Semi-variable cost

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Semi-variable cost" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article may contain excessive or irrelevant examples. Please help improve the article by adding descriptive text and removing less pertinent examples. (June 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In accounting and economics, a semi-variable cost (also referred to as semi-fixed cost) is an expense which contains both a fixed-cost component and a variable-cost component.^[1] It is often used to project financial performance at different scales of production. It is related to the scale of production within the business where there is a fixed cost which remains constant^[2] across all scales of production while the variable cost increases proportionally to production levels.^[3]

Using a factory as an example, fixed costs can include the leasing of the factory building and insurance, while the variable costs include overtime pay and the purchase price of the raw materials.^[4][5]

In the simplest case, where cost is linear in output, the equation for the total semi-variable cost is as follows:^[6]

${\displaystyle Y=a+bX}$

where ${\displaystyle Y}$ is the total cost, ${\displaystyle a}$ is the fixed cost, ${\displaystyle b}$ is the variable cost per unit, and ${\displaystyle X}$ is the number of units (i.e. the output produced).

A factory costs £5000 per week to produce goods at a minimum level and due to high demand it has to produce for an extra 20 hours in the week. Including the wages, utility bills, raw materials etc. the extra cost per hour (the variable cost) is £300. In this example, the weekly fixed cost (${\displaystyle a}$) is £5000, the variable cost (${\displaystyle b}$) is £300 per hour, and the output (${\displaystyle X}$) is 20 hours. To find the total cost ${\displaystyle Y}$, we calculate:

${\displaystyle Y=a+bX=5,000+300*20=11,000}$

The total cost would be £11,000 to run the factory for this particular week.

If the variable part of the cost is not linear, calculating an estimate can be more difficult. The high-low method is a relatively common method used by managers and accountants alike to estimate the variable costs as if they were linear. By identifying the time period where production is at its highest and its lowest, and inputting the figures into the high–low equation, we can separate out the variable and fixed costs. To find the variable cost ${\displaystyle b}$ per unit:^[7][8]

${\displaystyle b=(Y_{1}-Y_{2})/(X_{1}-X_{2})}$

where ${\displaystyle Y_{1}}$ is the total variable cost at the high end of activity, ${\displaystyle Y_{2}}$ is the cost at the low end of activity, ${\displaystyle X_{1}}$ is the number of units at the high end, and ${\displaystyle X_{2}}$ is the number of units at the low end.

A factory's costs are £10,600 during the busiest week, and £8,500 during the quietest week. The fixed cost is known to be £5,000, so the variable cost during the busy week (${\displaystyle Y_{1}}$) is £5,600, and during the quiet week (${\displaystyle Y_{2}}$) is £3,500. The factory was running for 70 hours during the busy week (${\displaystyle X_{1}}$) and 40 hours during the quiet week (${\displaystyle X_{2}}$). To estimate the variable cost per hour, we calculate:

${\displaystyle b=(5,600-3,500)/(70-40)=2,100/30=70}$

So the estimated variable cost is £70 per hour. This estimate can now be used with the linear formula from before; if the factory is going to run for 60 hours in the coming week, the total cost ${\displaystyle Y}$ can be calculated:$${\displaystyle Y=a+bX=5,000+70*60=9,200}$$So the predicted total cost for the week would be £9,200.

A major advantage of the high-low method is that it is relatively simple to calculate. This enables an estimate for the fixed costs and variable costs can be found in a short time, with only basic mathematics^[3] and no expensive programs to run the calculations, allowing for the firm to invest their finite resources elsewhere. This is particularly useful for smaller firms which do not that the budget to afford external, more qualified accountants.^[9]

As this particular method only uses the highest and lowest figures it means individuals in companies can simply research the data in the company database (as the total costs and scale of production would be widely available to employees or easily attainable). This would allow all employees in the business to calculate the semi-variable costs and its components easily resulting in them having a better understanding of how the company performs and its expenses.^[10]

However, the high-low method can only produce an estimate.^[11] As it only uses two sets of data, the highest and lowest, it can be largely unreliable as often firms can have high variances in production levels and this method would not be able to capture the average activity levels.^[12] There are more accurate methods such as the least-squares regression, although this is much more complex to use.^[5]

Another major drawback of the high-low method is that only one variable is taken into account. For example, if the variable cost is measured by time (e.g. per hour), but the firm wants to produce at a higher level than it ever has before, expansions costs (such are buying more equipment, hiring more people, etc.) will not be taken into account. The disadvantage of calculating semi-variable costs through this particular method is that it would underestimate the cost as it does not separate the fixed and variable costs, leading to the increase in expenditure being neglected and resulting in incorrect forecasts. This could lead to the firm's bottom line eroding as the individual would estimate lower costs than what it would occur and profits would be lower than expected.