User talk:Soda drinker

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on the edit summary for this revision. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alex2564 (talk) 00:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dude wat r u doin wiv sandbax stahp ett :( Helicopter Llama 20:14, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

srsly stahp D:

Helicopter Llama 20:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For helping me cause hilarious nonsense in the sandbox. Alex2564 (talk) 20:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:98.204.128.49. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 22:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Usage of level 4 was a typo, level 3 was intended. Soda Drinker (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Carl Andrew Spaatz. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Unsourced nicknames nuked Soda Drinker (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Soda drinker. You have new messages at GSK's talk page.
Message added 23:14, 1 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

GSK ● ✉ ✓ 23:14, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your triggering the spam bots in the sand box if you don't want to do so than don't save without changes. Pug6666 01:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pug6666 (talk • contribs)

• Thank you for your warning Soda Drinker (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that I have declined your request for speedy deletion of this page. The template you used only applies to articles that are within the article space. This page is within the userspace and most users use it to develop articles before they move it to the article space. Let me know if you have any questions. Mike V • Talk 01:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Okay. Thank you for considering my request - I should have realized that. Soda Drinker (talk) 01:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:127.0.0.1, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social network. Don't go around adding random jokes to pages. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 01:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Understood - it is specifically stated that that page is a joke, however. Soda Drinker (talk) 01:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --GSK ● ✉ ✓ 01:57, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created, Talk:ECW Records, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it serves only to attack some entity. Please do not continue to create attack pages, as you will be blocked from editing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Seaphoto^Talk 04:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding that page, it was created in order to delete the main article, which has now been deleted. Soda Drinker (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please make your reply quite distinct from the original message. See the other changes I am making with this edit. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's a separate sandbox where warning messages can be tested at User talk:Sandbox for user warnings. Personal attacks, warnings and block notices[1] should not be used in the main sandbox, as they could mislead or offend new users. Peter James (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, just a quick friendly note to draw your attention to Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. You might want to give some thought to changing it. Cheers, Stalwart111 07:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soda drinker, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GSK ● ✉ ✓ 00:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]