User talk:Jaladhi2020

Hello, Jayshukla2006, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ekabhishek^talk 15:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Disha Vakani, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. wikipedia is not a fansite or for WP:PROMOTION. Only add encyclopedic content, which is referenced. Just discovered you have clearing up your talk page, and have a history>Nevertheless hope you are using it to give yourself a fresh start! - Ekabhishek^talk 15:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

source for the update is - http://www.filmyfolks.com/kmh/disha-wakani.shtmlJayshukla2006 (talk) 10:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chandola Lake Photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person, Shailesh Lodha, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC) hi MusikAnimal...thanks for your suggestion. I have included the source of edit. Hope the insertion is alright now.Jayshukla2006 (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chandola Lake.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jaladhi2020, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Chandola Lake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaladhi2020. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#Review_of_Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation.2FChandola_Lake.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kathiyawadi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks for your views...i have removed the reference of reunion from my editsJayshukla2006 (talk) 13:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kondh, Surendranagar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaladhi2020. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#User:Jayshukla2006.2Fsandbox.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jayshukla2006/sandbox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jaladhi2020. --Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin (talk) 04:18, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ratanpar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rajcharadi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rampara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What's the deal with this? I hope its a just a mistake. There's no call for deleting this inoffensive disambiguation page at all, let alone speedily. Be careful when tagging articles for speedy deletion, please! Herostratus (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page has multiple issues for speedy deletion like No citations, references, insufficient data etc. Hence, nominated for speedy deletion.Jaladhi (talk) 05:48, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages don't need and in fact seldom have references and all that other stuff. They are essentially indexes or tables of contents. See WP:DISAMBIGUATION for more details. Herostratus (talk) 08:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello సుల్తాన్ ఖాదర్,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kavitha (actress) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jaladhi (talk) 12:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaladhi2020 , Kavitha (actress) is an south Indian actress , popularly known in Telugu Language and Tamil_language. you can find the details here and her pictures here. I am highly disappointed by your act of deleting it without giving me proper time. You should have done a Google search before doing such act. I am now feeling that I have wasted my time in writing wiki articles. Please try to know about the article before you doing such kind of action. Being a Wiki Admin, you should not misuse your deletion Privileges. I hope you re create the article and can ask some more details. Since you don't know South Indian languages, You should not show discrimination on them.--సుల్తాన్ ఖాదర్ (talk) 07:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article you created was very short and lacked importance of the subject for the world wide users to understand. It is deleted as per deletion policy of the wikipedia. Please refer Articles for Creation to create meaningful new pages.Jaladhi (talk) 09:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gana Village, Anand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Surender Nada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Prof TPMS (talk) 14:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference confirms significance. Jaladhi (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaladhi2020. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Uzham, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional, identifies the the subject of the article, and a film directed by Jeethu Joseph starring Prithviraj Sukumaran would be notable. WP:NFF is the issue here. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have declined your speedy deletion request at Kanji homograph, as all three reasons you gave were inapplicable...

• G11 - it did not appear to consist of advertising or promotion at all
• A1 - the context is very clear
• A7 - only applies to "individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events"

Please take care when reviewing new articles, and please do not make speedy deletion requests until you understand the categories. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC) ok. Page is marked as unreviewed. Jaladhi (talk) 05:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• At Kapil bagla you were right with your A7 nomination, but A1 was incorrect - it clearly stated that the subject is "CEO and Director Adlabs Entertainment Ltd". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

ok Jaladhi (talk) 05:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have just nominated a perfectly good disambiguation page at Andheri station with the reason "no context". "No context" seems to be one of your favourite reasons, but I don't think you even understand what the word "context" means! You are making far too many mistakes in your nominations for deletion, and I ask you now to STOP making all speedy deletion nominations until you have a lot more experience and you actually understand what all the reasons mean. These really are basic errors that anyone with a good command of English and a basic understanding of Wikipedia's requirements should not be making, and if you continue like this then I will block you from editing - I really don't want to, but bad nominations like these can drive away new editors. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• You did exactly the same with GTK (TV show), which is another disambig page that you claimed had no context. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok notedJaladhi (talk) 08:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	congrats on extended confirmed user Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaladhi2020. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaladhi2020. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaladhi2020. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rishank Devadiga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rishank Devadiga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hagennos (talk) 20:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not keep reinstating the reference to the blacklisted website www.onefivenine.com. If you want details, please read the note at WP:195. Also please be aware of the the manual of style guide located at WP:INDICSCRIPT which says Avoid the use of Indic scripts in the lead sections or infoboxes... Thanks. Prince of Thieves (talk) 11:31, 17 March 2018 (UTC) ok noted but do not revert other edits.Jaladhi (talk) 05:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaladhi2020. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]