Talk:Lunar Orbital Station

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Moon task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance). Spaceflight: Space stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the space stations working group. Russia: Technology & engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Welcome to the Lunar Orbital Station discussion page!

Although some info supports this, there isn't enough and it is unknown if it is real. So maybe this page should be removed. I wouldn't like to see it go, but what do you think about it, stay, or go? Theguywhohatestwitter (talk) 14:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just discovered this page, and I'd agree that the likelihood of this ever being built is rather remote. It was described in a conference talk that was suggesting several different ideas, none of which are necessarily going to be built. It is "real" so far as I would have to suggest the conference talk was real and there is at least an outside chance that it could be built, but until hardware is being tested, contracts signed for its usage, and a launch slot allocated to its deployment... I'd call it mostly vaporware until it can be proven otherwise.

I've dealt with a similar situation in regards to the Galactic Suite concept which is all fluff pieces and nothing concrete as to if it will ever be flown. This concept seems to be even weaker than that sort of vaporware that I do think may be a scam. In this case, it was a "power point presentation" sort of like Space Station Freedom that did evolve into something more substantial. In other words, this concept may be real but highly unlikely that it will be built as presented.

Having more sources would be something that would help, and generally the "rule of thumb" is two or more sources for verification and "notability". Notability is a tricky concept on Wikipedia, and I find that it tends to be abused but still applies in this situation. The concept is notable because of who suggested the idea, but verification that this is indeed something even being worked upon ought to still happen. --Robert Horning (talk) 12:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think there needs to be a photo(s) on this page. The main one of my interest is http://www.russianspaceweb.com/images/los_ll_dock_1.jpg, however I think that you could also add http://www.russianspaceweb.com/images/los_ll_dock_front_2.jpg. Thanks! Theguywhohatestwitter (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

presented at a conference 14 years ago, Is this really notable? Gjxj (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]