User talk:46.97.170.112

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Angry Red Hammer Guy <💬> 17:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Angry Red Hammer Guy <💬> 17:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Talk:Gina Carano. This applies to talk pages as well. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say anything that wasn't already on wikipedia or easily deducible from information on wikipedia. 46.97.170.112 (talk) 09:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

IP, your continued comments about BLP subjects is a problem. Comments such as these [[1]], [[2]] as they disparage BLP subjects (and others). If you have specific edits you think should be made or comments on specific edits please do. The talk pages are not a wp:FORUM to express your feelings about article subjects. Springee (talk) 13:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Springee:If that is the case, I apologize, however, in this particular case, I'm not seeing the problem. The closest the two linked edits I made come to anything "disparaging" is describing another editor's sumary of a source that's being discussed for inclusion as "nonsense". Furthermore, you say If I have specific edits I think should be made, or comments on specific edits, then I should do that, instead of expressing my feelings. The thing is, both instances relate to discussions of specific edits, one of which I myself made.

My comments on Ben Shapiro relate to wether or not his review of a book (the subject of the first article) is due. I removed mention of two reviews of the book, which I believe came from fringe sources and are undue. That specific comment is a response to another IP user who kept insisting on reverting my edits and attacking my person. Incidentally, other editors have confirmed that I was in the right.

Regarding the Peterson article, my comments are part of an excessively long thread on whether a specific edit should be made to the article, namely the inclusion of a two paragraph summary of Mishra's and Brooker's analysis of Peterson's ideologies and the parallels they draw with fascism. The comments I made are all part of this discussion: my reasoning as to why the information should be included, and my responses to two particular editors who I do not believe are being impartial here, and appear to be engaging in the kind of sophistry I've seen from Jordan Peterson apologists on Youtube. My comments have nothing to do with my feelings.

I'm not sure which are the disparaging comments I've made about BLP subjects. I do not believe I've said anything that's worse than what User:JzG said. If I was wrong in my assumption that the behavior of an admin is a good indicator of what is and what isn't acceptable on talk pages, then just say so. 46.97.170.112 (talk) 09:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hockeycatcat. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Little Mermaid (upcoming film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 46.97.170.0/24. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose this "editor" be blocked from contributing to any talk pages. He's clearly an unhinged bad faith actor who tries to treat each talk page he targets like his own personal left-wing blog and edits them based on his own political biases with no regard for fairness. He's also fond of personal attacks and weasel words to describe people he doesn't like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:10a2:5cb0:8c51:3029:9eb0:20b5 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 46.97.170.0/24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Mark Milley, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. The foregoing is a boilerplate notice -- Actually, I did not revert your disruptive addition to the talk page -- see this edit and my edit summary there. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]