User talk:MickeyDonald

`== Welcome ==

Hi. When you recently edited The Three Stooges (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catholic League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MickeyDonald. I have again removed your comment in the Introduction to The Three Stooges (film). I feel that the issue of Anti-Catholicism is well covered under the heading of Reception. The reference provided is not from a recognised media source and is the view of one person/organisation. It therefore I believe clearly does not merit inclusion in the Introduction to the page.

Cfs198 (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian Picciolini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elaine Pagels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pagans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Three Stooges (film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the section I opened on Talk prior to your revert. Thanks. 11:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello MickeyDonald,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hatune Dogan for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you'd do that, or want to. We should expand the encyclopedia, not diminish it, right? There are articles in German and French, so I wanted to start the English one. Haven't had time to work on it. Please do not delete. MickeyDonald (talk) 18:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Valfontis. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sherman Skolnick, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Valfontis (talk) 23:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valfontis is being polite here. It is clear that you, MickeyDonald, are acting against consensus by repeatedly adding "anti-Catholic" to Sherman Skolnick against consensus and without any attempt to provide a reliable secondary source. If you continue to do so, I will seek administrative action. - Location (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for your edits in Sabina Guzzanti (i.e. diff, diff). In this case, it might be helpful for you to read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. - Location (talk) 14:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus? That's wrong, and you are incorrect. There is no "consensus". So, if you read thru the links on the page, in detail, it's obvious beyond doubt he was an anti-Catholic. Have you read the material? Please do so before commenting further. If you do not read the source material, I will therefore seek administrative action. Thank you.MickeyDonald (talk) 06:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MickeyDonald. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Three Stooges (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catholic League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MickeyDonald. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]