Talk:XVideos

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 3 September 2017, see discussion. snow keep, 28 August 2017, see discussion.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the XVideos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Pornography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

Carachi (talk) 21:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is the logo in Commons but not used here. Why is that? And, there is nothing but geometric shape and text, nothing that could be copyrighted. 85.217.36.130 (talk) 23:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I've added the logo to the infobox. Thanks for the heads up. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to a WHOIS by GoDaddy XVideos is registered to a Hong Kong address. All contact information GoDaddy has is also Hong Kong specific. However it seems that the actual registration information is coming from whois.networking4all.com. Godaddy and Whois.net both state that is where the results they display are taken from. 174.53.135.141 (talk) 20:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've bumped this up to high importance due to it being according to the article 'the most popular pornography website in the world'.

• I restored the Low importance rating. The rating is for its importance to the pornography WikiProject. This is a website that is obscure outside pornography with an article that cites only one independent reliable source. If this deserves a High importance rating like AVN Award, please add citations to reliable sources to prove it. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @User:Gene93k. I found this page by surfing the stubs tabs. I am 14 and am not planning on doing any searching into this topic, but I can leave the source [[1]]. If it is the 50 most viewed website in the world I would say it is notable enough to be promoted. JoshMuirWikipedia (talk) 12:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The current source for the popularity claim (Toppornsites.com) makes me instantly doubt the claim. The claim is supported by Alexa and SimilarWeb which I propose should be the references. --Markbrown00 (talk) 00:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all, I'm back here again, wondering how this is not high importance. I've just come here from Lowest quality high-popularity articles, where this page is rated number 8. I will say it again, on a Wikiproject with over 300 articles that are high priority, the most popular website for viewing porn should be at least in there. JoshMuirWikipedia (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article's prose consists (in its entirety) of:

• XVideos is a free pornographic video sharing and viewing website based in Prague.

There's nothing in the article copy to indicate why it's significant or notable. Alexa rankings are not part of web notability guidelines. I will re-add the tag. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@K.e.coffman: I've started an AfD here. DrStrauss talk 15:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hello, I believe that there should be a change in one piece of information here.

Instead of saying, "As of 9 March 2018, it was the 38th most visited website in the world."

It should say, "As of 22 March 2018, XVideos is the 5th most visited site in the world according to SimilarWeb."

The link is down below for credibility.

https://www.similarweb.com/website/xvideos.com#overview

Pieman1395 (talk) 05:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a good reason to use SimilarWeb instead of Alexa Internet rankings? The latter seems to be the standard. Why are they so different? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a difference on how these two groups figure out which site is the most popular. Alexa takes a combination of daily visitors and page views on a specific website for the past month to determine how popular it is. However, SimilarWeb strictly uses total visits in the past 6 months which I believe is a more accurate way to portray how popular a site is. For example, one person could visit a website and look at 10,000 pages on that particular website, now according to Alexa that would most likely be more popular than a website that has lets say 5,000 visits from different people. I just believe that SimilarWeb portrays a more accurate sense of which websites are more "popular" Pieman1395 (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: That's unnecessary. All website articles on Wikipedia use Alexa in the standard template. We cannot start looking for other rankers that rank one website higher so as to publicize it. See WP:PROMOTION. –Ammarpad (talk) –Ammarpad (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a forum
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello I don't know how to say just plz help me out I'm a girl and a other girl added a fake video of me she edited my face with that girl.. and now she's sending that video to my frnds and family. I'm not that girl my hair and my body is entirely different .but little bit law is same and she is sharing that video again and again I'm helpless I have no option to prove my self right .. plz help me out I want a complain against her I wanna arrest her she downing my image in my town.plzz if you are listening to me plz help me out 2409:4053:2182:EDD7:F1D1:4981:B540:8B2E (talk) 05:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] See Content removal at info.xvideos(dot)com/content Peaceray (talk) 07:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Screen of Xvideos login page.PNG. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 19:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Screen of Xvideos login page.PNG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

37.239.224.25 (talk) 07:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Tollens (talk) 07:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This site is banned in many countries. And that s not specific to it, as much of the pornographic sites are banned. Should we mentionned every country, or not? I ve tried to make a chapter on Iranese censorship, which has been refused. What s the difference with Chinese censorship? JeromRP (talk) 09:46, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, essentially there is no difference, so I have removed the censorship part as a whole, as virtually all countries banned or tried to ban pornographic pages as a whole. Might fit better in Pornography laws by region if it isn't mentioned there already, or a spin-off article concentrating on censorship of pornographic websites. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thumb

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

93.110.133.2 (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 14:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

XVideos

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Onwabela (talk) 10:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Onwabela (talk) 10:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

change the line of "the owner of MindGeek," to "the owner of Aylo or in the past MindGeek," i don't want to edit the page myself, just telling to make a small edit. 2603:6010:2200:9947:F4F8:E8D0:F268:C3AF (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Now "MindGeek (now Aylo)". Peaceray (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]