Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDE Frameworks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 23:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KDE Frameworks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources in this article are KDE-related or primary, violating WP:N and WP: NSOFT Biel ^talk 23:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:58, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep: It is seems it is WP:BEFORE that has been violated, the tone being vexacious. Per WP:NEXIST the state of sourcing within the article is in itself not relevant, and that is what is in the nomination on my visitation. It is lamentable the state of the sourcing in the article but I see no evidence of a WP:BEFORE here in the nomination. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Articles at 9to5 Linux, OMG Ubuntu!, and FOSS Linux establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 18:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment @NemesisAT: These references are not in the article, it would be great if someone would add them there. Biel ^talk 23:26, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per above good sources founded by @NemesisAT:. Jaysonsands (talk) 11:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.