Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shy Love
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:00, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Shy Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There is no evidence that the subject satisfies WP:PORNBIO criteria Tatarian (talk) 14:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. she appears to fail WP:PORNBIO. Dzhugashvili (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per above, fails WP:PORNBIO. HollyHuntaway (talk) 14:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. David in DC (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]
- Keep - Added some AVN Awards nominations which should satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Satisfies WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- not only satisfies additional criteria under WP:PORNBIO, but also passes general standard of WP:N.Horrorshowj (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - passes WP:PORNBIO with the AVN nominations. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.