Talk:Biscotti

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 19 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Cantucci. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Are there any theories as why we tend to import Italian food words into English in the plural form: biscotti, porcini, panini, etc? Let alone all the pasta shapes—though there you could argue, I suppose, that a spaghetto is not much use to a cook. —Ian Spackman 16:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm answering ten years later! Because that's how we come across these words, as plurals on packets of penne, spaghetti, biscotti, porcini etc. Another interesting question would be why we are unconscious that the names of pasta shapes are plurals and use them as singulars ("When the spaghetti is cooked..."). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Campolongo (talk • contribs) 10:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, just one year later than Campolongo (and 11 after Ian Spackman! "Spaghetti", "ravioli", etc. aren't singular in English, but numberless: they have no plurals. Do we ever say "spaghettis" or "raviolis"? Only when we mean different kinds of spaghetti or of ravioli. They're what we call mass nouns or "non-count nouns". --Thnidu (talk) 06:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've certainly heard raviolis in the U.S., and just last week cannolis. The curious one of late in terms of source is panini, as they/it do not normally come prepackaged with a plural label such as spaghetti, ravioli, etc. But sure enough, panini is the default form in North America, and is treated as singular rather than non-count, so that the normal plural is paninis. And then there's the reverse, the label lasagne anglicized to a singular in form, lasagna. 2600:8800:A400:37E0:3543:F1FF:AEA0:1491 (talk) 13:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian Spackman: I don't know the reason, but I think an American would be annoyed if from July 19, 2024, we wrote "United States of Americas", with "s" ;) JacktheBrown (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's already plural. Drsruli (talk) 05:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Took out the second "traditionally" in the first paragraph. It appears too quickly after the first.

Cantuccini appears to be identical or similar to the traditional Catalan carquinyolis. Are there any reliable sources about the origin of this cookie? Perhaps Italy or Spain/Catalonia? Libido 21:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged Carquinyoli into this article. --Una Smith (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the following addition as it has no source. If it is accurate, significant, and can be sourced, it should probably become a separate article.

The term "Biscotti" also refers to a new wireless telecommunications concept: a network side cookie (see HTTP_cookie). In the internet/computer world user tracking is achieved by putting a small piece of code on the consumer’s hardware. In a mobile environment the traditional cookie ecosystem does not work. Carriers are masking traffic, mobile browses do not support cookies, and much of the true analysis is hidden behind carrier firewalls. A biscotti refers to a network side cookie that is monitored and administered by the network operator.

—Ian Spackman (talk) 04:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a widely cited association of Pliny the Elder with Biscotti, but I have not been able to find a citation to any specific passage in Pliny. For a discussion see this blog entry. It seems that the present claim that "Pliny the Elder boasted that such goods would be edible for centuries" needs to be qualified unless a reliable source can be found. It may be significant that this claim is not found in the parallel articles in the other Western European wikipedias. SteveMcCluskey (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. I'd also note that numerous newspapers and other websites have published recipes with reference to this factoid, likely referenced without attribution to this WP article. None of these should be used as a reference unless they pre-date this article's first mention, or have unambiguous supporting citations. Mindmatrix 22:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Biscotto" is the italian word for "cookie" - as in, any type of cookie. Why this specific cookie is named after the generic word for it? 82.111.146.18 (talk) 09:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows? But the reason isn't essential to the article. --Thnidu (talk) 06:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pepperbeast has reverted an edit of mine in § Name as "unnecessary". Rather than edit warring I am raising the subject for discussion here, where Pepperbeast can respond and others can comment.

Here is the paragraph as it was before my edit and as it is now, after the reversion; the sentences on a grey background are not involved in the reversion and do not affect its meaning:

The word biscotti, in this sense, shares its origin with the British English word "biscuit", which describes what American English-speakers refer to as a "cookie". In modern Italian, the word biscotti refers to any cookie or cracker, just as does the British use of the word "biscuit". The number of bakings or hardness is not relevant to the term. In America, the term "biscotti" refers only to the specific Italian cookie.

Here is my version, which I summarized as Balance descriptions of the British and American senses of the word "biscuit":

The word biscotti, in this sense, shares its origin with the English word "biscuit", which in British English refers to what American English-speakers call a "cookie", and in American English typically refers to a soft, leavened quick bread (see Biscuit (bread)). In modern Italian, the word biscotti refers to any cookie or cracker, just as does the British use of the word "biscuit". The number of bakings or hardness is not relevant to the term. In America, the term "biscotti" refers only to the specific Italian cookie.

If the British sense of the word "biscuit" is worth mentioning, the American one is also. My edit covers both dialects in a balanced manner.

Further down, and not involved in the reversion, the one-sentence subsection History: North America defines the "North American" use of "biscotti" differently, and wrongly:

In North America, where "biscuit" has taken on other meanings, any twice-baked cookies are likely to be known as biscotti.

In my almost seventy years I have lived in New York, Massachusetts, Berkeley, and Philadelphia, and I have never heard "biscotti" used for anything but "twice-baked, oblong-shaped, dry, crunchy" baked goods. (I can't speak for any part of Canada.) Merriam-Webster defines thus:

Definition of biscotto

plural biscotti

a crisp cookie or biscuit of Italian origin that is flavored usually with anise and filberts or almonds —usually used in plural

I'm editing that subsection to match.

--Thnidu (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What I think is unnecessary is the comment " and in American English typically refers to a soft, leavened quick bread (see Biscuit (bread))". It's irrelevant. PepperBeast (talk) 18:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, pepperbeast, on rereading & reconsideration I guess I have to agree with you there. It's too many steps away from the topic. --Thnidu (talk) 03:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]