User talk:NuclearWizard/Archives/1

This archive is from 2015 to 2016.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nukiafinal.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vatnik (slang), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VK. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add speculation that Yanokovic removal from power damaged Ukraine's economy. Speculation has no place on Wikipedia. Besides there is also speculation that his presidency was damaging Ukraine's economy. That is also speculative information that doesn't belong on Wikipedia. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Case in point: in a March 2014 an Ukraine’s economy analysis in The Economist they do mention speculative information that $37 billion had gone missing during Viktor Yanukovych’s rule, but it does not talk about Yanokovic removal from power damaging Ukraine's economy (it does made clear that Yanukovych’s Azarov Government weakened the state’s finances). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe any issue with national stability contributes to this sort of thing, especially considering the war in Donbass and annexation of Crimea. Note that Economist article you just linked even says "The economic turmoil reflects recent political instability.", which given the timing (5 March 2014) implies that it is probably referring to the change in government. It also mentions neither Crimea nor Donbass, and does not tie Russia to the then-current situation in Ukraine. Nuke (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pavel Durov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, NuclearWizard. I've moved the South Ossetia discussion from my talk page to the Donetsk People's Republic talk page as I think it should be discussed there rather than my talk page. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His rank was anything but too low. I have now added half a dozen sources (including DoD/Pentagon) confirming his significance in and to ISIL as war minister or minister of war, which is basically a defence minister (which is a term a few of the sources also use). However, for the sake of compromise, I will put war minister, instead of defence. PS The designation wasn't given by News24, but by a US official quoted by News24 (also quoted by the Guardian). In any case, the Petagon has also called him their Minister of War. EkoGraf (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the mistake. I don't have any problem with his inclusion based on your sources. Thanks for correcting my mistake. Nuke (talk) 18:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem mate. :) EkoGraf (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Party (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interventionism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edits [1], [2], you might be interested in this RFC at Talk:Han_Chinese#RfC_on_inclusion_of_numbers_of_Chinese_people --Lemongirl942 (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the link! Nuke (talk) 21:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how long you've followed the discussion, but this has been up countless times, and the result has always been the same. Israel and Syria have been at war since 1948, and Israeli strikes relate to either this old conflict or to Israel's conflict with Hezbollah. It's convenient for the Assad regime to accuse the rebels of receiving Israeli aid, but rebel factions have made similar accusations towards the Assad regime. This type of rhetoric was also used in the first Libyan civil war, and is overall very common in the Arab world. Best, --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 13:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None of the information you provided is anything new. This has been up numerous times in the past. I encourage you to familiarize yourself with previous discussions before starting a new one. Best, --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 14:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't consider this while editing the infobox, but yes, I added a couple more reliable sources. There are already numerous pages on Wikipedia which show Israel as a belligerent in individual battles. In any case, I thought the consensus was that Israel shouldn't be included because they only rendered medical support for the opposition. However, looking at the page you linked, it seems that for a broad amount of reasons (probably "non-major combatant" most significantly), they dismissed it for a different reason. I apologize. Nuke (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The airstrikes are related to either Hezbollah, Syria's support for said organization, or crossborder stray fire. You have provided nothing new, and none of your sources make Israel a combatant in the Syrian civil war. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 14:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right. The attacks on Damascus, which is far from the combat near the Golan Heights, seem unrelated to all three, although it's convenient to associate air strikes on Damascus amidst a civil war where the rebels are backed by Israeli allies such as the United States with the terrorist group Hezbollah. However, it looks like this wasn't new in 2013, either. Nuke (talk) 15:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that Israel's conflict to Syria both predates and is unrelated to Syria's internal conflict. Listing Israel as a combatant in the Syrian civil war is like listing it in the Iran–Iraq War because of Operation Opera. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 15:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NuclearWizard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]