User talk:Amicon

• Archive

As you say its only website.I have spent a good hour looking over and thinking about your contribs, and my openion has changed. I'd like to see you back. Forgive and forget? Ceoil (talk) 03:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course :-) Thanks for your kind reconsideration of me. Best wishes, – How do you turn this on (talk) 03:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{welcomeh}}

Oops, I guess you don't need that! How about this instead:

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Good to have you back, —Politizer talk/contribs 23:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I never even left... :D But thanks anyway, I really appreciate that. – Amicon (talk) 23:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I liked it better back when your username was "How do you turn this on." --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 23:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was too long and I fancied a change. – Amicon (talk) 00:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still miss "How do you turn this on," though. :P --Dylan620 _Contribs ^Sign! 00:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to side with Dylan on this one. :) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gah! You'll have to get used to it I guess – Amicon (talk) 00:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, I've only been gone a few days and you've changed your username! I actualy liked HDYTTO, wonder where he went. His username was almost as good as "editorofthewiki"... Anyway, since you worked on Calment I was wondering if you could participate in Lazare Ponticelli's FAR or help with the article yourself. Thanks! ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 01:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a FA?? Good grief. I dunno, I might look at it, but I did intend to keep away from all things FA for a while... – Amicon (talk) 11:59, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it went through while Ling was on vacation. :) ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 21:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change your name and don't tell anybody... I see how you are...---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sneaky. – amicon 12:09, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the birthday wishes. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge TalkContribs, 17:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you still visit this page, but I thought you'd like to know that the article you put a lot of work into is now a GA. Good work. Nev1 (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, but if you could help me with regard to the review process, and what I need to do, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Dannyza1981 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amicon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 371 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Sue Weeks - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eve Karpf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Karpf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The article Seamus Brett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:55, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Davey Arthur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JethRoad the FactBoy 11:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]