Talk:i-number

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article is poorly formatted. The Wikipedia internals are exposed everywhere. Is this the way things are to be done now?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.7.253.189 (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2006

What's the point of such "innovations"?

To reinvent the wheel?

To create impressions of scientific innovation where there is none?

Out of the need for changing fashions?

To restrict access to a particular industry by creating industry-specific jargons?

To overwhelm?

Has the generic term hash code lost its applicability somehow over the years?

Or isn't i-number what I think it is: a standardised (or even not) hash code for web content?

If so, why not make this article exactly that short?

Also consider: buzzword, the opposite of jargon.

– 6birc (talk) 13:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on I-number. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513190900/http://gss.xdi.org/ to http://gss.xdi.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513190900/http://gss.xdi.org/ to http://gss.xdi.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041028085925/http://journal.planetwork.net/article.php?lab=reed0704 to http://journal.planetwork.net/article.php?lab=reed0704
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041026015309/http://journal.planetwork.net/ to http://journal.planetwork.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]