User talk:Damirgraffiti/2011/July

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Damirgraffiti. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr-Dre kush screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Damirgraffiti. You have new messages at MikeLynch's talk page.
Message added 05:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lynch7 05:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi. A couple of hours ago you said you would be changing your vote. I see you struck your 'Neutral' but did not indent it. If you would like your vote to be counted in the right place, you should now post a vote in the 'Oppose' section, if that is what you intended to do. If you prefer to remain in the 'Neutral' section, just unstrike the neutral. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Damirgraffiti. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 05:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

There are no official minimum criteria for RfA candidates, but based on our recent research, to stand even an even chance of succeeding candidates will generally need:

• To have been a registered user for at least 6 months
• To have opted in for X-tools edit counter.
• Have a clean and fully functioning user signature.
• A minimum of around 6,000 manual edits (average is around 11,000) excluding minor edits.
• Good use (99%) of edit summaries, with appropriate summaries
• To have significantly and intelligently voted on numerous RfA (at least 10 or so)
• To have either created a minimum of around 6 full length non stub articles (excluding redirects), and a GA or a DYK would look good.
• No current tags on any articles
• No naked URLs on articles
• Impeccable references on articles
• No copyvio or plagiarism on articles
• Categories on articles
• Stub tags on any stubs you may have created
• Added a project template to the article's talk page, if appropriate
• Have a cleanly and intelligently laid out user page (no over-eager mentions of wanting awards or to be an admin)
• Have a cleanly and intelligently laid out user talk page (no userboxes, older barnstars, or other non talk page essentials)
• Very few deleted messages on the user talk page
• Very few user warnings, AfD, and PROD notices on the user talk page
• Very few image copyright warnings on the user talk page.
• Extremely civil dialogue on all talk pages
• Have been active at NPP (several 100 patrolls) with a very low number of mis-tagged articles (no more than 2%).
• Have been an active member of an active Wikipedia project.
• Demonstrated significant activity on help desks and noticeboars such as AIV.

--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Well, I do like to spread the wealth, and you certainly are one who deserves it. You've done a great job at the Abuse Response Center and also with editing. Wow, I don't know anyone else who is as dedicated to Wikipedia, other than Chzz, who I swear to this day is a robot. Keep it up.  JoeGazz  ♂  13:50, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

So, do I join? ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 11:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the talk page spam, but Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts's first drive (link here) still has no one exempt me. Would you want to participate? ~~EBE!@#~~ ^talk_Contribs (binary) 22:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Remember to add yourself to the log page. ~~EBE!@#~~ ^talk_Contribs 19:41, 31 July 2011 (UTC)