Talk:Federal Council (Switzerland)

	Federal Council (Switzerland) was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 17, 2006 Peer review Reviewed July 9, 2006 Good article nominee Listed June 2, 2009 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Switzerland Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pre-2006 discussion can be found at Talk:Swiss_Federal_Council/Archive_1

Of the current seven members of the Council, three are women. That doesn't look like poor representation to me... --Jcmo (talk) 13:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it's a claim, and a claim needs an attribution. If it hasn't got one, remove it. obviously, women have been underrepresented 1971 to 1984, when there weren't any on the council. Since 1984, six out of fourteen Councillors elected were women. Now 6 is obviuosly still less than 50% of 14, but the progression was such that of six Councillors elected during the 2000s, three were women, so that for the past decade, the claim does not hold good. We are, of course, still waiting for the first time that four women are on the council, but the point is that gender is just not an issue in elections any longer. At this point, claiming that women are underrepresented is just as random a statement as claiming that redheads, or waterski enthusiasts, or cat owners are underrepresented. Obviously, if you elect seven out of four million people, lots of demographic segments will not be represented at all. But whether this is relevant or not is entirely dependent on, who can we cite as claiming it was relevant (WP:RS). --dab (𒁳) 10:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Swiss Federal Council/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I believe the article currently has multiple issues that need to be addressed, and as a result, I have delisted the article. Although several references are listed, there are no inline citations for the majority of the article's content which is required under the criteria. Add additional citations from a variety of sources to provide a balanced representation of the information present. Perhaps sources can be pulled from the main articles linked to within the article. Look to books, magazines, newspaper articles, other websites, etc. The lead also needs to be expanded to better summarize the article. See WP:LEAD for guidelines. There are also multiple grammar issues throughout the article as well as single sentences that should either be expanded on or incorporated into other paragraphs. Although the article has been delisted, the article can be return to GA status by addressing the above points. Once sources are added and cleanup is done, I recommend renominating the article at WP:GAN or you can contact me on my talk page and I'll review it for you so you can bypass the month-long backlog. If you need assistance with any of these issues, please contact me on my talk page and I'll do my best to help you out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Bundesrat der Schweiz 2011.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I watch TSR, Swiss news. Dec 2015.. The federal council has 8 members, not 7. Must have been increased by 1. One of the members was a very short man. Who is he? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markus451 (talk • contribs)

The article is correct (you can check out https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start.html in case of doubt). You probably mistook the new Federal Chancellor, Walter Thurnherr, for a council member. The chancellor, as the chief of staff for the council, is usually on their group pictures. MLauba ^(Talk) 22:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since it includes Walter Thurnherr, it's not technically a picture of the subject of the article, the (7-member) federal council. But then again, it's a very nice picture. Khromegnome (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Government of Switzerland has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 8 § Government of Switzerland until a consensus is reached. ^Queenof_Hearts 02:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "List of Firsts," is it WP:TRIVIA?

To me, this largely feels like an assortment of trivial facts - one that serves no real value to the article. However, I wanted to reach a WP:CONSENSUS on whether it should be rewritten, removed outright, or kept as is before making a significant change. MagicalFishing (talk) 12:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t agree at all. This is useful information on the political history and evolution in Switzerland. For instance the first seven councillors were all men and of the same party and 5 of them from the German speaking part of Switzerland, so it is worth noticing when these ceased to be true: when each party began to be represented, when the first woman entered the council, and so forth.--Sapphorain (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]