Talk:Diairesis

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Language / Ancient Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophy of language Ancient philosophy Linguistics: Philosophy of language This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Yes, the Stoic content should reside on this page, and Dihairesis should be a redirect to here. (Googling jstor.org shows 58 articles without h vs. 6 with.) Wareh 16:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll just redirect the page, can I leave it to you to take whatever content is useable and integrate it here? Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Here's the link to the old content, if you want to transfer anything: [1]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's still a mess, but I've combined the articles. Wareh 16:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]