Talk:Human Rights Day

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 19 dates. [show] December 10, 2005, December 10, 2006, December 10, 2007, December 10, 2008, December 10, 2009, December 10, 2010, December 10, 2011, December 10, 2012, December 10, 2013, December 10, 2014, December 10, 2015, December 10, 2016, December 10, 2017, December 10, 2018, December 10, 2019, December 10, 2020, December 10, 2021, December 10, 2022, and December 10, 2023

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations (assessed as High-importance). Human rights High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. South Africa: PSP SA Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Wikipedia Primary School project. Holidays Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The development of this article is on my to-do list: do not merge. Gareth Hughes 22:40, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Gone on for quite long enough, that has. I'm going to remove the merge header. –Hajor 22:08, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)'t

I don't understand this statment, "Because the UDHR holds the world record as the most translated document (with more than 360 language versions available)" when, in fact, the Bible has over 2500 translations? CrummyVerses (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Keith RoperCrummyVerses (talk)[reply]

The external link to the HR Day site goes to info for 2005. I can't find UN/2006 HR page ... how about you? rewinn 19:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

somebody has done it. XavierV 22:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

One of the reasons to include spoken articles is that "(T)hey are a valuable learning tool for non-native English speakers and those that don't speak it at all. Having a large number of examples of how words are pronounced can be important." The speaker mispronounces "enunciation" as /ɪnʌŋˡkeɪʃn/. Should the entire recording be dumped?

In this article the section entitled "Human Rights" seems very random and does not seem to fit with the rest of the article, and the reference to India seems totally out of left field....anyone agree?216.179.3.166 (talk) 01:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a thought, I know the article links to the UN’s external text of The Declaration: but does Wikipedia reproduce that text?

It strikes me as being possibly a handy thing to do …

Cuddy2977 (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everybody. On behalf of the teams behind the Wikipedia Primary School research project, I would like to announce that this article was selected a while ago to be reviewed by an external expert. We'd now like to ask interested editors to join our efforts and improve the article before August 31, 2015 (any timezone) as they see fit; a revision will be then sent to the designated expert for review. Any notes and remarks written by the external expert will be made available on this page under a CC-BY-SA license as soon as possible, so that you can read them, discuss them and then decide if and how to use them. Please sign up here to let us know you're collaborating. Thanks a lot for your support! --Elitre (WPS) (talk) 06:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. As anticipated, some weeks ago Dr.Stephen Lowry agreed to review this article within the scope of the project linked above. You can find her notes in the PDF I just uploaded to Commons. We'd like to thank Dr. Lowry for his work and for his helpful notes. We invite everybody to feel free to reuse the review to improve the article and/or to comment it here. Best, Anthere (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Human Rights Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110629044532/http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=6420501 to http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=6420501

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Human Rights Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090209011530/http://unya.asn.au/write4rights.php to http://www.unya.asn.au/write4rights.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061209141501/http://www.pen.org/freedom/asia2004.html to http://www.pen.org/freedom/asia2004.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Human Rights Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111205213415/http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Day2011/Pages/HRD2011.aspx to http://www.ohchr.org/EN/newsevents/day2011/pages/hrd2011.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090115114004/http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=13366636&PageNum=0 to http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=13366636&PageNum=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]