Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pia Bauer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pia Bauer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this nurse satisfies WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Having a prize named after her is a good indication of notability; also received the highest international nursing award; scope for further expansion from the German article. PamD 17:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, can be expanded using sources in German article, clearly notable in the field of nursing. —Kusma (t·c) 08:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, taking a good look on the German article , notability found Yarozika utti (talk) 15:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I disagree with the nom, this does meet the guidelines. Dysklyver 22:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - WP:BEFORE is important and this clearly passes WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 00:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.