Talk:St Magnus Cathedral

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scottish Islands Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Reformed Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've put external links in to the Earl's Palace and Bishop's Palace, but someone may want to make these new pages, and also add Orkney categories as appropriate..dave souza 19:45, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article began as a stub on 4 September 2005, and St Magnus Cathedral was a disambiguation page as I recall, though it's not turning up on searches. On second thoughts it may have been a red link, which would account for the unfortunate confusion. It became a new article on 4 December 2005. There's a fair bit of duplication and though it's got less info, it has some points not covered here so I propose merging these points into this article. ...(revised) ..dave souza 21:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seem entirely sensible to merge these pages: this one was created in ignorance of the other. It was indeed a red link I followed. And your proposed method of dealing with the duplication sounds ideal. Kluseau 11:14, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very dubious about the necessity and indeed the correctness of the apostrophe in this article's title, as well as in all the references throughout Wikipedia. I have never, ever seen it used with an apostrophe on official church pamphlets and documents, books and newspapers in Orkney, etc., etc. The very few places I have seen it used are mostly other web pages (often in tandem with such clangers as "on the Island of Orkney"). But the vast majority of sites online do not use the apostrophe.

In short, I believe it is wrong, and should be removed. Thorf 15:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some good evidence: the Church of Scotland web site has no apostrophes present. Compare this with the same site's references to other Scottish cathedrals such as St Giles' in Edinburgh, and St Mungo's in Glasgow, which have apostrophes intact. http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/contact/contactmap45.htm Thorf 15:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed: the official guide book purchased at the cathedral itself does not carry the aposrophe in the name. (Kluseau 09:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I see someone has restored the apostrophes without leaving any justification here. Unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary, I will go ahead and remove the apostrophes (again). Thorf 08:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to suggest that the page should be moved to "St. Magnus Cathedral" - without the apostrophe. Thorf 08:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone have a free picture of the statue of Bishop Bjarni Kolbeinsson in the cathedral? Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 04:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The mentioned "kirkjuvágr" must surely mean "bay of the church", not "church of the bay". Probably just a mix-up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apachepiken (talk • contribs) 23:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right. I have added a ref and explanatory note. Ben MacDui 09:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Magnus Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051117005714/http://www.orkney.gov.uk/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=636 to http://www.orkney.gov.uk/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=636

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]