User talk:Inowen

Welcome to Wikipedia, Inowen! Thank you for your contributions. I am QuackGuru and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! QuackGuru (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Criticism of has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has the form of a disambiguation page but isn't a valid once. Its title isn't a topic, and it's just a list of articles that start with those two words, which MOS:DAB points out isn't what dab pages are for.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 00:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think you just wanted a way to list all articles with titles beginning with "Criticism of". You can get that from searching at Special:PrefixIndex. Largoplazo (talk) 00:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Original programs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

These are all WP:PTMs at best.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Protection of women has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Gets no information across. Written like a reflective essay.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 11:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Protection of children has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Same article as protection of women, and this too is a reflection essay that passes on no information to the reader

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 11:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your articles on protecting women and children to draft space at Draft:Protection of women and Draft:Protection of children. Articles shouldn't be in main article space until they at least have some specific information, while these have only some vague generalities at the moment. See WP:Drafts. Largoplazo (talk) 12:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Outliner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Text

Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Audio

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Inowen, many thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I have just reviewed your new article Global policy. I noticed that you do not give any sources or external verifications that confirm the contents of the article. While there is some high level sense to the bullets, we can only publish on Wikipeida something that has been stated or published elsewhere. Wikipedia is not a place for original research. I have marked the article accordingly. Many thanks _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:00, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Globalization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 1800s

Invasion of Quebec (1775) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Quebec

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inowen. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Global policy, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global policy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global policy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 09:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First things is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First things until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inowen,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Government (disambiguation) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government (disambiguation) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Isingness (talk) 06:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Empire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2018 (UTC) Please do not add or change content, as you did at Southern Europe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Without sources, and with the term "mighht include", your addition looks like a personal analysis or opinion, which is not allowed in Wikipedia per WP:OR. Thank you. --T*U (talk) 09:55, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Criticism of WhatsApp. Since you had some involvement with the Criticism of WhatsApp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 14:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religious controversies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depiction of religious figures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WLC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't in anyway helpful, links should be to articles. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 21:24, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Linking dos and don'ts. Doug Weller talk 21:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Deception (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Subterfuge

Hybrid vehicle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Energy efficiency

Steam engine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Work

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Time are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deception, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subterfuge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evil, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Defense and Strife (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cold living, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. General Ization ^Talk 20:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Live-work space, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The editor whose username is Z0 17:34, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm Z0. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The editor whose username is Z0 17:34, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inowen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Protection of women".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inowen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Protection of children".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uberisation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Network (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi regarding your creation of Boston Massacre (disambiguation), do familiarize yourself with MOS:DABPRIMARY (separate the primary topic) and MOS:DABENTRY (use a comma instead of a dash for entries). Also, do try and add relevant Wikiprojects to the talk page. Thanks for creating the dab page. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your new page to the above location as it's not acceptable for the mainspace. Please work on it there instead. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 20:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to this draft at the Mathematics talk page. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 11:40, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Prejudice (disambiguation), Inowen!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please refer to MOS:DABPRIMARY (primary topic should be separated) and MOS:DABPIPING.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 02:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electric motor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Two-phase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 19:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Democracy and the United Kingdom, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electric vehicle conversion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Combustion engine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Jesus are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 08:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you might have noticed I reverted a bunch of edits you made to String theory. I did so because I don't think they improved the article. For instance, you wrote "Instead of treating space like a general field with some simplistic "temperature,"..." which just doesn't seem to make much sense. If you don't agree, let's discuss here (or on the article talk page), I'm sure we can converge on a way to improve the wording. Thanks. Waleswatcher (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jazz. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 04:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boston Massacre (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Massacre (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Extrasensory perception (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnecessary disambiguation per WP:ONEOTHER. Extrasensory perception is the primary topic, and a hatnote to the book of the same name is sufficient. The guitar company is covered at ESP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fourfold has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• PS: In addition to the simple four, there are cases where each of or just two of the elements has a sub-element, which would be an extra smaller row. This would perhaps be in a different template, rather than code the one with conditional statements. At basis is the elemental idea of a this/that difference being at the base of logic, and helpful in logical discussions. The fourfold is an ancient teaching tool. Sometimes the fourfold is used for a four-list, this/~this/~that/that, a list with four elements, where the four are complete and the graph serves to symbolize that the elements inside make up the complete list. These are the basis for categorical thinking, where the elements, evenly divided, are rigourously logical.-Inowen (nlfte) 21:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just wanted to let you know that I moved your thread on the village pump to the reference desk here. Since it seems like it is where it belongs. zchrykng (talk) 03:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of copyleft licenses, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fundamental principles. Since you had some involvement with the Fundamental principles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Colonestarrice (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Inowen! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 08:45, Saturday, November 10, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Hi Inowen! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 08:46, Saturday, November 10, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

C. S. Peirce wrote A neglected argument for the reality of God --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 05:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also Alhazen, also known as Alhacen — "Truth is sought for its own sake", and

Plato, Aristotle, Socrates and Vizzini, Princess Bride

Thanks for that. -Inowen (nlfte) 05:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big questions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big questions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  ‑ Iridescent 08:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where to start.?. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 12:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You repeated insertion of POV and "Citation needed" tags are not appreciated, as there are 4 high-quality references stating the natural process. In total there are 338 references in this article to natural biochemical evolution and related processes/hypotheses. None are about magic. Thank you. Rowan Forest (talk) 23:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] is ill-advised. See WP:STICK and WP:SNOW. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Human identity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Natureium (talk) 03:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Face type, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Face type and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Face type during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 03:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Face type is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Face type until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natureium (talk) 03:54, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I saw that you moved Landmark Cases to be a redirect to Lists of landmark court decisions. There were a number of incoming links to the page for the C-SPAN series that ended up pointing to the new target, Lists of landmark court decisions. I am going to point them back towards the C-SPAN series article. KConWiki (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't remove relevant notices or change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 12:52, February 4, 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. You've been here long enough to know the basics of NPOV, RS, and V. Your comments appear, at best, disingenuous and meant to agitate. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Berlin 2019. Since you had some involvement with the Berlin 2019 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mathglot (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For any reviewing admin, see Special:Permalink/882741519#POV, WP:TEND, and other issues with Inowen. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Note, you have been blocked by a community consensus, which means you are site banned. You may not appeal this block by normal unblock processes, and you cannot simply convince an individual admin to unblock you. You need to go by WP:UNBAN and secure a community consensus to overturn your ban. In other words, you need to appeal to the community at WP:AN. Realistically speaking, an indefinite community ban will not be overturned by the community for a minimum of six months, with your only recourse being a standard offer request. ~Swarm~ {talk} 09:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Inowen. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Automobile engineering has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Störm (talk) 16:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inowen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Live-work space".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alienation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documents referencing religion, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Religious documents requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Human face has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Human appearance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Human navigational boxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Infinite torque at zero rpm and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 17#Infinite torque at zero rpm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Extreme cold and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 19#Extreme cold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Number transformation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14 § Number transformation until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Housing Crisis (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]