Template talk:Bret Hart

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Professional wrestling Bret Hart is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling Canada: Alberta / Sport This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related This template is supported by WikiProject Alberta. This template is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport. Journalism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism

Like Owen or Stu.*Treker (talk) 00:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I deliberately left the link to just the family article to avoid arbitrarily picking which family members to include. A collapsible inclusion of Template:Hart family is a possible alternative. I tend to think less is more though.LM2000 (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Might be for the best.*Treker (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I accept that external links apparently shouldn't be on the template but the template link has nothing to do with that and it makes it much easier to click than the tiny V in the corner.*Trekker (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This would be a completely pointless circular link to this template. No other navbox has this, the V-T-E links work perfectly well everywhere else, no reason to make an exception here. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well I totally disagree with that but I removed it again anyway because otherwise this is going to turn into huge bitchfest like it always does when it's up to personal opinion.*Trekker (talk) 14:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]