User talk:IreneLouie

Hello, IreneTandry! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 07:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi IreneTandry, there are many differences between Argentinosaurs and Apatosaurus though many of them require looking closely at the shapes of bones, like different shaped vertebrae. Looking at the life appearance of these dinosaurs, the biggest differences would be: Argentinosaurs had longer legs than Apatosaurus and the front legs were as long as the back legs; in Apatosaurus the back legs were much longer. The tail of Apatosaurus was much longer than the tail of Argentinosaurs, and it ended in a whiplash. American Film Institute Awards 2016 The neck of Apatosaurus was much thicker but the neck of Argentinosaurs was longer. Apatosaurus had one claw on the front feet while Argentinosaurs had no claws on the front feet. Take a look at the different body outlines to see general differences in their shapes. Hope this helps! Dinoguy2 (talk) 15:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your nice edits at the page for Accolades for The Revenant suggested you might be a good person to ask about the short Accolades section at the film's main page. Could you take a look at it when and if time allows for possible updates at The Revenant (2015 film). Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 18:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Irene. I'm new to Wikipedia, as a contributor. I've just edited the page of The Conjuring 2, inserting an aspect about symbolism, with a reference from the website Geoffreview (who I've contacted on Facebook, their saying it's okay for me to reference their review). Would you mind just checking the page, and confirming that everything's okay with the edits? Thanks. Thomas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marieltrokan (talk • contribs) 15:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IreneTandry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left that editor a polite message. And may I say that I, for one, appreciate your hard work and diligence on the film articles. I'm sure I speak for many of our fellow editors when I say how good it is to have another mature and responsible editor in WP:FILM. Thank you! --Tenebrae (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Irene. I saw that you were blocked following a recent ANI discussion. I've seen your edits for film awards crop up on my watchlist and they always look good, so it's a shame to see an editor in that subject area gone from the project. I'm not supporting your actions that lead to your block, but if you do feel like requesting an unblock, then please do. I've wanted to tell many editors how I feel, but in the main, I've held back. It's tough to hold it in sometimes, but if you want to continue your good work, then please think about it and forming a well thought-out apology. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts: I just protect that film awards from the worse users. Tenebrae said that to me, so I try to follow the rule. No, I won't come back. I won't say "sorry" to them. If they're smart, do it, block my user talk page. For EEng, you said I'm childish and yes, I still "the kid" who follow the rule.... So, don't call me to this Wikipedia or send any messages to this user page again. I work and edit at "the neighbor" Wikipedia. I want to "clean this user talk page" because they make my user talk page dirty.

@Linguist111: Go ahead and revoke my user talk page access. I won't come back to this Wikipedia. (Personal attack removed). Then, make this user talk page empty.

IreneTandry (talk) 12:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly did not want to do this IreneTandry - I gave you clear advice and asked you to stop. I understand you're feeling frustrated, but taking it out directly on other users is not the way to deal with it - calm down, and if you feel like you're going to be able to discuss things in a civil manner please email me and I will give you talk page access back -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 13:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IreneLouie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18003 was submitted on Apr 11, 2017 13:53:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IreneLouie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18009 was submitted on Apr 12, 2017 02:10:54. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been evading this block basically the entire time, including while they had open UTRS requests. See User:HenleeDiscette's contribs. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]