[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Duke Nukem: Time to Kill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have added some further information regarding the game and an image of the cover. I will also be adding further resources on the game which are referenced from a strategy guide online. Piecraft 22:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing doesn't mean copy-pasting wholesale. A lot of that stuff isn't written enyclopedically.--Drat (Talk) 08:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

I deleted the weapons and enemies section due to the above mentioned "referencing". The levels section is also copied, but there are some changes, and I don't know anything about the game, having never played it. I don't have the drive (I found this article while cleaning up after 64.229.159.4) to go through with a fine-tooth comb to see how much is copied. There are certainly some unencyclopedic/pov bits in there. Can someone more familiar with the game, or (less lazy than me) deal with it?--Drat (Talk) 08:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been copied to StrategyWiki:Duke Nukem: Time to Kill. -- Prod-You 18:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The holy handgrenade

[edit]

The game has a weapon called the Holy Handgrenade that's a direct Monty Python and the Holy Grail referance, might wanna put that in. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.190.19.210 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Expanding

[edit]

I'm considering expanding the article with a weapons list (among other things) but I see that it was deleted once before. Was there a reason? I know the game almost inside and out, it was the first game I got for the Playstation and I'm still playing it years later.

-- FreeFragSGS 14:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that section ages ago as it someone had copied it wholesale from an unofficial FAQ, in violation of copyright; even if it wasn't, it wasn't encyclopedically written. If you can write a list in your own words, in an encyclopedic and neutral manner, without it becoming a game-guide, go right ahead.--Drat (Talk) 02:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]