Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 20

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malta Music Awards 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Watermarks suggest non-free image. Eeekster (talk) 00:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freeman Field Mutiny.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Library of Congress shows that this photo comes from the NAACP, not the US Air Force. Kelly ^hi! 02:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • LOC description page at [1] states: "No known restrictions on publication." -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only surviving pictures of the arrest were taken surreptitiously by Sgt. Harold Beaulieu who was in charge of the USAAF photo lab at Freeman. His images eventually became part of the NAACP collection donated to the LOC. The problem is: 1) The picture wasn't exactly taken as "part of his official duties;" and 2) The NAACP collection (unlike the Bain Collection) probably includes some images not owned by the NAACP. Does anyone think that a "fair use" tag would be more appropriate? -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • EUREKA! I found the same image at Encyclopedia of Alabama, with the credit "Courtesy of the U.S. Air Force." -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Looks like good sourcing - I copied the image over to Commons. Thanks! Kelly ^hi! 00:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Given source doesn't match photo. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Given source doesn't match photo. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Huac.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Library of Congress states this is an AP photo. No evidence that it was published without a copyright notice as claimed. Kelly ^hi! 04:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • But there are links to copyright renewal records without hits, so it might be fine. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmm, perhaps, but the AP is generally pretty conscientious about its copyrights, and we usually avoid using any of their stuff per WP:NFCC#2. Kelly ^hi! 22:08, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • See also the similar request Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png (about a different AP image). --Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raifordredcross.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of ever being released out of copyright Secret ^account 05:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BlufordBust.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of copyrightable modern statue, no "freedom of panorama" (US). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

learn something new every day! (no "freedom of panorama"). I'll see about a pic with a person viewing the display, or something. For now, the photo is not publicly displayed, and since it is not a panoramic shot per se, possibly arguable that it should be speedily deleted. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 13:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, maybe you misunderstood the term "freedom of panorama" a bit (I should have given a link right away; it's explained here). It has nothing to do with being a "panoramic shot", and having a picture with people standing around the artwork wouldn't help much either, I'm afraid. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Missori newmadridsign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a sign by State Historical Society of Missouri which is not a federal organisation, so this would appear to be unfree per Commons:COM:FOP#United States. Stefan2 (talk) 10:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RSMedia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be some kind of doll or robot or something. See Commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:27 Jenniffer Gonzalez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:27 Jenniffer Gonzalez.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edison Misla.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a work of Cámera de representantes in Puerto Rico: [2] As this is not part of the federal government, it is not covered by {{PD-USGov}}. Stefan2 (talk) 12:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:19 Angel Viera.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:19 Angel Viera.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos Vizcarrondo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carlos Vizcarrondo.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:20 Luis Ramos Yordan.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:20 Luis Ramos Yordan.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maldives2-756161.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Nice photo. But it has no source and meta data. There is a few hits on tineye but they could perhaps be copied from here. MGA73 (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 11:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sokil white.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I think that this logo is copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would it not qualify under non-free logo? here is the logo. --Львівське (говорити) 19:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep with the addition of a valid fair use rational. -DJSasso (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Felix Soto Toro.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• site is dead, IA copy is without this image - http://web.archive.org/web/20060929002325/http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/people/bios/space/soto_toro.html Bulwersator (talk) 19:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, As uploader, I agree the website is now dead. Replaced. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yale-library-stained-glass2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of copyrighted art (see more pictures on G. Owen Bonawit) - maybe may pass as fair use Bulwersator (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spirit of France Maiden Arrival in Dover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo comes from a clearly copyrighted website and even has a copyright notice in the top right corner. I might be missing something, but I think this is a copyvio. Andrew (User:90) (talk) 21:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: For what it's worth, a brief discussion regarding this photo took place on the uploader's talk page. --Andrew (User:90) (talk) 21:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some user uploaded a few pictures of that boat from the same web site a few weeks ago. They were all deleted, so I requested F9 deletion. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 11:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fox terrier snowy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:KENTA wrestler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:KENTA puro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user has uploaded many copyrighted images according to his talk page. These images are the only ones left and I'm quite suspicious. Only one of them has any EXIF data at all and two of them are in a web resolution. Image quality seems to differ quite a bit. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PNervi2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This might be unfree in both the United States and Italy. There are two copyrights involved: the photo task and the derivative work (freedom of panorama). The picture was taken in 1960, and if English Wikipedia's interpretation of the Italian photo law is correct, it would mean that the copyright expired in 1980. However, there is still the derivative work part: as the building remains copyrighted until 2050, I assume that the architect would still be able to claim copyright to the parts of the photo displaying the building. And since those parts presumably were copyrighted in Italy on the URAA date, I would guess that copyright might have been restored. But I'm not really sure. Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• File:Pirelli T0.png, File:Gio Genova.jpg and File:Pirelli T1.png have the same problem, by the way. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.