Intentional community

Part of a series on
Living spaces
Main House: detached semi-detached terraced Apartment Bungalow Cottage Ecohouse Green home Housing project Human outpost I-house Ranch Tenement Condominium Mixed-use development Hotel Hostel Castle Public housing Squat Flophouse Shack Slum Shanty town Villa
Issues Affordability Affordability in the United States Executive housing Environmental: design planning racism Environmental security Eviction Fair housing Healthiness Homelessness Housing crisis Housing discrimination Housing stress Overpopulation Housing inequality Home ownership Luxury apartments Ownership equity Permit Rent Subprime lending Subsidized housing Sustainable: architecture development living Sustainable city Toxic hotspot Vagrancy
Society and politics Housing First Housing subsidy NIMBY Rapid Re-Housing Real estate appraisal Real estate bubble Real estate economics Real estate investing Redlining Rent regulation Right to housing Rent control Rent strike Tenants union YIMBY
Other Alternative lifestyle Assisted living Boomtown Cottage homes Eco-cities Ecovillage Foster care Green building Group home Halfway house Healthy community design Homeless shelter Hospital Local community Log house Natural building Nursing home Orphanage Prison Psychiatric hospital Residential care Residential treatment center Retirement community Retirement home Supportive housing Supported living Housing portal
v t e

Part of a series on
Utopias
Mythical and religious
Arcadia City of the Caesars Cloud cuckoo land Cockaigne Eden Elysium Fortunate Isles Garden of the gods Shangri-La Golden Age Satya Yuga Great Unity Ketumati Kingdom of God Opona Libertatia Mag Mell Mahoroba Merry England Mezzoramia Mount Penglai Most Great Peace New Jerusalem Zion
Literature
Ideology and Utopia List The Republic Utopia Gulliver's Travels Dystopian literature
Theory
Communitas perfecta Communist society Heterotopia Ideal city Sforzinda Pantisocracy Real utopian sociology Third International Theory Utopia for Realists Utopian studies
Concepts
Arcology Agriculturalism Escapism Millenarianism New Man Social harmony Technological Cyber-utopianism Post-scarcity economy Transhumanism Utopian socialism
Practice
Architecture HosPex Open borders Pirate utopia UBI Intentional community Atarashiki-mura Egalitarian Huaxi Village Nanjie Sustainable Communities by country America Finland Germany Organizations Associationists Anthroposophs Lindisfarne Millennium WSF Zeitgeist
v t e

An intentional community is a voluntary residential community designed to foster a high degree of social cohesion and teamwork.^[1][2][3] Members typically unite around shared values, beliefs, or a common vision, which may be political, religious, spiritual, or simply focused on the practical benefits of cooperation and mutual support. While some groups emphasise shared ideologies, others are centred on enhancing social connections, sharing resources, and creating meaningful relationships.

Although intentional communities are sometimes described as alternative lifestyles^[4] or social experiments,^[1][5] some see them as a natural response to the isolation and fragmentation of modern housing, offering a return to the social bonds and collaborative spirit found in traditional village life.^[6]

The multitude of intentional communities includes collective households, cohousing communities, coliving, ecovillages, monasteries, survivalist retreats, kibbutzim, Hutterites, ashrams, and housing cooperatives.

Ashrams are likely the earliest intentional communities, founded around 1500 BCE. Buddhist monasteries appeared around 500 BCE.^[7] Pythagoras founded an intellectual vegetarian commune in about 525 BCE in southern Italy.^[8] Hundreds of modern intentional communities were formed across Europe, North and South America, Australia, and New Zealand out of the intellectual foment of utopianism.^[8] Intentional communities exhibit the utopian ambition to create a better, more sustainable world for living.^[8] Nevertheless, the term utopian community as a synonym for an intentional community might be considered to be of pejorative nature and many intentional communities do not consider themselves to be utopian.^[1] Also the alternative term commune^[a] is considered to be non-neutral or even linked to leftist politics or hippies.^[10][11][12]

Additional terms referring to an intentional community can be alternative lifestyle, intentional society, cooperative community, withdrawn community, enacted community, socialist colony, communistic society, collective settlement, communal society, commune, mutualistic community, communitarian experiment, experimental community, utopian experiment, practical utopia, and utopian society.^[13]

Authorship	Year	Definition
B. Shenker	1986	"An intentional community is a relatively small group of people who have created a whole way of life for the attainment of a certain set of goals."[1]
D. E. Pitzer	1989	Intentional communities are "small, voluntary social units partly isolated from the general society in which members share an economic union and lifestyle in an attempt to implement, at least in part, their ideal ideological, religious, political, social, economic, and educational systems".[2]
G. Kozeny	1996	"An 'intentional community' is a group of people who have chosen to live together with a common purpose, working cooperatively to create a lifestyle that reflects their shared core values. The people may live together on a piece of rural land, in a suburban home, or in an urban neighborhood, and they may share a single residence or live in a cluster of dwellings."[14]
W. J. Metcalf	2004	An intentional community is "[f]ive or more people, drawn from more than one family or kinship group, who have voluntarily come together for the purpose of ameliorating perceived social problems and inadequacies. They seek to live beyond the bounds of mainstream society by adopting a consciously devised and usually well thought-out social and cultural alternative. In the pursuit of their goals, they share significant aspects of their lives together. Participants are characterized by a "we-consciousness," seeing themselves as a continuing group, separate from and in many ways better than the society from which they emerged."[3]

The purposes of intentional communities vary and may be political, spiritual, economic, or environmental.^[15] In addition to spiritual communities, secular communities also exist.^[16] One common practice, particularly in spiritual communities, is communal meals.^[17] Egalitarian values can be combined with other values.^[18] Benjamin Zablocki categorized communities this way:^[19]

• Academic communities (see Living-Learning Communities)
• Alternative-family communities (see Tenacious Unicorn Ranch)
• Coliving communities
• Cooperative communities
• Countercultural communities
• Egalitarian communities
• Experimental communities
• Political communities
• Psychological communities (based on mystical or gestalt principles)
• Rehabilitational communities (see Synanon)
• Religious communities
• Spiritual communities

Members of Christian intentional communities want to emulate the practices of the earliest believers. Using the biblical book of Acts (and, often, the Sermon on the Mount) as a model, members of these communities strive to demonstrate their faith in a corporate context,^[20] and to live out the teachings of the New Testament, practicing compassion and hospitality.^[21] Communities such as the Simple Way, the Bruderhof and Rutba House would fall into this category. Despite strict membership criteria, these communities are open to visitors and not reclusive to the extent of some other intentional communities.^[22]

A survey in the 1995 edition of the "Communities Directory", published by the Fellowship for Intentional Community (FIC), reported that 54 percent of the communities choosing to list themselves were rural, 28 percent were urban, 10 percent had both rural and urban sites, and 8 percent did not specify.^[23]

The most common form of governance in intentional communities is democratic (64 percent), with decisions made by some form of consensus decision-making or voting. A hierarchical or authoritarian structure governs 9 percent of communities, 11 percent are a combination of democratic and hierarchical structure, and 16 percent do not specify.^[23]

The central characteristics of communes, or core principles that define communes, have been expressed in various forms over the years. The Suffolk-born radical John Goodwyn Barmby (1820-1881), subsequently a Unitarian minister, invented the term "communitarian"^{[24][failed verification]} in 1840.^[25]

At the start of the 1970s, The New Communes author Ron E. Roberts classified communes as a subclass of a larger category of utopias.^[26] He listed three main characteristics:^[27]

• First, egalitarianism – communes specifically rejected hierarchy or graduations of social status as being necessary to social order.
• Second, human scale – members of some communes saw the scale of society as it was then organized as being too industrialized (or factory sized) and therefore unsympathetic to human dimensions.
• Third, communes were consciously anti-bureaucratic.

Twenty-five years later, Dr. Bill Metcalf, in his edited book Shared Visions, Shared Lives, defined communes as having the following core principles:^{[28][page needed]}

• the importance of the group as opposed to the nuclear family unit
• a "common purse"
• a collective household
• group decision-making in general and intimate affairs

Sharing everyday life and facilities, a commune is an idealized form of family, being a new sort of "primary group" (generally with fewer than 20 people, although there are examples of much larger communes). Commune members have emotional bonds to the whole group rather than to any sub-group,^{[citation needed]} and the commune is experienced with emotions that go beyond just social collectivity.^[29]

With the simple definition of a commune as an intentional community with 100% income sharing, the online directory of the Fellowship for Intentional Community (FIC)^[30] lists 222 communes worldwide (28 January 2019).^[31] Some of these are religious institutions such as abbeys and monasteries. Others are based in anthroposophic philosophy, including Camphill villages that provide support for the education, employment, and daily lives of adults and children with developmental disabilities, mental health problems or other special needs.^[32]

Many cultures naturally practice communal or tribal living, and would not designate their way of life as a planned "commune" per se, though their living situation may have many characteristics of a commune.

In Australia, many intentional communities started with the hippie movement and those searching for social alternatives to the nuclear family. One of the oldest continuously running communities is called "Moora Moora Co-operative Community"^[33] with about 47 members (Oct 2021). Located at the top of Mount Toolebewong, 65 km east of Melbourne, Victoria at an altitude of 600–800 m, this community has been entirely off the electricity grid since its inception in 1974. Founding members still resident include Peter and Sandra Cock.

The first wave of utopian communities in Germany began during a period of rapid urbanization between 1890 and 1930. About 100 intentional communities were started^[34] but data is unreliable.^[35] They often pursued nudism, vegetarian and organic agriculture, as well as various religious and political ideologies like anabaptism, theosophy, anarchism, socialism and eugenics. Historically, German emigrants were also influential in the creation of intentional communities in other countries, like the Bruderhof in the United States of America and Kibbutzim in Israel. In the 1960s, there was a resurgence of communities calling themselves communes, starting with the Kommune 1 in Berlin, without knowledge of or influence by previous movements.^[36] A large number of contemporary intentional communities define themselves as communes, and there is a network of political communes called "Kommuja"^[37] with about 40 member groups (May 2023).

In the German commune book, Das KommuneBuch, communes are defined by Elisabeth Voß as communities which:^[38]

• Live and work together
• Have a communal economy, i.e., common finances and common property (land, buildings, means of production)
• Have communal decision making – usually consensus decision making
• Try to reduce hierarchy and hierarchical structures
• Have communalization of housework, childcare and other communal tasks
• Have equality between women and men
• Have low ecological footprints through sharing and saving resources

Kibbutzim in Israel, (sing., kibbutz) are examples of officially organized communes, the first of which were based on agriculture. Other Israeli communities are Kvutza, Yishuv Kehilati, Moshavim and Kfar No'ar. Today, there are dozens of urban communes growing in the cities of Israel, often called urban kibbutzim. The urban kibbutzim are smaller and more anarchist.^[39] Most of the urban communes in Israel emphasize social change, education, and local involvement in the cities where they live. Some of the urban communes have members who are graduates of zionist-socialist youth movements, like HaNoar HaOved VeHaLomed, HaMahanot HaOlim and Hashomer Hatsair.^[40]

In 1831 John Vandeleur (a landlord) established a commune on his Ralahine Estate at Newmarket-on-Fergus, County Clare. Vandeleur asked Edward Thomas Craig, an English socialist, to formulate rules and regulations for the commune. It was set up with a population of 22 adult single men, 7 married women and their 7 husbands, 5 single women, 4 orphan boys and 5 children under the age of 9 years. No money was employed, only credit notes which could be used in the commune shop. All occupants were committed to a life with no alcohol, tobacco, snuff or gambling. All were required to work for 12 hours a day during the summer and from dawn to dusk in winter. The social experiment prospered for a time and 29 new members joined. However, in 1833 the experiment collapsed due to the gambling debts of John Vandeleur. The members of the commune met for the last time on 23 November 1833 and placed on record a declaration of "the contentment, peace and happiness they had experienced for two years under the arrangements introduced by Mr. Vandeleur and Mr. Craig and which through no fault of the Association was now at an end".^[41]

In imperial Russia, the vast majority of Russian peasants held their land in communal ownership within a mir community, which acted as a village government and a cooperative.^[42][43] The very widespread and influential pre-Soviet Russian tradition of monastic communities of both sexes could also be considered a form of communal living. After the end of communism in Russia, monastic communities have again become more common, populous and, to a lesser degree, more influential in Russian society. Various patterns of Russian behavior — toloka (толока), pomochi (помочи), artel (артель) — are also based on communal ("мирские") traditions.

In the years immediately following the revolutions of 1917 Tolstoyan communities proliferated in Russia, but later they were eventually wiped out or stripped of their independence as collectivisation and ideological purges got under way in the late 1920s.^[44] Colonies, such as the Life and Labor Commune, relocated to Siberia to avoid being liquidated. Several Tolstoyan leaders, including Yakov Dragunovsky (1886-1937), were put on trial and then sent to the Gulag prison camps.^[45]

In 1991, Afrikaners in South Africa founded the controversial Afrikaner-only town of Orania, with the goal of creating a stronghold for the Afrikaner minority group, the Afrikaans language and the Afrikaner culture.^[46] By 2022, the population was 2,500. The town was experiencing rapid growth and the population had climbed by 55% from 2018.^[47] They favour a model of strict Afrikaner self-sufficiency and have their own currency, bank, local government and only employ Afrikaners.^[48]

A 19th century advocate and practitioner of communal living was the utopian socialist John Goodwyn Barmby, who founded a Communist Church before becoming a Unitarian minister.^[49]

The Simon Community in London is an example of social cooperation, made to ease homelessness within London. It provides food and religion and is staffed by homeless people and volunteers.^[50] Mildly nomadic, they run street "cafés" which distribute food to their known members and to the general public.

The Bruderhof^[51] has three locations in the UK.^[52] In Glandwr, near Crymych, Pembrokeshire, a co-op called Lammas Ecovillage focuses on planning and sustainable development. Granted planning permission by the Welsh Government in 2009, it has since created 9 holdings and is a central communal hub for its community.^[53] In Scotland, the Findhorn Foundation founded by Peter and Eileen Caddy and Dorothy Maclean in 1962^[54] is prominent for its educational centre and experimental architectural community project based at The Park, in Moray, Scotland, near the village of Findhorn.^[55]

The Findhorn Ecovillage community at The Park, Findhorn, a village in Moray, Scotland, and at Cluny Hill in Forres, now houses more than 400 people.^[56]

Historic agricultural examples include the Diggers settlement on St George's Hill, Surrey during the English Civil War and the Clousden Hill Free Communist and Co-operative Colony near Newcastle upon Tyne during the 1890s.^[57][58]

There is a long history of utopian communities in America that led to the rise in the communes of the hippie movement—the "back-to-the-land" ventures of the 1960s and 1970s.^[59] One commune that played a large role in the hippie movement was Kaliflower, a utopian living cooperative that existed in San Francisco between 1967 and 1973 built on values of free love and anti-capitalism.

Andrew Jacobs of The New York Times wrote that "after decades of contraction, the American commune movement has been expanding since the mid-1990s, spurred by the growth of settlements that seek to marry the utopian-minded commune of the 1960s with the American predilection for privacy and capital appreciation".^[60] The Fellowship for Intentional Community (FIC) is one of the main sources for listings of and more information about communes in the United States.

Although many American communes are short-lived, some have been in operation for over 50 years. The Bruderhof was established in the US in 1954,^[20] Twin Oaks in 1967^[61] and Koinonia Farm in 1942.^[62] Twin Oaks is a rare example of a non-religious commune surviving for longer than 30 years.

• Christian, Diana Leafe (2003). Creating a life together: practical tools to grow ecovillages and intentional communities. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers. ISBN 9781550923162. OCLC 232159819.
• Curl, John (2007) Memories of Drop City, the First Hippie Commune of the 1960s and the Summer of Love: a memoir. iUniverse. ISBN 0-595-42343-4.
• Kanter, Rosabeth Moss (1972) Commitment and Community: communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-14575-5
• McLaughlin, C. and Davidson, G. (1990) Builders of the Dawn: community lifestyles in a changing world. Book Publishing Company. ISBN 0-913990-68-X
• Lupton, Robert C. (1997) Return Flight: Community Development Through Reneighboring our Cities, Atlanta, Georgia:FCS Urban Ministries.
• Moore, Charles E. Called to Community: The Life Jesus Wants for His People. Plough Publishing House, 2016.
• "Intentional Community." Plough, Plough Publishing, www.plough.com/en/topics/community/intentional-community.
• Mariani, Mike: The New Generation of Self-Created Utopias, The New York Times, January 16, 2020

• Federation of Egalitarian Communities
• Intentional Communities Website
• eurotopia European Directory of Communities and Ecovillages
• Intentional Communities Wiki
• List of Communes Archived 2011-09-08 at the Wayback Machine in the Communities Directory Archived 2011-09-08 at the Wayback Machine
• Intentional Community For Media and Spirituality Archived 2013-09-18 at archive.today
• Diggers & Dreamers UK directory & Journal
• The Twitter Age Embraces Communal Living – slideshow by The New York Times
• International Communes Desk