Talk:Unenlagia

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The original "Unenlagia NT.jpg" was used as the main - and only - article image. Upon seeing another - and, in my opinion, better - image ("Unenlagia BW.jpg") on the "Dromaeosauridae" article, I used it as the main image, moving the original to a location on the side of the article. The reasons for doing so are as follows:

• 1. Stylistic Consistency - Most of the images used in the infoboxes are stylistically the same, the works of "ArthurWeasley";this is likewise the case for the new image.
• 2. Image Quality - The new image is of a higher resolution and quality than the original, while still being under free license.
• 3. Image Representivity - the new image better portrays Unenlagia, as it shows it actually doing something, as opposed to just standing there.

RadicalTwo (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Arthur Weasly did both of those images--the newer one (formerly in the infobox) is probably more accurate since it has a skull more like its (probable) close relative Buitreraptor. But it's so incompletely known both are plausible. Dinoguy2 (talk) 03:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Both are AW? Interesting, though the one I've placed in the infobox has the style associated with his work (i.e. see the "Hynerpeton BW" and "Eusthenopteron BW" - indeed, many proto-tetrapod - images). RadicalTwo (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those are his old-style ones. His newer ones usually have backgrounds and the files end in NT (his real name is Nobu Tamura). You can see his gallery here: [1]. Here's his web site: [2] Dinoguy2 (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]