User talk:ItsCheck the 2nd

Hello, I'm Gaismagorm. I noticed that you made a comment on the page 2006 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaismagorm Popular game Roblox was made that year, so it absolutely belongs on the article. Please do not make any further edits to the article, and please refrain from leaving unwelcome messages on other people's talk pages. ItsCheck the 2nd (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it's popularity, but telling others to "shut up" is uncivil and not really allowed on wikipedia. I won't make further edits, but only because I don't want to continue any further conflict and I feel it is best if a more experienced editor deals with this. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaismagorm Thank you for the understanding, and I hope your day goes well. ItsCheck the 2nd (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you too! Gaismagorm (talk) 15:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2006. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

• See Wikipedia:WikiProject Years/criteria ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Loriendrew You were the one who started the edit war by removing content without adequately explaining why and then making personal attacks and insulting me. I can resort to administrator intervention if you keep this up. ItsCheck the 2nd (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsCheck the 2nd as far as I can tell user:Loriendrew has made absolutely 0 personal attacks towards you. Gaismagorm (talk) 15:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaismagorm: That is blatantly false. Loriendrew is evidently bullying me and continues to do so. ItsCheck the 2nd (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsCheck the 2nd could you please provide a clear example of this? Gaismagorm (talk) 17:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaismagorm Scroll up. Loriendrew literally made a false claim that I started the edit war. He was the one who actually started the edit war by reverting my edit thus removing content without adequately explaining why. I already reported him on ANI and hope administrator intervention will resolve this dispute. ItsCheck the 2nd (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsCheck the 2nd while I have very little understanding of who started it, I fully understand that they, at absolutely no point, made an insult directed towards you. Despite this, you claim they have. Not only that but they provided a perfectly acceptable reasoning for removing the content. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaismagorm No they did not. The fact that Roblox is a very popular game cancels out all the reasonings for removing it from the article, even the citation requirement. ItsCheck the 2nd (talk) 17:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsCheck the 2nd before I counter that, could you also explain why you are accusing them of insulting them. Please provide a specific example of an insult they have made against you. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaismagorm Please scroll up and you will see the false claim. False claims fall under personal attacks. Thank you for understanding. ItsCheck the 2nd (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you personally might feel that it's false, but from what I can tell you were at the time involved in an edit war. It doesn't say you started it, it just says you engaged in it. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it appears to impersonate another Wikipedia user. Users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is other disruptive behavior ever allowed. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. For best results, please read the guide to appealing blocks first. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]