User talk:Meryam90

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

1

Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian Premier League/FA-GA June Hi there! We have organized FA-GA of the month. FA-GA means that we will collaborate and help any 1 article to get promoted to GA status in the next month, June. We have to decide that on which article will we work. So for that I'd love to invite you to share your opinion and express your vote at the page, FA-GA June. At the end of the contest, editors will be given awards by the co-ordinators. We will really like to have an editor like you for our first collaboration. So please do join us! Thanks and Happy editing! :)

Vice-coordinator of WP:IPL, →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 09:28, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that there is an important discussion currently at the talk page of the article Shahrukh Khan. Since you have been involved in a prior dispute related to this, your views are welcomed here. With (hopeful) consensus, we can initiate a neutrality-aimed change in the said article. Thank you. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never said he apologised to the MCA. I merely mentioned the apology. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No I know, what I wrote was merely an explanation to what I have added. No worries :D --Meryam90 (talk) 18:15, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

....over here. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Centenary_year. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They do? Really? Thanks a ton for that! :D. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 04:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please try to incorporate my following suggestions or corrections:

INTRO -he has won 15 filmfare awards not fouteen (third line)

ACTING CAREER -please use the range for years as 1988-92, 1993-1997, 1998-2003, 2004-2006, 2007-2010 because overlap is creating confusion.

-red chillies not red chillis and there is not even a single mention about the company under that heading 2004-2007.

STAGE PERFORMANCES -addition: now or never concert in 2002 december in durban, south africa featuring many actors like amitji duggu sanju pri etc http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Now+or+Never+Concert+srk&page=1

-correction: awesome foursome were akki-juhi-kajol-srk no salman no twinkle http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Awesome+Foursome+concert+srk

BRAND SRK -you can easily add 20 more popular brands of india to the list in that paragraph in 2 more lines like pepsodent etc.

IN THE MEDIA -mushtaq sheikh has written 1 more book in addition to still reading khan http://www.amazon.com/Shah-Rukh-Can-Shahrukh-bollywood/dp/8187108266

again please

Bubblelubble (talk) 08:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll look it them all :D --Meryam90 (talk) 12:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CRATER NAMED AFTER SRK

http://www.lunargeographic.org/srkhan/index.shtml

secondly, you still have not corrected fouteen to fifteen filmfare awards and many things i pointed. nevermind sorry i bothered a senior user like you.Bubblelubble (talk) 21:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on those stuff and I like when ppl suggest things to me as for the Filmfare awards, The 15th is the swiss award which was only honory, even Filmfare magazine states his tally of filmfare awards as 14 :/ --Meryam90 (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

so you mean an honory filmfare award is not a filmfare award? weird :/ well as you please. peace out. Bubblelubble (talk) 23:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Several sections are wrongly named in the Career sections of this guy's article. A header must summarize the entire section and give a topic understanding to the reader. Would you spare some time to discuss this on the article's talk page so that, they could be re-named appropriately? Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Meryam! Will you please help me work on Priyanka Chopra's article? According to the GA review: - Most references are either incomplete, dead or unreliable. - The early life section is too small and lacks sources. - There's no emphasis on her modelling career. Also, people keep changing the page structure. Need help with that as well. I'll be really grateful if you consider my request.

BTW, You're the best editor!! :D BYE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrSalvatore (talk • contribs) 23:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jai (2012 film). Since you had some involvement with the Jai (2012 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BollyJeff | talk 19:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Meryam90, and welcome to WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! I would like to thank you for joining the project, and I look forward to collaborating with you! We announce tasks and projects on the talk page of the project, and I encourage you to take part in the tasks. If you have any questions about the project, or anything, do not hesitate to ask me. Sofffie7 (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meryam! Thank you for improving April Kepner's page and again, welcome to the project. :-) Sofffie7 (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meryam90,

You have written in the SRK article comment that "it was agreed that a personal life section is not needed since he has been married before becoming an actor--all info are in early life & bg section". May I know who has agreed that with whom? There are many article including Barack Obama where there is not only the section "Personal life" but a seperate article Family of Barack Obama when he was not president of USA. Coolgama (talk) 08:52, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meryam90, Pls. check the earlier contribution done by me on this article Shahrukh Khan. I had added good amount of information with referecnes, and you said, this is too personal information. The wikipedia articles content addition is a coolaborative effort and the content of article gets added like this only. pls. check the 1st article written by Jimbo 10 years back and see the content in it and also check the status of the article today. I do not think, there is anything wrong in referring other articles.

Pls. give a way to add the content in the aricle and help to make the article complete. Coolgama (talk) 04:43, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Meryam90 (talk) 12:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK that someone has recently nominated this for GA? BollyJeff | talk 16:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message about improving the Calvin Harris article and i thought I've some free time today so why not. Was a bit of a mess I have to say. Cheers.--RyanTQuinn (talk) 13:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bounce - Synthpop, Dance-pop I Need Your Love - Synthpop, Dance-pop Let's Go - Progressive house, Dance-pop Drinking From The Bottle - Progressive house, Dance.pop Blame - Dance-pop Feel So Close - Dance-pop Outside - Dance-pop Sweet - Nothing - Dance-pop, House It Was You - Electro House Overdrive - Electro House Summer - Electro House, Dance-pop We Found Love - Electro, Dance-pop We'll Be Coming Back - Electro House, Dance-pop Under Control - Progressive house Open Wide - Electro house

If you're familiar with dance music, then you should know this just by listening to the songs — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrandonWLam (talk • contribs) 18:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

-- I am not telling you that you are wrong, all I am saying is that according to WIKI policies it is very clearly stated that you can not add infos to a living person biography without having a reliable source. Find said cites, add them and I would gladly accept your addition to the article.--Meryam90 (talk) 19:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So maybe I'm not getting your point (especially since I don't know what "gangerous" means)--how is "The film deals with the issues of prohibition of alcohol, prostitution, and drugs in Gujarat" not entirely vague? In what way is the film "dealing" with the issues? By promoting them? Satirizing them? Criticizing them? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! ManaliJain (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was confused myself till they released the second song. king regards. Meryam90 (talk) 07:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article is about a film still set in the future. Never been updated.

Hello, Meryam90,

We typically only "draftify" recently created articles which has been defined, roughly, as anywhere from 3-6 months old. This article is 18 months old and so your page move was reverted by another editor. If you believe this article should not be part of the project, you can use one of Wikipedia's forms of article deletion, CSD, PROD, or AFD, whichever seems appropriate. Or you could work on improving the article yourself! Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharvari Wagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabir Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before I begin, this post is in no way shape or form intended to start a debate on this topic, not saying you would or anybody else that might see this would, but I feel I have to add that disclaimer.

Anybody, regardless of opinion on these companies, can agree both companies are heavily politicized right now. However, simply mentioning he's appeared in commercials for these companies does not in any way push any sort of political agenda and does not praise or criticize either side of belief of either company. With that being said, I have fixed the wording to ensure it cannot by taken political and just is simply stating he appeared in the commercials. To further push that it isn't intended to be political, I have turned it into a list of companies he's done commercials for.--Rockchalk717 06:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article you chose as the reliable source directly stated your intentions for you. Furthermore, he endorses tens of products and you only found those two to add to his page. Ahuh. Okay. As you say.

Those were the ones fresh in my mind because they've been the ones getting advertised. By adding this, I'm hoping it allows other editors to add the other endorsement deals he's had because I honestly am having trouble remembering the others because I know he's done others. Also, I didn't add that information or the source so I'm not sure what you mean by that, but if you're referring to the article title, I think you misread the editors intention. If they were furthering a political agenda they would have said their side was good and the other side is bad and you're a bad person for being on that side (not saying this about either side, just speaking generally here). Don't let an article's title tell you otherwise. But I'm going to leave this conversation before it takes a turn in a direction to a conversation I chose to not have on Wikipedia.--Rockchalk717 05:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to edit war with you over something that frankly I don't give a damn about. You seem to have some sort of issue with me because a source some other editor added into the article and are taking it out on the other edits. So I'm just going to leave Travis Kelce's article alone because I'm not getting a temporary ban over an edit war with an editor that appears to have some sort grudge against my edits. Have a fantastic day.--Rockchalk717 05:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Travis Kelce, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nike and Machine Gun Kelly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meryam90! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women's Premier League (cricket), an collaborative group which aims to support development of Women's Premier League related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. We trust you, Meryam90, and we know that you have a lot of interest in this area. So why wait? Join fast by signing your name here! Thanks, and happy editing! You can also invite others by placing {{subst:User:Vestrian24Bio/Wikiproject Women's Premier League (cricket)/Invitation}} in their talk page. This Wikiproject is still in the Proposal state; for it to be created a minimum number of participants needs to sign-up, I personally think you'd be interested in participating and left you this invite. Your participation is appreciated.

Vestrian24Bio (U, T, A, C, S) 12:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meryam90! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Asia cricket task force/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Asia cricket task force/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]