User talk:Aafi/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Aafi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Draft:De Jure Regni apud Scotos
Hi Aafi, In response to your comments regarding my draft. I added this article because I was browsing throught Wikipedia and snowballed a bit. Then I noticed the book was missing from the books from the years category list. So I just added it and copied all available information from Wikipedia itself. Mainly from this source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Buchanan and specifically from here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Buchanan#Late_works. If you object to the wording you should start there. Furthermore I added some information about Vindiciae contra tyrannos, because I noticed it was published in the same year, also by a Protestant and about the same subject, namely the right of people to revolt against there lord under circumstances.
I understand that this article is not complete, but declining is in my opinion not a strong motivation for people to start adding articles to the largest information source in the world. Particularly because all the information is already around on Wikipedia. I do not add articles on a regular bases, but I do believe in evolutionary improvement of articles. Could it be improved; certainly, but I gladly leave that to others. The article has source references and references to other article to provide context to the information given, so I really don't see what is wrong with all the provided information. I seems to me a relaly good start.
Anyway be free to remove this article; I don't own it nor do I own the information. I just wanted a complete list of books published in some era. For this I needed to add the book so it could be added to the list through its category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:982:49F0:1:41C1:9659:B991:BCBF (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Afc draft submission
Hello Aafi. Would you mind reviewing the article I have created and suggest if it needs any changes. ((Draft:List of presidents of the All-India Muslim League)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DEFCON5 (talk • contribs)
- good work. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. See if you can review it. (Draft:Maulvi Mohammad Zakaullah)defcon5 (talk) 11:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- DEFCON5, wow, what a work. Keep it up. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. See if you can review it. (Draft:Maulvi Mohammad Zakaullah)defcon5 (talk) 11:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Can you review Draft:Angarey. The title may need changes as an article of a movie by the same name also exist. defcon5 (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- DEFCON5, Try introducing more wikilinks in the body and remove the puff words like " great controversy" Regards ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:09, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have made the necessary changes.
- DEFCON5, Try introducing more wikilinks in the body and remove the puff words like " great controversy" Regards ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:09, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Your acceptance script is doing an incomplete cleanup. It didn't remove the AFC tag. No big thing, but you might want to check on it. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Robert McClenon:, I guess this is not any sort of AfC Stuff. Anyways, I had manually cleaned up some stuff after accepting the draft. Your edit also removed the "uncategorised template" from that article which I've readded. Anyways, Thank you, I'll still check if there is any sort of discrepancy in settings. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 04:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
A thought
Please don't copy/paste pages around like you did with Naach and it's related pages. It really does create a big mess for those of us who have to clean it up. Primefac (talk) 01:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
QAI
I tried to give 2021 a good start by updating the QAI project topics. Please check and correct. For moar private "happy new year" see here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Please help me in draft page
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi. My request on the article Draft:Asif Tariq was declined because of lack of sources. Unfortunately this is very difficult to find many sources. I did my best. Hope in your help. Majid Saleem78 (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please and please help me out. I had worked hard on this Article. I really need your help. Majid Saleem78 (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. My request on the article Draft:Asif Tariq was declined by you, please i apologise if i had made some bad edits. At this stage it is very difficult to find many sources but i will try my best to make this article stronger in future. I did my best. Please help me. Majid Saleem78 (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Majid Saleem78, Please see User talk:Hatchens#Please review my draft for my detailed reply. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sir i had written everything according to references given. I apologise if i had written anything bad. I edit the page again please help me many of my references got deleted also. Majid Saleem78 (talk) 06:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Asalam'u'Alykum! Sir i request you please review my draft many of my references got deleted also. I had made some changes recently i request you once more please look at the said matter. Majid Saleem78 (talk) 14:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sir i had written everything according to references given. I apologise if i had written anything bad. I edit the page again please help me many of my references got deleted also. Majid Saleem78 (talk) 06:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Majid Saleem78, Please see User talk:Hatchens#Please review my draft for my detailed reply. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. My request on the article Draft:Asif Tariq was declined by you, please i apologise if i had made some bad edits. At this stage it is very difficult to find many sources but i will try my best to make this article stronger in future. I did my best. Please help me. Majid Saleem78 (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Detective's Barnstar
Anti-Sock Sleuth Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your great contributions to Wikipedia. Your efforts are making this a better encyclopedia. Best wishes, // Timothy :: talk 02:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
- @TimothyBlue:, thanks my friend. I do wonders but when I'm free. ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Please review my draft
Please review my Draft:Noor Mohammad Shah As it was declined. Rasik Salam Shah (talk) 06:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for your kind support. Hatchens (talk) 12:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
What is missing in the article?
hello bro what is missing in the article? i have made all the corrections, you deleted it but pls tell me the reason so that i can improve the same. Draft:Zeyan_Shafiq
also i texted you on instagram for the same you didnt reply so i tried to move it to mainspace. pls help out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hums4r (talk • contribs) 06:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hums4r, The draft needs to be submitted through our normal AfC procedure, where its content would be reviewed by AfC volunteers before moving it to mainspace. Please feel free in submitting the article through AfC. And a side note, I do not take any one's social media texts into consideration, no matter who they are; Wikipedia is not a soapbox. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- I would also take a note that you are abusing multiple accounts, you did not move the article to mainspace, it was rather Zeyan who did it. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, interesting. I hadn't noticed user "Zeyan". Anyway, Hums4r has sent this or a similar message to several people (I'm one). Feel free to comment here at the Teahouse. -- Hoary (talk) 08:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- I would also take a note that you are abusing multiple accounts, you did not move the article to mainspace, it was rather Zeyan who did it. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thanks for letting me know about afc process.
Hello, thanks for letting me know about AfC process, i have done the same, and yes i happen to know him, but this is not a COI, I have gone through all the articles myself. this is the only reason i want to do article on him, also i am planning to do article mainly on notable kashmiri people. i think people should know about him(He has been very notable in news in 2017 and now with his new startup 'Stalwart Esports' he's making it to news again and thats why i wanted to do it on him,my formatting might be wrong but i am learning it all) and other kashmiri's as well since everyone looks up for information on wikipedia only. i am new to wikipedia and still learning on how to make edits, i was unable to move the article to mainspace and i googled about it and it showed me that you need an old account to move it, so i asked Zeyan if he has an old account and if he can move it, since i didnt know about AfC process, i admit my mistake and apologise for it, i have submitted it through AfC. i'll make sure this doesnt get repeated, and my reason for asking multiple users about the draft was to ask them to review it if there are any mistakes in the article. Thanks for letting me know. The reason i am posting this message here as well is to let you know about my response, i dont know if you will get any notification of my response at teahouse question. Also sir, Mr Hoary asked me this question and i cant really figure out how do i tag him here so that he gets to know my response, kindly help out with it, i have posted my response to his talk page as well and teahouse as well. and i have updated the sources for the pictures as well,kindly check. I am sorry for the earlier incorrect source.
Link:- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zeyan_Shafiq Hums4r (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Brother, updated Draft:Zeyan Shafiq page.
Hi Brother, I Have worked on the writing format, have included everything briefly by researching again more, also added more info about stalwart esports and kashbook and a book written on him by Ravi Agrawal. kindly check it once again and see if it is correct now, and if it is not correct still, please help me bro with the article. and i want to start another article on Athar Aamir Khan( IAS Officer from kashmir), can you help me with it.
Hums4r (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
I have added citations to my article now.
Dear Sir, I assumed that the reason, you proposed my article to be deleted was the lack of citations. I have added several of them and I will add more. I assure that my article is completely legit and truthful. The topic is Sandeepani Vidya Nikethan - a school in Thrissur, Kerala. I've added the citation showing this particular school in a list given by the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations. Please approve my article and tell me if anything else is wrong.
Regards,
Sreehari A Menon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreehariarunmenon (talk • contribs) 05:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Zeyan Shafiq
Hello! Your submission of Zeyan Shafiq at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Regarding Draft:Souhardya De
Dear sir, A reviewer named Praxidacae has blatantly rejected my submission to Wikipedia without even mentioning a proper reason. Someone also added ‘Bruh xdddd’ to it. Can you please help me in this regard cause I feel that the subject is notable indeed, having won the highest civilian honour in India for minors. Please note. Thanks, Nikita Manzi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikita Manzi (talk • contribs) 03:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Message on Maktab (education)
I have left a message on my talk page to your concerns about maktab werldwayd (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Kafilur Rahman Nishat Usmani
Salam Aafi,
Good work on creating the article Kafilur Rahman Nishat Usmani. It is well sourced and neutral. However, I noticed that the other article you linked in the DYK has WP:NPOV issues and I've started a discussion on that at Talk:Fatawa_'Alamgiri#UNDUE.VR talk 07:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Kafilur Rahman Nishat Usmani
On 31 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kafilur Rahman Nishat Usmani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kafilur Rahman Nishat Usmani translated the Islamic law book Fatawa 'Alamgiri from Arabic into Urdu? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kafilur Rahman Nishat Usmani. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kafilur Rahman Nishat Usmani), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Abu Salman Shahjahanpuri
On 4 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Abu Salman Shahjahanpuri, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 05:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Apology
Assalamu alaikum bhai,
I am sorry for my somewhat aggressive edit summary here; it's late at night where I am, so I'm not thinking over my words perfectly, and I've also sort of become used to writing snappy summaries, so I didn't really keep in mind that doing so here would be disrespectful to you. Please accept my sincere apologies. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 08:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- M Imtiaz, wa alykumus salām. I read the WP:INDICSCRIPT again, and found that it was predominantly about India related article, but stopped reversing the action to learn something new. Thanks for the supplement and thanks for the help at my new DYK nomination. Have a good sleep. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Meticulous work Hatchens (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC) |
Heyo! I'm looking to be adopted!
Hi. So a quick 5 second run down of who I am: My name is Tucker Gladden and I've been really editing for about 1 year, but I still don't know everything and want an experienced editor such as yourself to help me. I've seen you around on ITN and think you are a really good editor. Please adopt me. Thanks! Tucker Gladden 👑 21:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- My friend TuckerGladden. I'll be completely back after 11 February 2021 since I'm having exams at the University, and the last two are left, one dates in today morning and the next on 11 February. If you can wait until then them I'm fine to take you in. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Zeyan Shafiq
On 9 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zeyan Shafiq, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Zeyan Shafiq developed KashBook during an Internet ban in the Kashmir Valley, operating without a virtual private network? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zeyan Shafiq. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Amakuru, oh wow. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 02:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Dhiya Ur-Rahman Azmi
Assalaamu-alaikum brother. You reverted 2 of my changes that I made to Dr Azami's page, namely the youtube references I added to show that:
1) Dr Azami's life was in danger after he converted to Islam 2) That Abu Ammar Yasir Qadhi was his student.
The reason you gave was for reverting my references is that youtube is not a reliable source of information. I disagree with you on this occasion. The clip I referenced was an interview of Dr Azami by Yasir Qadhi in which YQ states clearly on two occasions that he was a student of Dr Azami's and Dr Azami acknowledges this. Dr Azami also mentions during the interview that his life was in danger after he converted to Islam and that he had to leave his own village and make his way South.
I would appreciate it if you would kindly allow the citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.242.189 (talk) 22:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- 95.148.242.189, YouTube is not a reliable source to be cited on Wikipedia, and the other things are WP:UNDUE. We don't cover everything on Wikipedia. You can cite any independent reliable source that says the same and add content that follows the neutral content policy of Wikipedia. ─ The Aafī (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
I disagree since the self published clip is about Dr Azmi himself, I think it is permissable. Please see the wikipedia rticle on self published sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sourcdes.
I will include the relevant section for you here:
"...Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as:
the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim; it does not involve claims about third parties; it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source; there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and the article is not based primarily on such sources."Italic text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.242.189 (talk) 20:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia Library JSTOR access
I saw your proposal for Wikipedia Library JSTOR access. It's already available! See: https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/partners/ —Flicky1984 (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Flicky1984: I know we have access to JSTOR through TWL but that is limited to journals only. I had included a book link which I needed badly to access. I came up to the link via Facebook Group Wikipedia Weekly where Alex mentioned it to me. Anyways thank you. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 16:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Dr Mohammed Ziauddin Ahmed Shakeb
Dear TheAafi
In reference to your query about verification of "Dr Mohammed Ziauddin Ahmed Shakeb" if you scroll down on the source "ACADEMIA" in the Editor's note there is a section "about the author" which I have widely referenced. I will try and reference more articles where Zia Shakeb is discussed significantly and submit again later
Thank you for your guidance and help, much appreciated
Tamafao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamafao (talk • contribs) 09:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Tamafao, The source fails because it is not independent. Please see WP:42 for a short understanding to know what you need for the draft to be accepted. ─ The Aafī (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear TheAafi,
Many thanks for your reply and advice - it is much appreciated. I have added several references, and redrafted it so all sentences can be referenced back to credible references.
Kindly please review
Thanks again
Tamafao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamafao (talk • contribs) 20:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear TheAafi,
I have added further references to the article - kindly please review and advise on the next steps to progress the article to publication.
Thanks,
Tamafao
Why you declined the Egyptian actor Draft:Ali Mansour (Actor) ?
Draft:Ali Mansour (Actor) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.200.135.246 (talk) 14:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- 156.200.135.246, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ali Mansour AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Pasbaan-e-adab Promoting Urdu
Will highly appreciate your review and support for submission of this article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pasbaan-e-adab
Based on the previous review, the articles of press release has been removed from Reference list. All the reference articles are from authentic sources and major publications. ─ Umair (talk) 20:23, 1 feb 2021 (UTC)
Muslims in Indian independence movement
Do you know if there is currently an article on the role of Muslims in the Indian independence movement? If not, would you consider it a notable topic? There seems to have been a lot of efforts by both ulema and other Muslims in the struggle against colonialism.VR talk 01:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Vice regent, Not just an article, I've multitudes of books on this topic available in library, written by both Muslims and Non-Muslims. This topic is worth notable according to me. Please let me know if I can help anyway? ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Follow Wikipedia Criteria
The article Zeyan Shafiq isn't notable at all. Why did you removed the tag? HACKER KASH (talk) 13:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- HACKER KASH, Tags are not bombarded. The article is currently subject to AfD, and that AfD would determine its future. A subject doesn't become non-notable because a single person thinks so. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The article is all about Sockpuppetry. Initially the was created by User:Hums4r and after that you took the command and even only you are defending the Article where is the main creator? HACKER KASH (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- HACKER KASH, Being an WP:AfC and WP:NPP volunteer on the Wikipedia, and a regular WP:AfD participant, I feel good contributing to the encyclopedia in the ways that interest me. Why is that a problem to you? Sockpuppetry has venue at WP:SPI. Please refer there. No one on the Wikipedia takes any command, anyone is free to contribute as they get time. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Nice one User:TheAafi going good. HACKER KASH (talk) 13:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- HACKER KASH Hi, i am the main creator to the page, if there's anything you would like to ask you have to post it on my talk page not on some other contributors talk page.
Moreover there has been so many disruptive editing to Zeyan Shafiq in the past few days, from multiple different new accounts and you are one.TheAafi, i feel like this is related to (Sheikh Asif), (Sardar Nadir Ali), (Thames Infotech), (Imtiyaaz Rasool). They're targeting the articles that i have worked on because i have been reporting them. But anyways I won't stop, I'm sure this is someone related to them. Will talk to admins for the same. Hums4r (Let's Talk) 14:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
User:Hums4r if you feel so go i will help you to report them. The Wikipedia is free to edit and anyone can edit it or create article for anyone. HACKER KASH (talk) 14:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
But this for sure a Sockpuppetry case how do you know that there was discussion going on here? HACKER KASH (talk) 14:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
You literally tagged me bro, are you okay? Just wanted to let you know that refrain from disruptive edits on wikipedia if you want to continue editing. Hums4r (Let's Talk) 14:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Shah Akbar Danapuri
Dear TheAafi, I noticed some of your edits on Draft:Shah Akbar Danapuri, and I would really appreciate your help in getting this published. Please consider. Raiyan Syed (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Abu Salman Shahjahanpuri
On 20 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abu Salman Shahjahanpuri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 50 books from a total of over 150 books authored by Pakistani historian Abu Salman Shahjahanpuri are about the Indian scholar and independence activist Abul Kalam Azad? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abu Salman Shahjahanpuri. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abu Salman Shahjahanpuri), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
You are a brilliant editor. Hatchens (talk) 05:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC) |
Thank you ...
... for improving articles in February! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Draft Karina Flores
Hi User:AafiOnMobile, I analyzed the draft again, and the only part that could lead to a misunderstanding regarding the neutrality is: "Her voice is feminine with a dark timbre, brought by dynamic music accent to highlight opera singing's tragic nature." This is a technical evaluation of Opera singers voice instrument in this case her voice technically has a "Dynamic Accent", e.g.:
- A dynamic accent or stress accent is an emphasis using louder sound or a stronger sound, typically most pronounced on the attack of the sound.
- A tonic accent is an emphasis on notes by virtue of being higher in pitch as opposed to higher in volume.
- An agogic accent is an emphasis by virtue of being longer in duration.
Please let me know if this explaination can solve the issue. Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear TheAafi, could you help me to understand if the draft can be approved after my explanation, if not, could you highlight any specific point to amend, please? Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- LovingOperaForever, - I'm having exams and I'd request you to be patient. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear TheAafi, I truly know what it means to have exams, and I wish you have astonishing results, I also passed this step at the university, and I know the pressure. Still, exams will never finish in our life, so please dedicate 5 minutes of your time to review it, so then I can publish this article which is my first one. Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 09:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear TheAafi, do you have any updates for me, please? Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- LovingOperaForever, no updates from our end. You have resubmitted the article for review. Sooner or later a reviewer will take a look at it. Have patience. - Hatchens (talk) 04:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Draft Karina Flores
Dear User:AafiOnMobile,
I have seen you replied to other people, and after 12 days, I don't understand why you are not commenting on what, in your opinion, I should change. In contrast, the aspect you were mentioning was already reviewed by Hatchens and Theroadislong and fixed accordingly. As you know better than me, I cannot re-submit the draft without any changes.
I submit to your attention my previous consideration:
I analyzed the draft again, and the only part that could lead to a misunderstanding regarding the neutrality is: "Her voice is feminine with a dark timbre, brought by dynamic music accent to highlight opera singing's tragic nature." This is a technical evaluation of Opera singers voice instrument; in this case, her voice technically has a "Dynamic Accent", e.g.:
- A dynamic accent or stress accent is an emphasis using louder sound or a stronger sound, typically most pronounced on the attack of the sound.
- A tonic accent is an emphasis on notes by virtue of being higher in pitch as opposed to higher in volume.
- An agogic accent is an emphasis by virtue of being longer in duration.
Please let me know if this explanation can solve the issue. Kind regards, LovingOperaForever ([[User talk:LovingOperaForever|talk]]) 17:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Dear TheAafi, thanks for helping to review the draft, I re-submitted the draft for your final approval. Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 14:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- LovingOperaForever, I had a look today at your draft, and tried fixing wikilinks but there are so many. A specific article may be wikilinked once, and the rest would be "excessive wikilinking". Fix that please. I'd try to help if I can but I feel I won't be able to do so. Leaving it for my friend Hatchens. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks!!! I will fix it immediately. Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear Hatchens and The Aafī, I fixed the "excessive wikilinking", could you approve it now, please? Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear Hatchens and The Aafī, I hope you had a fantastic weekend; I would like to ask if it is possible to approve the draft this week, please? Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 10:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Vipin Kumar Tripathi for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vipin Kumar Tripathi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
-- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 13:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Note:- I accidentally missed out checking the last nomination for this, my bad. i've withdrawn the nomination. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 14:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Jammumylove, Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Daihatsu Rocky edits
Hello! In the future, please provide a better explanation as to why you are removing large chunks of an article as you did with Daihatsu Rocky I have reverted these edits to the previous revision. If you think this is a mistake, please tell me on my talk page. Thanks! Sagquattro2009 (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry my bad. But this is not an edit war. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 20:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Ashok Kumar Pandey for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashok Kumar Pandey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
-- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 20:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
COI
Hi There. While i was looking over an article which you created Ashok Kumar Pandey Which i later nominated for deletion, i checked the twitter link there and surprisingly found some conversation with you on twitter on your handle which has a link to your wikipedia user page, a small search string gave out all the conversations you had with the article's subject and it's clearly evident that you've had plenty of conversations and since you've created this article + edited it majorly time to time, You haven't declared the COI, I'd request you to do so. Also later i went through your articles created and there are plenty of them who fail GNG, i'd be nominating them for deletion, kindly don't take this as a PA. because surprisingly they weren't created via AfC. Anyways, Please declare the COI for Ashok Kumar Pandey. Thanks -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 13:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Jammumylove, Thanks for this; but may I know "what plenty of articles" you mean? I'd surely be helpful. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Upasana RC (Has been earlier nominated for deletion and was deleted, the sources sound very promotional, have a look at them.)
- Vasundhara Sirnate source's are mostly primary(twitter or profiles).
- Ela Mishra My BEFORE gave me no results.
- As for now these, on a side note i appreciate your work towards the islamic scholars. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 14:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Jammumylove, well Vasundhara on a side tends to meet NAUTHOR (despite failing GNG), I'm still trying to find more sources about all articles that I've written, so I'd leave it there for a while, you've nominated Ela Mishra's already for deletion, and I feel Upasana meets the NACTOR guideline. Thank you. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Anyways, have you seen User:TheAafi/COI?. AfC is for users who are quite new. I'd also appreciate that if you ever feel that any of my articles has a defect, try to ping me right here, instead of directly jumping to AfDing. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- TheAafi, Yes appreciate the declaration, Will surely do if i feel any article you created needs improvement. Nice talking to you bud. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 14:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Anyways, have you seen User:TheAafi/COI?. AfC is for users who are quite new. I'd also appreciate that if you ever feel that any of my articles has a defect, try to ping me right here, instead of directly jumping to AfDing. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Jammumylove, well Vasundhara on a side tends to meet NAUTHOR (despite failing GNG), I'm still trying to find more sources about all articles that I've written, so I'd leave it there for a while, you've nominated Ela Mishra's already for deletion, and I feel Upasana meets the NACTOR guideline. Thank you. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Upasana RC (Has been earlier nominated for deletion and was deleted, the sources sound very promotional, have a look at them.)
Zeyan Shafiq
I have made a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Draft:Zeyan Shafiq.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Toddy1: I've also tagged the draft with CSD & salt, and idk why these sockfarms are trying to discredit my works lol ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 10:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- They are not here to build an encyclopaedia. To them it is a game, like Diplomacy (game), and you are an opponent who needs to be defeated.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Toddy1 Lol. They're best at creating accounts with harassing usernames as well despite accusing me at different venues. I feel outraged sometimes, and irritated sometimes. Thanks to Cyphoidbomb who watches my talk page and does his work on time. I am mostly off on my main account because of electricity cut-off, and I think to rest for few days (turning off from the mobile account as well); I really feel irritated. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- They are not here to build an encyclopaedia. To them it is a game, like Diplomacy (game), and you are an opponent who needs to be defeated.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Ela Mishra for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ela Mishra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
-- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 13:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Belated apology for being rude.
Hello Aafi. I wanted to say that at the SPI Investigation, I might have been rude to you because i didn't know the reason and the attacks that you were facing. I read (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheAafi&diff=prev&oldid=1010666048) this the same day and i wanted to wait for the SPI Investigation to give out results so that you'd be assured that i don't belong to any of the sock farms that have been trying to harass you. The attacks going on you by all these accounts are really sad, and i'd like to apologise for being rude to you on the investigation page. Back then i didn't know about the issues you were facing but later i read all the investigation comments and found out that there's a big campaign going on against you. You did point out correct points like Same interest around Stalwart Esports and Zeyan Shafiq , but i've already posted the reason for that on my user page. Even though i did not try to create or edit any article related to Zeyan Shafiq or Stalwart Esports because i wanted to completely read all the policies before hand. Accept my sincere apologies for talking rudely and i really hope you're in a good mental state now. If you have any questions, certainly feel free to ask me. Warm Regards. Abhayesports (talk) 05:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
I'd recommend you to take a wikibreak and try to stay calm even if they harass you. Don't pay attention to them and keep your good work up when you are back! With love from –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 08:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC) |
Adoption
Hello! I am aviawilliam! I would love to be your student. I am really interested in Aviation mainly american and middle eastern airlines.
AviaWilliamEdits (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- That's good AviaWilliamEdits. Please see User:TheAafi/Adoption/Adoption page and follow it. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Draft Karina Flores
Dear Hatchens and The Aafī, I hope you had a fantastic weekend; unfortunately, no one is picking it up the draft, so I would be delighted if you can approve it whereas you worked on it and your last positive review should lead to the publishing of the draft as the final step of the process. Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 09:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Hatchens and The Aafī, still no one is picking it up, any help would be really appreciated. Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 10:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Hatchens and The Aafī, >]], can you reply or it is not allowed by wikipedia? I don't know the process yet, as I am new here, but if you can answer why you cannot approve it, I will appreciate it. Thanks! Kind regards, LovingOperaForever (talk) 21:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- LovingOperaForever, we both have reviewed it once. So, I would not like to dwell on it further. I can see, a submission/review tag has been added. Keep patience because "This may take 4 months or more since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 5,028 pending submissions waiting for review." I wish you all the best. - Hatchens (talk) 04:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- @LovingOperaForever:, As my friend Hatchens indicated above, it is best for you to wait for any other AfC volunteer to review your draft. I'm not personally feeling fine in reviewing it further. You may find any related reviewer at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/List of reviewers by subject who might be interested in reviewing such articles. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks The Aafī for your suggestion. I am a little sad because you promised to approve it once I finished amending it as per your review. Kind regards,LovingOperaForever (talk) 21:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Institute for Social Ecology
Thank you for the close. I previously closed it as keep but one of the participants asked for it to be reopened. --Enos733 (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Enos733, I didn't notice that. I read the discussion thoroughly and felt that "keep" is the best outcome. If anyone still wants to re-open it, I'll consider it (then). I didn't find the canvassing-related comments fine either lol. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, I think your close was 100% correct. --Enos733 (talk) 16:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
A little help
Hi Aafi, someone left this on my talk page. I’m not sure what to make of this. Do you have any idea how to handle this??defcon5 (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- DEFCON5, There exist people who don't know anything but to irritate others. That account has been blocked and I've removed their message from your talk page. Regards ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- hey thanks bro.defcon5 (talk) 18:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
On Mowlana Saad
Salam Afi, You have reverted my changes to Mowlana Saad’s page but did not give a reason. Don’t you agree the current narrative is one-sided? Please consider or explain your stance. Thanks Aaa975 114.72.66.90 (talk) 09:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Aaa975, Wa alykumus salām, See again what you added, a bulk of things that do not match the Wikipedia's style, and that contain original research (prohibited on the Wikipedia), and more than that, something that advocates for Kandhlawi. Wikipedia is not someone's "advocate" but your additions like
With the majority of the criticisms against Saad Kandhlawi answered from Islamic sources, it seems that the opposition to his leadership is mostly a concerted effort to wrestle the control of the large followers of the Tablighi Jamat through political maneuvering. This approach is a hotly debated issue, however, Saad Kandhlawi has refrained from attacking his opponents so far, asking them to treat all scholars with respect, even those who are opposed to his leadership
fail our standards of neutrality, besides failing the verification requirements. The current version is supported by sources and is neutral. Thank you! ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Archived comment
You archieved the comment at the SPI just because i confronted you, anyways just to let here to let you know that i will still nominate any article that isn’t suitable to be on the wikipedia for deletion whether it’s created by you or any of your ally. You can certainly go on and file as many SPI’s as you can. Clearly depicts you’re afraid of getting exposed, just like what i did earlier to you by exposing your COI which you never mentioned till that date and even you removed it after the article was deleted. Also You were the one who started the “Newness” thing by mentioning that “ A person brand-new, and this much expertise”. Are you jealous if someone has more expertise then you? This is not a P.A, just posting here because you removed my comment there.-- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK
- Jammumylove The investigation was closed days ago without any action by TheSandDoctor, and you added the comment in archive which is not appropriate. Calm down. Suspicion doesn't mean that a person hates another editor. The abusefilter marked your edits as "persistent sockpuppetry" and that's not my problem. I did what I was supposed to per the Wikipedia policies. New editors with a lot of knowledge of the Wikipedia areas are often found to be abusing multiple accounts because a new user normally doesn't know much about Wikipedia. ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Since the SPI was closed with no action, my suspicion is gone similarly. Contribute to the encyclopedia and help it grow further. Best. ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- TheAafi, you didn't inform me, neither tag me how would i come to know about it? please share the abusefilter log which marked so. and what if i do the same for you? if i tag you as sockpuppet won't you get angry? won't you feel as if i hate you? I got pissed because i thought we all are here in good faith and i thought you had no issues with your article's that were nom for AfD. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 17:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Jammumylove, Accounts suspected of multiple accounts aren't normally informed. I don't understand how did you come to know about it. To reply your statement, '
if i tag you as sockpuppet won't you get angry? won't you feel as if i hate you?
" - this is why the users aren't informed. I didn't "tag you". It is a CU who tags such, or an admin. Calm down. A wrong SPI is deleted as vandalism, as was this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheAafi. I had no issues with you AFDing the articles, and we mustn't have. There are numerous other reasons. Anyways, best luck! ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Jammumylove, Accounts suspected of multiple accounts aren't normally informed. I don't understand how did you come to know about it. To reply your statement, '
- TheAafi, you didn't inform me, neither tag me how would i come to know about it? please share the abusefilter log which marked so. and what if i do the same for you? if i tag you as sockpuppet won't you get angry? won't you feel as if i hate you? I got pissed because i thought we all are here in good faith and i thought you had no issues with your article's that were nom for AfD. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 17:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Since the SPI was closed with no action, my suspicion is gone similarly. Contribute to the encyclopedia and help it grow further. Best. ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Usmani family of Deoband
On 18 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Usmani family of Deoband, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that four members of the Usmani family were co-founders of the Darul Uloom Deoband seminary, where the Deobandi movement began? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Usmani family of Deoband. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Usmani family of Deoband), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Congratulations for your first DYK and good luck for the next one. --Gazal world (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Gazal world, Thanks for the compliment. But this is the 4th DYK, though the first one nominated. See User:TheAafi/DYKs. ☺️☺️ ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 15:14, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for improving articles in March! On Bach's birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Struck anything ?
Hey, have a look at this user. [1]. I hope might have already got it. Anyway just wanted to let you know. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 07:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kashmorwiki, I noticed them recreating the Zeyan Shafiq article. Looks like a sock account of Hums4r. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thats what I was saying. This user had manipulated me in the past. It seems this guy is not gonna stop from recreating this article. Is there any special methods to deal this other than reporting at SPI or ANI? Kichu🐘 Need any help? 07:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kashmorwiki, no idea but I think Praxidicae might have some. She is a great editor from whom no vandal has escaped. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 07:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thats what I was saying. This user had manipulated me in the past. It seems this guy is not gonna stop from recreating this article. Is there any special methods to deal this other than reporting at SPI or ANI? Kichu🐘 Need any help? 07:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Amazing achievements on Wikipedia since you started editing in 2019. Possible only when one has a sense of purpose and direction, such energy and drive at young age. And along with college studies plus corona pandemic to deal with. Wish you the best in future. Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC) |
- Ngrewal1 Jazakallah khair. I feel honored. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Your comment on this discussion.
Hey, Hope you are well. There is a discussion going on at WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir. Your comment will be appreciated. Check out here. Thankyou Iflaq (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you
You're specially invited to join the WikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.
The collaboration will help promote many articles to the good and featured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see the main page of the collaboration.
Sign up for this collaboration by listing your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.
You can discuss this newsletter here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.Sent by Hulged ⟨talk⟩ on behalf of WikiProject India. Thank you!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Cross-Project Assistance Requested
Hello, I'm an user from English Wikisource currently dealing with s:Index:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf, and the OCR plugin provided on English Wikisource struggles to identify some Arabic characters (and may have misidentified some others), which affects the following pages:
- s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/108
- s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/109
- s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/110
- s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/111
- s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/112
- s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/113
As an active user on WikiProject Islam, I hope you can help with the transcription of these two pages by inserting missing Arabic characters. Missing characters are marked properly by "Arabic characters" templates, and can be done by replacing them with the corresponding Arabic characters.
I'll appreciate your useful assistance, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 11:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- 廣九直通車, I'll surely assist in this. Thanks. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 11:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 12:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- 廣九直通車, I've updated the remaining things. Please lemme know if you need my help again. Thanks ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks for taking time helping with these pages!廣九直通車 (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- 廣九直通車, I've updated the remaining things. Please lemme know if you need my help again. Thanks ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 12:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Urdu Wikipedia
Hello TheAafi, having noticed this message, I wondered if you were aware of this? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lotje, Yes I'm aware of this & this message was forwarded to the list [available on a subpage of my userpage on the Urdu Wikipedia]. We've a "Wikibān" feature on Urdu Wikipedia which helps us to partially help in administrative tasks. Since I serve the Urdu Wikipedia as an ambassador & a key-member of Dehalvi Wikimedia Group that promotes it, I've made this request few moments back. Thank you! ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yhank you for your quick response. Is there something that needs to be done? Don't hink so, cause Urdu is not a language I speak. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Unfair behaviour happening with me.. Thank you.
- Assalamu alaikum bhai, I hope all is well إن شاء الله. I just figured I should notify you that the sockfarm has posted yet another thread about you at ANI. Best, M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 21:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- How did you Figure out? Can you explain? Also I've had no issues with This user and my post wasn't for him, it was for few other people.Warm Regards---Abhay EsportsTalk To Me 21:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you ...
wild garlic |
---|
... for improving articles in April! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
What was the logic behind relisting this? There was no opposition and had 3 well reasoned delete votes. TAXIDICAE💰 12:31, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Jamia Tur Rasheed, Karachi
Thank you for finding the extra Urdu sources for the article, in my view at least, there is more than adequate sourcing now for the purposes of the AfD. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 02:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Goldsztajn, Thanks. I believe there would be plethora of coverage in offline sources as well. But whatever has been added seems enough to me as well, like the 5 pages in UoK journal. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)