Talk:StarDict

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Linguistics: Applied Linguistics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force. Books: Reference works This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

The author of StarDict is HuZheng(in Chinese as 胡正), while the software StarDic author's name is MaSuan(in Chinese as 马苏安). Although with similar names, they are two diferent softwares.

StarDic is the predecessor of StarDict.

StarDict is now faced with a great difficulty that its author is no longer a colledge student as before and certainly there is much less time for him to devote himself to the project of StarDict.

Hopefully, someday, there will be someone, who should be as skilled as the author, willing to join the project of StarDict!

Lingoes is NOT "Free Software"; as stated in: LINGOES TRANSLATOR END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT, section 2; which says: "Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, Disassembly and Modification. You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the SOFTWARE PRODUCT and change (add, delete or modify) the resources of the compiled assembly, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation."

It's just "Freeware". So I edited the section and put it under the proper title: Proprietary Software.

77.237.172.1 (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC) (I don't have a constant IP, so the regarding talk page and edits are not mine!)[reply]

In case anyone knows of a working alternative, the link referenced here is defunct:

Dictionaries in the StarDict format are available at http://reciteword.cosoft.org.cn/stardict-iso/stardict-dic/

(I'm completely new to StarDict, so I haven't a clue where to look yet.) --☥ Xyzzy Avatar ☥ 09:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xyzzyavatar (talk • contribs)

The official site of the project is unreachable for several days.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.33.21.105 (talk) 07:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try: http://code.google.com/p/stardict-3/

Chris Fynn (talk) 06:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have any details on the copyright infringement complaints. Who made them, and about what portions of the software? That is sort of important information that should be included in the article.

From what I can tell, most speculation is that it is with the dictionary files, not the program, but I cannot find any solid information online.

A concensus of online speculation is not a "reliable source" and is hardly more reliable than rumors. --Robert Wm "Ruedii" (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a StarDict project on Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/stardict-3/ which seems to be current.

Chris Fynn (talk) 06:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]