User talk:OrangUtanUK

Hi.

You have to create a page at fairey rodentine for it to be useful. Create that page first and then put links into it. Hang on a minute, I'll give you the standard user greeting. Dunc_Harris|☺ 11:13, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Hello Orang, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. If you need editing help, visit Wikipedia:How to edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Dunc_Harris|☺ 11:17, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

PS you can do editing experiments at Wikipedia:sandbox or create your own sandbox at User:OrangUtanUK/sandbox Dunc_Harris|☺ 11:17, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Flettner-184.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I copied the discussion from Talk:List of famous Swiss people onto Talk:Swiss inventions -- list of famous Swiss people was just a Wikipedia:Redirect page and hardly anyone would see the discussion. I hope you don't mind. - Motor (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've reverted your edit on the overweight people in Harry Potter; please see the talk page for more details. If you wish the article to include something about the overweight, what you write needs to be verifiable. Also, please read Help:Minor edit to know which edits should be marked as "minor" - this one quite definitely shouldn't. Cheers, Pruneau 16:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, OrangUtanUK.

I see that you changed "aircraft" to "airplane" in this article. Please be aware that this used to be an ongoing issue between British and American English (British usage is "aeroplane"), until a happy compromise was made by using the word "aircraft". This word exists in both languages. If I changed all the words to "aeroplane" then that would irritate American readers: similarly, if you change them to "airplane" then that irritates British readers. Let's try to be neutral, by using a word which exists happily on both sides of the Atlantic. That word is "aircraft". Please see the Wikipedia policy: "Where varieties of English differ over a certain word or phrase, try to find an alternative that is common to both." Thanks :) EuroSong ^talk 15:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page, so the discussion does not get split across two pages. EuroSong ^talk 15:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is usual on Wikipedia to delete articles that don't contain any content. This has the benefit that readers can easily see that an article doesn't exist from the red links to it, and if they know about it they may be more likely to add content themselves. Also see Wikipedia:Stub, where a stub is described as "an article that is too short to be genuinely useful, but not so short as to be useless"

If you were planning to work on the article yourself later then sorry for deleting it. Feel free to recreate it with more content. You might want to add the template {{Underconstruction}} whilst you are working on it. Alternatively you could create the article in a subpage of your user space e.g. User:OrangUtanUK/Muggle Protection Act whilst you work on it, and then move it once you are happy to Muggle Protection Act.

Any more problems just drop me a line. the wub "?!" 16:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Imperial Reference Dictionary, ca. 1950, "propellor" and "propeller" are both correct. OrangUtanUK 10:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've taken that off my list now. Cheers, CmdrObot 14:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I did that is because it is a standars AWB guideline, and wikitext is supposed to be easy. Imagine if people see weird &abcd; everywhere, some people don't know what that is. If it is not on your keyboars, you can copy it from another place, or you you can just write the &abcd; and wait for another person using awb to unicodeify it.

GeorgeMoney (talk) 18:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've been keeping an eye on the Discworld humour explained article and am a little concerned that before long it will be nominated for deletion, mostly on the grounds that it is unsourced and on the surface appears to be cruft. If you have some sources for the contributions you have made, please cite them in the article - for help on doing so see Wikipedia:Citing sources or ask for help on the article's discussion page, or my talk page. Cheers! QmunkE 20:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems adverty since it doesn't explain how it is different than any other train signaling and controlling technology/ manufacturers, nor does it explain its notability in relation to the industry (i.e., is it the largest manufacturer of signaling technology? the oldest? why or how is it different than its competitors?) Just my two cents. Cornell Rockey 16:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! sorry for my like this belate answer, I come not frequently on en:wiki. I hope that now my graphic Image:ViscountE.jpg is correct? When Yoy find any mistake on my heraldry images, please, wrote me, but better on my pl:wiki page. Sorry for my owfull english too :( When You had experience in heraldy tell me please, why on en:wiki by articles about noble families and peerages are not coats of arms? Its custom, overlooking or legal restriction?

Thanks for yours help --Steifer 01:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the link about Lehman biography is uncorrect.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Clifton MaCabe Murray article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Clicketyclack 18:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Clifton Murray, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Clifton Murray is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Clifton Murray, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 03:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 150.237.47.38 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Nishkid64 (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find the autoblock, so it must have been removed by another administrator. Nishkid64 (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swiss inventions. Since you had some involvement with the Swiss inventions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ╟─TreasuryTag►directorate─╢ 13:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]