	Wikify
175		Kojo Annan (talk)	Wikify
2		Akui N'dekre Elie Moises (talk)	Orphan
2		Aradhya Malhotra (talk)	Orphan
4		Alison Rogers (talk)	Orphan
15		Johnson Muthama (talk)	Stub
11		David Musila (talk)	Stub
6		Iona Macintyre (talk)	Stub
13		John Munyes (talk)	Stub
6		Dinizia (talk)	Stub
3		Sucrea (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ji11720! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 07:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you split glossary, make absolutely sure you maintain page's history including revisions, page creator, etc. See glossary talk page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.192.155 (talk)

Hi, just some advice. You seem to be have gotten twisted up in some activists who go around trying to split articles everywhere. However that's generally not appreciated by many people who actually contribute to those articles and usually requires specialized knowledge to know when, where, and how to split a topic. Your recent split of glossary of engineering was pushed by those activists and I note you have no history of editing that page (nor that I do either). It should not have been split as it greatly reduces the usefulness of the page. Additionally your split caused numerous intra-article links to be broken (namely where an article links to other parts of it's own article). I am personally in favor of reverting your split, but this is difficult as a new page was created where the old page was. Ergzay (talk) 17:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t explain, but I basically wanted there to be a page with every U.S. senator, which there currently isn’t. Many times I do use a summary, but I didn’t here and for that I apologize. I hope that explains my actions, and if you're interested, perhaps we can work on that together. :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoliticallyPassionateGamer (talk • contribs) 22:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, sorry about that. I didn't realize your intentions.

Secondly, in general don't blank or remove a significant amount of content from pages without explaining why in an edit summary.

Thirdly, before you create such a page, I recommend that consulting with a relevant WikiProject, like WikiProject U.S. Congress; the people there may have a better idea of what does and doesn't deserve its own article than I do. Ji11720 (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I can do better than that. I'm glad that you've consulted me towards them, I had no idea tbh PoliticallyPassionateGamer (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you undo the Charlie Powell (presenter) deletion please? I would still like to work on it. Regards, Steve. Spifflepoos (talk) 11:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't undo the deletion for you. You'll either need to ask Wikipedia:Deletion review or recreate it yourself.

As a side note, if you do recreate it, I'd suggest creating it in draftspace and submitting it through AfC, so you can get the feedback of more experienced editors. Ji11720 (talk) 12:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: You can actually get it undeleted. Just go file a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13. Ji11720 (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daedalea circularis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding archiving to pages. Just so you are aware, you need to be careful when archiving pages using a quick template. For example, in your recent archiving of Joseph's Tomb, ive noticed you used {{subst:FULLPAGENAME}} (or similar), which isnt perfect, and actually returns Talk:Joseph&​#39;s Tomb in this case. Essentially, if a page's title has punctuation, make sure to double-check the archiving worked. Other than that, you're all fine. Thanks! (Found via this category) Aidan9382 _(talk) 17:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me. I'll keep an eye out in the future. ji11720 (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs at least some detail of this actual species otherwise is adds nothing to just being listed on Daedalea. Such articles if accepted are unlikely to be deleted as species are notable, but are likely to just be redirected to Daedalea due to adding nothing about the particular species

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daedalea allantoidea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daedalea allantoidea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ji11720! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allen Career Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Allen Career Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 04:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ji11720. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daedalea allantoidea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ji11720. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eriobotrya bengalensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ji11720,

I just wanted to thank you for your help tagging the expiring drafts today. We have three admins who usually take care of them, me, Explicit and Hey man im josh. Now, Hey man im josh doesn't edit on the weekends, Explicit has been away for days now and I'm staying with my mother who is on hospice care so I spend much of my time helping her out. Plus, there was a big AFC backlog drive in November 2023 so there are many more drafts facing CSD G13 than in a typical month. There are usually about ~150 expiring drafts/day and on May 1st we had over 400 drafts! And since May 1st it's been regularly over 200 drafts. So, the work has been piling up and thanks to you, I think we are all caught up!

The only thing Josh and I are sticklers for are a) checking the page history to make sure there have been no recent edits to the page and b) posting a talk pag notification to content creators to tell them that their draft has been deleted and how they can get it restored. It looks like you have been doing that notification with Twinkle so thanks for that, too. Your help on the project is appreciated! Have a good week. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]