[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:Tills

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Fredrik Wilhelm)

Resident Evil: Degeneration

[edit]

The plot was written wrong and I corrected it. I used this as my source and so watched it online (version #3).OsirisV (talk) 18:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


66 keeps adding false information. I wrote for almost every event, major and minor. If one watches the film, they would see that the information being added over mine is false.OsirisV (talk) 20:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for cleaning up vandalism at my user talk page! —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 17:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad I could help. TillsTalk 17:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for USS PGM-17

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 21 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article USS PGM-17, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 06:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of USS PC-496

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of USS PC-496 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer talk/contribs 07:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for USS PGM-18

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 23 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article USS PGM-18, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Politizer talk/contribs 14:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for USS PC-496

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 23 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article USS PC-496, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for USS Wildwood (PC-1181)

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 29 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article USS Wildwood (PC-1181), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USS Asheville (PF-1)

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of USS Asheville (PF-1) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are ome issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

PGM History

[edit]

Hi, I saw that you created the articles on the PGM-1 Class ships active during WWII. I'm currently researching their history, and am in contact with one of the radar men who served on several of the ships. Information is sparse, however. If you have information, photos, or documents that you're willing to share or know of someone who does, I would appreciate it greatly. 74.75.233.206 (talk) 02:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Forgot to sign in) Jeremy Cahill (talk) 02:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for taking so long to respond. Unfortunately I don't have any more information than what you can find in the articles I created. But if you're able to find more in your research please share them with me since I'd like to expand some of those articles. TillsTalk 23:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The veteran I've been speaking to has said that PGM 7 sunk in an attack off Bougainville, not an accidental collision. He has the commissioning pennant in his possession. He also says that the 7 was not the only ship of the PGM-1 class lost. Jeremy Cahill (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to the US Navy it was an accidental collision. [1]. If this veteran has any published documents or something of that nature we could use them. But for now his word violates WP:OR. TillsTalk 21:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm working on that. Where have you looked for archives and the like? Jeremy Cahill (talk) 02:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Besides the DANFS history that were available, I haven't done any more research than a Google search. TillsTalk 17:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for advice on Truthrus edits

[edit]

Thank you for your reverts of recent Truthrus edits to the Tom Krieglstein page. Truthrus appears to be a user profile created specifically to vandalize Krielgstein family Wikipedia pages, referenced [2]. Pgallert and I discussed my conflict of interest with the Tom Krieglstein and Werner Krieglstein and decided I should proceed with extreme caution and include other editors whenever possible when working with these articles. Truthrus edit history seems to indicate a pattern of vandalization which is likely to continue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkriegls (talkcontribs) 23:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering if you think taking disciplinary action against this account would be warranted giving its age of only one day, or should I wait until further vandalism is committed. Also, because of CoI I would appreciate any editors that would help me with taking said action. Thanks for your inputDkriegls (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The user seems to have stopped his vandalism. If he continues report him to WP:AIV and they'll take care of him. TillsTalk 23:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I butchered that, sorry for all the re-edits of my own post. Thanks for the advice. It makes sense to see if the vandalism continues. Dkriegls (talk) 23:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've made two requests for two different usernames. Both appear to be possible per policy, which one do you prefer? –xeno (talk) 14:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like Tills. I requested the second one because someone stated that I wouldn't be able to have my original request because that user had edits. TillsTalk 15:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:George Robert Tills.jpg)

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:George Robert Tills.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — neuro(talk)(review) 17:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing the article that I'm going to use the image for at this very moment. TillsTalk 17:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Next time, please do it the other way around, to avoid issues like this. Have a good day. :) — neuro(talk)(review) 17:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Huffman

[edit]

I'm not sure how to file a grievance or whatever so I'm winging it. I saw a 'WP:Athlete' notice on a page I created for the MLB Class AA San Antonio Missions outfielder, Chad Huffman. I would say he IS a part of the most professional of his sport. He doesn't play for an independent league, but rather a subsidiary to the San Diego Padres organization. He may not be on the San Diego Padres team, but anyday from Class AA or Class AAA, he could be called up to play in the big leagues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjr rodriguez (talkcontribs) 06:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The PROD was contested and I won't be taking it up with WP:AfD. So your article is safe. TillsTalk 09:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, nice little article here. I'd be about ready to assess as MILHIST B-Class but would like to see the intro expanded a bit, say with a sentence or two about his body being lost at time of death but recovered recently, plus para 3 under Career ends without a citation and there really should be one there. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How does it look now? TillsTalk 16:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, tks mate - will assess. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert Tills

[edit]
Updated DYK query On March 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Tills, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPWatcher

[edit]

Hi, Tills. I have granted you NPWatcher per your request here. After looking over a few of your contributions, your talk page, and your block log, I feel you can be trusted with the tool. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. TillsTalk 01:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aking you why

[edit]

Why should I stop there is no policy against it (I did read them) and it's not hurting wikiapedia and may in fact help it by helping me help wikiapedia by being a better editor wiki's Ignore all rules policy defines it because it will ultimately helps wikiapedia. Nulledit (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use the sandbox for your edit tests. TillsTalk 18:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
but the sandbox isn't the "real" Wikipedia editing the real Wikipedia is more helpful in lering how to edit.Nulledit (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Then don't save the edits, but preview them. That way you can see the effects without actually changing anything. TillsTalk 21:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But I'm not actually changing anything if I just undo the edits.Nulledit (talk) 17:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to undo your edits a few times and I had to do it myself, which is why I warned you on your talk page. Since you obviously don't want to change your behavior I fail to see the point in continuing this discussion. Have a good day. TillsTalk 18:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well you have a good day too then. Glad you agree with me.Nulledit (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And would you look at that, you've been blocked. Don't say I didn't try and warn you. TillsTalk 22:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

Sorry, I just want to report ((User:Anti-Greek)) for offensive remarks on my page. Help, thanks. Mordor Greek Penguins!!!! 01:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can report users at WP:AIV. TillsTalk 01:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:USS Crosley (APD-87).jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:USS Crosley (APD-87).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for USS Diachenko (APD-123)

[edit]
Updated DYK query On April 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article USS Diachenko (APD-123), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 03:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I stole your signature =S

[edit]

Hi, just to let you know - I stole your old signature. There is a Big Mac below to pay for it... Cheers, Darren•M540 U|T|C 14:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

[edit]
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

TillsTalk 12:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 360

[edit]

Hello tills, you've changed the name of the column "America" to "North america", you think that not all games are released in central and south america at the same day as north america, and that could be true, but same happens in europe and asia, those are distribution things/issues, those list are guides so people could have a clue when video games where released in their own continents, so it's proper to name the columns as continent and not area.

Cheers!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unholy.Joystick (talkcontribs) 21:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Tills. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:USS Cread (APD-88).jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:USS Cread (APD-88).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]