Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 July 6

< July 5	July 7 >

July 6

File:Donald Trump twitter dp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image being used as an image in {{tweet}} for Donald Trump. It's usage is decorative and is not needed to understand any tweet. The tweet is attributed so there is no need to use an image as an identifier Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 01:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:As for NFCC#8 you can argue that its omission would impede the understanding of users because not using an image may lead users to believe it came from a non-official or parody account. Now I am not saying there aren't parody accounts on twitter with same picture as the official account, but an image and the template should give an impression of an attributable tweet, visually close to the appearance of official tweet. For NFCC#1, I'd argue that we don't have any free alternative to replace. - Harsh 01:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the image from Donald Trump because of the dispute. I want to add that, since wikipedia has a much stricter and restrictive standard in comparison to Fair Use under U.S. copyright law, the interpretation of whether the use of display pictures in {{tweet}} is merely for decorative purpose or a useful purpose is open to interpretation for editors. - Harsh 02:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#8. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lista za Rijeku - Lista per Fiume logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused, superior version available: File:Lista za Rijeku.png FASTILY 04:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, I think it's fine to have the same file in multiple formats so long as we don't go crazy with it. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - pointless to keep this around given it is not in use. -- Whpq (talk) 21:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taylor Swift - Gorgeous.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appear to be screenshots from a video Swift uploaded on Instagram, is this appropriate? The image was never used as artwork for the song's release, so it fails the WP:NFCC in my opinion because what is it helping readers identify?-- N Ø 11:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, The original post was the file's template. And while the image isn't the single artwork, it was used to advertise the song, much like File:Meghan Trainor - Evil Twin.png. Which has been discussed and accepted. --Calhounmuse (talk) 02:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The "file's template"? This isn't a post, it's a link to Swift's Instagram timeline. Calhounmuse, WP:BURDEN is on you to verify Swift uploaded the image. Note: The uploader of this file has a long history of faking file origins, and Instagram wasn't even the source used during the original upload, it was the YouTube thumbnail website.--N Ø 03:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I implore you since you care so much, go through her Instagram. It's there. I don't appreciate being called a liar, and you would do well not to pass judgement when I'm sure you've made edits or decisions on here that were argued against. For as many mistakes that I've made when uploading images, I've uploaded images that are still being used. I'm here to talk about File:Taylor Swift - Gorgeous.jpg's standing on this site, not my credibility. Please stay on topic. --Calhounmuse (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file is not on any of Swift's social media, no. There is no reason for me to go hunting where you got this file from, considering my claim is that she didn't upload it. As was told earlier, WP:BURDEN is on the uploader to prove where the file came from. If you are caught lying about a file's origin, I assure you admins will not be kind about it.--N Ø 04:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, yes it is Here. Took me 30 seconds to "hunt down".

So you did screenshot this video as I originally claimed, thanks for admitting it.--N Ø 04:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's an image on Taylor Swift's main page. --Calhounmuse (talk) 04:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As nominator. Since the uploader has admitted it was randomly screenshotted from a 30 second video Swift uploaded. It's not artwork.--N Ø 04:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that. I said it took me 30 seconds to find the post! The post you refused to look for. It's maybe a 5 second video and on the main page of Taylor Swift's Instagram it's a static image. The one I originally uploaded. --Calhounmuse (talk) 04:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I've said before on uploader's talk page, screenshots aren't the same thing as official cover art for a song. We'd probably be better off using remix artwork if anything for this track. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a screenshot. --Calhounmuse (talk) 04:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is; the link it was clearly taken from has already been presented, and the only way someone could get a still image from that was by taking a screenshot. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rgletourneau-statue-eliotlandrum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This statue is from 1989, and the US doesn't have freedom of panorama for artwork and sculptures (unless they're PD due to their age). Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 16:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.