User talk:104.232.119.107

This is my talk page. I'm the user formerly known as toobigtokale (contribs). I'm Korean American and grew up in Korea. I can speak Korean, conversational Chinese, and basic Japanese. Samples of my old work: March First Movement and 1883 Korean special mission to the United States. Compiling explanation of why I don't have an account and other relevant stuff:

Some explanations about my editing philosophy. Due to the small size of the Korean-speaking community, I make two intentional decisions:

1. I try to edit quickly, boldly, and in high volume. I target pages I think others are unlikely to work on and that I think are important (culturally, pageview count, social impact, topics of interest to visitors/foreigners, interest to historians). I'm trying to provide basic foundation for as many important pages as possible, and often choose not to go into depth when returns begin to diminish.
2. You may see me having difficult discussions around. This is because a minority of my writing is on human rights topics that are complicated and controversial (as is much of 20th century East Asian history). Writing on these topics is hard and I readily admit I'm not the best writer or historian. But if I don't cover these topics, few others will. I am not nationalistic; I like humans and dislike when they are hurt.

I really do appreciative all feedback. I encourage you to edit my writing and disagree with me; I promise to try and be kind and thoughtful in response. Disagreement is a part of the process. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 06:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

toobigtokale here, visiting Korea on vacation, this is my IP for a few weeks. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 09:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you ever return to your original account? I'm afraid that I won't recognize you editing as an IP. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Am I able to after an RTV? Don't I need to create a new account instead? I don't know the protocol for it. I'm considering returning because being an IP adds admin burden to others, even if it's beneficial to me. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 03:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the OP; I decided to just create a new account. This is my new account. seefooddiet (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your contributions to 1883 Korean special mission to the United States and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Godtres (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Prince Imperial Waneun, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please discuss the issues on talk page before removal of major content. Thanks, ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 07:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm toobigtokale aka Renamed user 1oj3saabam. The content I removed on this page was systemic to hundreds of pages (excessive unsourced details on family trees on Korea-related articles), and I've already discussed these content changes with the people who added them (e.g. User talk:Deuxbleu#Sourcing and detail; there's one or two other users who engaged in this and I've posted on their pages too.). They have expressed no objections to the edits, and I've checked, and across the hundreds of pages that I performed similar edits on (examples here [1]), virtually none of them seem to have been reverted, nor did anyone post on my former talk page to question my edits [2].

I know this matters less because fewer people can see it, but I've discussed this with the Wikipedia Discord on three occasions too. Each time people either agreed that the pruning as a good move or were neutral.

I strongly believe policy is on my side with the edits (namely WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:RS). I have done the right thing with discussing the removal of certain edits with the relevant users and leaving edit comments explaining my rationale. This is the first time someone has questioned the edits. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example of an edit I made along these lines. I think any editor familiar with Wikipedia's policies would be hard-pressed to explain why an unsourced Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandfather is desirable information to have on a biography page. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 104.232.119.107! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Invincible (TV series) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Invincible (TV series), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Indagate (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder; I'm pretty familiar with the policy (long-time user). I haven't passed the three revert threshold. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 17:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your IP doesn't have a long editing history so gave you the softer warning, but if you are a long-time user you should be more familiar with policies. Didn't say you had broke WP:3RR, that doesn't make what you've done okay, you have made the same edit three times now, twice being reverts of two users, so please stop and just discuss until you have consensus. Indagate (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:EmailUser (looks like this is the one) is not available for IP users. You need to directly post your email address somewhere. If you don't want it to be permanently visible, you can

• post it on your user talk page (this page) or a page like Wikipedia:Sandbox, and ask an admin to hide it later; or
• use https://pastebin.com/ , which gives an option for the posted text to expire after a certain period of time.

172.56.232.159 (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is: https://pastebin.com/9wXW9B3N 104.232.119.107 (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello, im gaismagorm. Ive noticed you labelled an edit as "admin stuff" in the summary. while I personally found the edit's contents fine, the summary was not. In general, you shouldn't say you are an admin on wikipedia, unless you are an admin.

have a nice day! Gaismagorm (talk) 23:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh whoops, sorry, that wasn't my intent. I meant "administrative" as "technical busywork". I'll watch that word from now on. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ah i see, no worries! Gaismagorm (talk) 23:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to March 1st Movement have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wiiformii (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is User:Toobigtokale; I have a long editing history on Wikipedia and am taking a poorly-enforced wikibreak. You just performed a significant reversion; can you explain what the rationale is? Keep in mind that I wrote basically the entirety of this article even after your reversion and have significant plans to continue editing the article. Could you at least wait a week or two until I finish editing to make changes to your liking? Now there's edit conflicts. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There were no sources cited, especially for the claims mentioned in what I reverted. If you need help please check out Citing Sources. Wiiformii (talk) 02:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at the version and count the number of sources you removed. Are you thinking of the lead? Are you familiar with MOS:CITELEAD? It reads: Because the lead usually repeats information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none.

Is this the point of confusion? 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From the source cited in the lead section there doesn't seem to be anything referencing disinformation campaigns by the Japanese. Wiiformii (talk) 02:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct me if I was wrong about the source, Also since it seems you are making very large edits I think putting a (Template:In use) may be useful to convey the large edits Wiiformii (talk) 02:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's several misunderstandings. That reference comes before that claim; there's no reason the reference would support it. There's an entire section in the article that backs up the claim... Instead of reverting to an arbitrary point, you should have tagged me somewhere and asked me to put the sources in. That would take me less than a minute to do; instead you reverted over 10 hours of work to an arbitrary point.

Just in case WP:CITELEAD still isn't fully understood, please look at these various featured-level articles: Joseph Priestley House, Knap Hill, Kona Lanes. None of these have any references in the lead. That abides by CITELEAD; the refs for these claims are in the body, as is the case wit hme.

Granted, the claim you mention is indeed controversial and possibly could be cited. But CITELEAD says The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. You did not obtain editorial consensus before the reversion. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits can be very easily reverted, if you want I can. I am not too much into it and if you were working hard I respect it. I solely was confused on the first claim I saw. Wiiformii (talk) 02:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do so. And please be more mindful of these kinds of situations in future; I'd like to at least see some acknowledgement that protocol was not properly followed here. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point on Template:In use; I'll add that after we resolve this. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I deleted it, I just did not want a warning on your username to be conveyed as most people do not enjoy having warnings. Wiiformii (talk) 02:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok; in future I recommend you ask the person before reverting lengthy discussions. One-off small mistake messages are probably ok to erase, but some warnings (I'd argue this) provide context for others. Thanks for discussing this with me afterwards. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I am sorry if it caused any troubles and I was truthfully not super aware of WP:CITELEAD to the best of my knowledge. Wiiformii (talk) 02:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok; you clearly have good intentions and do a lot of helpful things otherwise. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "poorly-enforced wikibreak"? If you're saying you've been blocked on another account then that's against Wikipedia policy and can get your block extended. Indagate (talk) 07:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RTV and WP:WB. By "poorly-enforced", I mean "I am bad at taking Wikibreaks". You're also capable of checking if I was blocked or not. If I was blocked and trying to evade detection on an IP, why would I openly disclose my previous username and why would I edit basically all the same pages I used to in my same writing voice and in high volume? You can check; my editing behavior is really similar on this ip and my prev account.

I know we had a tense discussion previously, but let's please just bury the hatchet and disengage. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 09:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin so have no way of checking if you've edited on another account using your IP. I haven't seen you disclose your previous username and nowhere near familar enough with you to recognise what pages you edit and how. Your message just sounded like potentially evading a block so questioned. Indagate (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're able to check block logs with the usernames I mentioned multiple times on this page. I don't want to turn this into an argument though; I apologize for being confrontational before. My intentions are usually good but my tone often comes off strong; it's upsetting to read an assumption that I was worthy of being banned and then am now dodging said ban. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 09:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiiformii Tagging; this is time sensitive. You caught me in the middle of working on the article. I'd much rather you point out specific problem areas that we can discuss and compromise on, than revert to some arbitrary step in the over 100 edits I've made in this article thus far. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Death's Game, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This behaviour doesn't align as an ex-EC editor when obviously you were manually reverted twice (I assumed this would have been flagged in edit conflict page) for changing what is obviously a general note (hidden comment) that purposes is there for reference. Furthermore, I also don't see what is the exact purposes and/or intention for changing "x words" to "FIX ME". Care to explain, this WP:IDHT behaviour? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

?? I'm a bit puzzled by this; I'm addressing grammar and giving feedback as per Wikipedia:Peer review/Death's Game/archive1. Are you not seeing the grammar and prose being addressed in these edits? 104.232.119.107 (talk) 20:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FIX ME is because I didn't do another word count, as the summaries are likely to change again in near future as part of the GA review process. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Paper9oll tagging so we can get this resolved 104.232.119.107 (talk) 22:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@104.232.119.107 Of course, you're puzzled because since when did I mentioned on grammar? I was clearly talking about changing "x words" to "FIX ME" twice in the edit summary in which for twice you WP:IDHT completely and still persisted with this disruptive editing by selecting your revision in the edit-conflict page, we are both editing the same portion at the same time. Neither was changing to "FIX ME" addressed in the edit summary for subsequent edits. If you're not willing to do a reword count then kindly don't touch "x words" then as I don't see how it's a improvement and also why "FIX ME" is helpful in any way. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? I never received a single notice about an edit conflict, and I didn't notice your intermediate edits until now. I swear this is true; I don't know why you're assuming malace and that I'm acting in bad faith. We know each other and have reached agreements together in the past.

If I do a word count, can we go back to my edits? Because in the process of undoing an invisible comment, you've removed visible edits to users. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 06:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you didn't read other parts of this talk page, this is @Toobigtokale btw. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 06:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@104.232.119.107 I'm trying to AGF here however the actions made triggered me otherwise. Whether or not, you did or did not encountered edit-conflict page can't be confirmed, this is just my assumptions given that we are editing the same portion i.e. you changing to "FIX ME" and me manually reverting back to "x words" at the same time. Regardless, if you're willing to do a word count then continue otherwise don't edit that portion i.e. "x words" to "FIX ME", you can however continue to edit the grammar or prose that you want instead if you're willing to do reword count. And finally, yes, I know that you're Toobigtokale hence I questioned this behaviour (i.e. persisting in changing to "FIX ME") not aligning with an ex-EC editor from the start above. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, all I can offer is my word that I'd never knowingly ignore feedback or edit conflicts. From past experience with me, you know that's true; I sought out and took feedback on my AWB edits. I promise I didn't see any edit conflict notices, nor did I notice your intermediate edits, otherwise I would have stopped.

Out of curiosity, what does "EC" mean? 104.232.119.107 (talk) 07:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@104.232.119.107 Ok sure, EC is acronym for WP:Extended confirmed. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're curious, I figured out what happened. I was gradually working on changing the x words to FIX ME and was inconsistent about when I did it. Was distracted by the prose and decided to double check that all of them had been converted to FIX ME later, so I didn't notice that you had reverted some of them; it just looked to me like I hadn't gotten around to changing those yet. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey toobigtokale (if you still go by that),

Happy to see you editing again! We missed you when you were gone. By any chance can you still access your Wikipedia account after the courtesy vanishing? Since you’re editing anyways you might as well go back or make a new account (toobigtokaletwo?) if you can’t reaccess it. Of course, if there’s a personal reason for editing under an IP I don’t want to be a bother. Dantus21 (talk) 01:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the kind words 🙂 Not having an account has helped me reduce the amount of time I spend on the site; it's been mildly effective so far and I want to keep it that way for now. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 01:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see it’s been working out for you. Wishing you the best! Dantus21 (talk) 04:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest "twobigtwokale" or a variant thereof...? Godtres (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great suggestion lol I may take it up if needed 104.232.119.107 (talk) 21:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to let you know that your edits have been getting flagged by Wikipedia's recent patrol filters for bad faith and disruptive edits. I don't see a problem with your edits, but I wanted to bring it to your attention. I noticed that your talk page is also quite full of editors who also saw these flags, and likely responded to them. Just a quick heads-up if any more of your edits are disputed in the future! TheXug (talk) 04:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I'm unfortunately aware of it too... 😅 I used to have an account and made even more sweeping edits on even more controversial topics, but almost never had anyone call me out. At least this process keeps me honest and transparent I guess.

To you and others monitoring changes, sorry for all the work my flags create. You're all doing important work! 104.232.119.107 (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TV Animal Farm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of issues:

I'm concerned that your use of Tanaka is a case of WP:SYNTH. While Nitobe does indeed refer to Korea as such, read in context it is not readily apparent that he meant it "disparagingly". In fact, he compares it favorably to Japan's own past. Here's the paragraph in full:

Life is Arcadian. I feel as though I were living three thousand years back, in the age of our Kami. Many a face do I see that I should have taken for the likeness of a Kami—so sedate, so dignified, so finely chiseled, and yet so devoid of expression. The very physiognomy and living of this people are so bland, unsophisticated and primitive that they belong not to the twentieth or the tenth—nor indeed to the first century. They belong to a prehistoric age.

Paternalistic? Low-key condescending? Maybe. But the way you presented the text made it seem as if it were a call to bludgeon the peninsula into the Japanese yoke, which it is most definitely not.

Another issue. I didn't realize who you were until I saw your talk page just now. I'm not sure why you're using multiple IPs, especially when you're making potentially controversial edits. While I'm sure you have good reasons, it's a bad look. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my previous post, I wrote this: Sometimes I have edited from other IPs, but I choose to make those lesser edits. I haven't really made controversial edits on other IPs. In addition, I think you underestimate how frequently I identify myself (the moment someone presents disagreement towards any of my edits I identify myself), and given that we've interacted positively in the past I'm a little sad that there seems to be a reading of bad faith here.

I don't really agree with your characterization of the quote, I don't really know what to say other than that. It's not really out of context and not out of line with what the author of the paper is suggesting about Nitobe, and what Nitobe himself expresses elsewhere in that paper.

And the sentiments in that quote aren't low-key??? Calling an entire race of people primitive based on a short visit?

I'm skeptical. Let's continue to discuss. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 00:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for additional comment—I don't buy that a favorable comparison is being made at all? At absolute best it's conveying an extremely backhanded noble savage compliment. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 00:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ankara Park (Seoul), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Park (Seoul), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 07:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm CGP05. Your recent edit(s) to the page Nodeulseom appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CGP05 (talk) 01:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what this is motivated by? The article was unsourced before my arrival, and I completely sourced it with reliable sources afterwards. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 01:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, that was a mistake on my part. Your edits look very good, I just restored all of them. CGP05 (talk) 01:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CGP05 courtesy tag 104.232.119.107 (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• Introductory tutorial
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• The Teahouse

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (104.232.119.107) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! OnlyNano 19:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I made a response to your post about the image on the Koryo-saram (back when you had an account). I pinged you but am not sure you got the notification. Have you seen it? Thank you. Dantus21 (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imun Seolnongtang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Syngman Rhee and Kim Ku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tears of Mokpo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul Foreign Language Spelling Dictionary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saeseom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 104.232.119.107! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GongU Madang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saeseom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GongU Madang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GongU Madang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blanes tree (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Sorry about yesterday

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you, I appreciate it. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Draft:Sejong Mall, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Douglas Santana (talk • contribs) 04:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just a heads-up that some of your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nori Bunasawa got caught up in my mass collapsing spree there. They were all replies to the now-pblocked editor so figured that it wouldn't be the end of the world if they got collapsed along with the wall of text. Apologies for any inconvenience, it's not a perfect solution but was best I could come up with. If anything pertinent did get collapsed, please feel free to repost it. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 06:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, no worries. Thanks! 104.232.119.107 (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've suggested a pivot/merge at Talk:Hagoromo Bungu#This article and Draft:Sejong Mall ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 14:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied 104.232.119.107 (talk) 21:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I've made some changes to the Miraclass article by neutralizing the tone and removing promotional material. I also reviewed the references and added more appropriate sources. Could you please take a look and provide feedback? Thanks in advance. Rosuacamus (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naver Dictionary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]