Talk:Manitoba Highway 29

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada Roads: Manitoba Low‑importance This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics: /  Manitoba This article needs a map. This article has a KML file. Canada: Manitoba Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.

The idea of renumbering MB 75 as MB 29 to match I-29 either needs a reputable source (i.e. public documents/media, not roadgeek discussion threads), or it needs to be deleted as wild speculation. VT hawkeye_{talk to me} 03:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three weeks, no response, and no Google results: time for renumbering stuff to go per WP:NOR. Please only add if verifiable -- thanks. VT hawkeye_{talk to me} 03:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am considering creating a set of Manitoba highway shield images for use in Wikipedia (such as to use in this and the I-29 article). However, it has come to my attention that the provincial wordmark and buffalo logo are used on the shields, in which case they'd be protected graphics. Is this true? If so, what are the restrictions on the use of the logo? Would using a low-res shield picture be a valid "logo" picture? --WhosAsking 15:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I went ahead and played it safe, uploading the shields under Fair Use provisions. --WhosAsking 15:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]