Talk:Richard Flanagan

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Australia: Tasmania / Literature Low‑importance Richard Flanagan is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Mid-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Novels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What about his academic work - don't we need the earlier part of his career as well?User:SatuSuro 06:28, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

haha - 8 years later we have people making academic careers out of explaining him: *http://www.ca-cranston.com/Flanagan%20.pdf Representation of Region and Nation in Literary Culture Studies Conference, University of Madras, 2009. Transcript of Plenary session 'The (Hydro)power Relations within Nation and Region, and the (de)formation of Identity in the case of Richard Flanagan' by Dr. CA. Cranston. Discusses the relationship of Flanagan's novels, films, to Island politics.

removed as it is not tied into the article. satusuro 01:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Flanagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325104712/http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/media/archives_2003/archibald_prize_winner to http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/media/archives_2003/archibald_prize_winner

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section in particular reads like a publishers blurb rather than an encyclopedia article - every book quotes extensively from a positive review stating what an amazing writer Flanagan is. Some collection of critical assessment is appropriate, but the tone of this skews much too far toward seeking critical praise rather than describing what the novels are about, when they were published, what the context was, etc.Irregulargalaxies (talk) 04:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree a little. I mean, it does show the novels are notable, but you could add some differing views for neutrality. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will note that all bar two of the novels mentione din this section have specific pages dedicated to them so I would suspect that the bulk of the critical material relating to those works will appear on those pages and therefore doesn't belong here. Maybe the approach is to move some of the "critical responses" from this page to the specific novel pages. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If his severe hearing loss was corrected at age 6, presumably decades before he ever wrote anything, is it appropriate to categorise him as a deaf writer? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 08:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]