User talk:Maximilian775

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wgullyn were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberto Calara Mallari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roberto Calara Mallari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wgullyn (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wgullyn (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I added some reliable sources on your draft. I also resubmitted it for review. hope it helps. thankss Mekeni (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Earl K. Fernandes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, upon ordination, Earl K. Fernandes will be the first Indian-American Latin Catholic bishop in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Earl K. Fernandes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Earl K. Fernandes), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775,

Thank you for creating Sacred Heart Church (Columbus, Ohio).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 17:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Meatsgains: ! Thank you for your feedback! I do have a reliable source for this text, it’s just that my computer died and I had to save the page before I lost all of my work. I will add it as soon as I am back at my desktop. Thanks, again! Maximilian775 (talk) 18:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Sacred Heart Church (Columbus, Ohio). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of those templates, as far as I see, are resource-specific - how would I create one for the work I cited? Maximilian775 (talk) 22:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The attribution template I used is {{PD-notice}}. Just include it as part of your citation when copying from public domain documents. — Diannaa (talk) 01:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Holy Family,, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 04:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your edit on the Columbus church. Disambiguation in titles is only proper when there are multiple entries of the same name; here it is evident that there are no other articles with that full name. ɱ (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Maximilian775: - done, according to naming policies. ɱ (talk) 15:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I went to go change it and it had already been reverted. My bad! Maximilian775 (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775

Thank you for creating Saint Leo Oratory (Columbus, Ohio).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Maximilan775 – could you take a look at my comments on the nomination template about the hook please? To my mind, only a small change is needed, and I am keen to mark this as verified because all other aspects of the nomination are fine. I am going on holiday on Saturday for a week and may struggle to get the chance to edit Wikipedia during that period, so if you could have a look in the next 24 hours that would be great. Best, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 21:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, so sorry! I've been getting back into the swing of things with the start of the academic year. I understand your critique, but as a newer editor am unsure as to how to edit the DYK itself. I assume a better phrasing would be "that the second-oldest church of the Diocese of Columbus, St. Mary of the Assumption (pictured), was named a minor basilica by Pope Francis on the Vigil of the Assumption of Mary? " / Could you indicate to me how to edit the DYK itself? Maximilian775 (talk) 13:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Sorry I couldn't reply to this message; I've just got back from holiday, and I only had my phone with me which made it impossible to read "Talk" pages and reply to messages. I see other users were able to help you on this occasion, but if you would like to nominate any more articles for DYK in the future and need any advice, please do ask me on my Talk page and I will be happy to help. PS At this stage it looks like the hook will appear on the Main Page on the evening of 23rd September (US time; early hours of 24th September UK time), in the coveted "pictured" slot. The following day you will be able to see how many views the article had during that day: there will be a link on the article Talk page. Best, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 20:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugene O'Connell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daniel Murray and Paul Cullen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If we can bring the biography of every archabbot to a good article and the list, to be made, to a featured list, it would make for a nice good topic -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 20:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This could be very neat. How close are the existing pages to GA status? Maximilian775 (talk) 21:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leander Schnerr has been nominated and Aurelius Stehle looks close. The hardest will be Boniface Wimmer (due to the large volume of sources), Rembert Weakland (due to the sex abuse), and Martin Bartel (due to being alive and not much being written about him). -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 11:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Basilica of St. Mary of the Assumption (Lancaster, Ohio), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Basilica of St. Mary of the Assumption (pictured), a church in the Diocese of Columbus, was named a minor basilica by Pope Francis on the vigil of the Assumption of Mary? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Basilica of Saint Mary of the Assumption (Lancaster, Ohio). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Basilica of St. Mary of the Assumption (Lancaster, Ohio)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Silas Chatard

added links pointing to Diocese of Indianapolis and Rector

Aloysius John Wycisło

added a link pointing to Albert Meyer

Regis Canevin

added a link pointing to Hugh Boyle

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Neraz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Edward Fitzgerald and Anse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Joncas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Roach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Garth Henning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint John's University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maximilian775,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Pbritti (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

~ Pbritti (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Philip Moger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Catholic bishop-elect Philip Moger knew that he wanted to become a priest when he was eight years old? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philip Moger. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Philip Moger), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted someone to at least glance at my sandbox articles on ritual families and liturgical uses before I push them to the main space. Would you mind just doing a quick check on them and adding whatever you think is relevant? These are the two: User:Pbritti/sandbox/Rite (liturgy) and User:Pbritti/sandbox/Use (liturgy). Thanks! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay! They look generally strong.

On "Rite", why do you call it the liturgy of St. Mark rather than the liturgy of Saint Cyril?

As to "use", where are you pulling the list of uses from?

Additionally, is there any reason why you didn't link to the Archive Dot Org version of Attwater's book?https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.177981

Maximilian775 (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Liturgy of St. Mark" is the typical Byzantine Rite name for the liturgy (think how some EO call the Roman Rite Mass the Liturgy of St. Gregory). It's the name used most of the sources I have so I stuck with it for the article. I pulled the use list from two books buts clearly neglected links to most of it. Thanks for linking the Attwater book; I should add that but I need to ensure its the same printing with the same pages. Thanks! ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alfred Koch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alfred Joseph Koch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alfred Koch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alfred Joseph Koch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John-Nhan Tran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John-Nhan Tran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Charles Borromeo Seminary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Miraculous Medal Shrine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Yes, I email the diocese and they replied back. They mentioned that they would be adding more ordination info to the website. Roberto221 (talk) 20:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A private email does not conform to WP:RS and so the date of the ordination ought not be included until it is published formally. Maximilian775 (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Mary's Catholic Church (Delaware, Ohio), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mission Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Albert Bahhuth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Albert Bahhuth fled the Lebanese Civil War and owned a Subway franchise before being named an auxiliary bishop for the Archdiocese of Los Angeles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albert Bahhuth. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Albert Bahhuth), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if you got the ping, buy you are needed on the DYK template for Saints Peter and Paul Seminary. Scorpions1325 (talk) 23:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that State Auto Mutual's life-size nativity scene was donated to the Museum of Catholic Art and History in 2023 for display at St. Joseph Cathedral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saints Peter and Paul Seminary, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Saints Peter and Paul Seminary, the last Catholic high school seminary in Ohio before its closure in 1990, was designed with influences from Chinese architecture? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saints Peter and Paul Seminary. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Saints Peter and Paul Seminary), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

aint you supposed to be on a media fast ~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 00:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have been encouraged to maintain hobbies suitable to the state of life we are being formed for; this website is one of mine.

Maximilian775 (talk) 12:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Maximilian775 (talk) 12:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

reply to my letter ~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 02:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Binch I done did reply don't blame me that you apparently live in the middle of nowhere, based on the name of your new place of residence. Maximilian775 (talk) 16:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marcos G. McGrath, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marcos G. McGrath, the Catholic archbishop of Panama, was allowed to enter Manuel Noriega's "witch house" and other residences, and found evidence of torture, devil worship, and voodoo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marcos G. McGrath. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marcos G. McGrath), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	Easter Joy
	Happy Easter to a fine editor! May you have a kind and joyful Paschaltide! ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, OFM. Conv.. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Michael Thomas Martin. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Michael Thomas Martin. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Michael T. Martin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that with the appointment of Michael Martin as Bishop of Charlotte, the Conventual Franciscans are now the most represented religious order among American Catholic bishops? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michael Thomas Martin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Michael T. Martin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

WaggersTALK 00:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Gregory McGrath, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kenneth Richards (bishop), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maximilian775. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mark Gregory McGrath".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]